A Literature Review Reveals that Trials Evaluating Treatment of Non-Specific Low Back Pain Use Inconsistent Criteria to Identify Serious Pathologies and Nerve Root Involvement

F. Morrison

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350272

physioscience 2013; 9(3): 127
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350272

gelesen und kommentiert

A Literature Review Reveals that Trials Evaluating Treatment of Non-Specific Low Back Pain Use Inconsistent Criteria to Identify Serious Pathologies and Nerve Root Involvement

Eine Literaturübersicht zeigt, dass Studien zur Beurteilung der Behandlung unspezifischer Rückenschmerzen uneinheitliche Kriterien verwenden, um ernsthafte Pathologien und Nervenwurzelbeteiligung zu identifizieren

F. Morrison

Abstract

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23: 2003-2013
2 Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR et al. A consensus approach towards the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine 2008; 33: 95-103
3 Jackson A, Hettinga DM, Mead J et al. Using consensus methods in developing clinical guidelines for exercise in managing persistent low back pain. Physiotherapy 2009; 94: 302-313
4 Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy 2009; 89: 125-135