Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2014; 24(01): 9-13
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357194
Wissenschaft und Forschung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Multizentrische, randomisierte Studie zur Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit der Ganzkörper-Vibration als Add-on zur pharmakologischen Standard-Behandlung von Osteoporose bei Frauen nach der Menopause

Multicentered, Randomized, Cross-Over Study to Investigate Safety and Potency of Whole-Body-Vibrations as Add-on Therapy to Pharmacological Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
E. Seidel
1   SHK Weimar – Zentrum für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin, Weimar
,
M. Rother
2   IMR Partner GmbH – Clinical Operations, Graefelfing
,
A. Fischer
1   SHK Weimar – Zentrum für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin, Weimar
,
K. Regenspurger
1   SHK Weimar – Zentrum für Physikalische und Rehabilitative Medizin, Weimar
,
I. Rother
2   IMR Partner GmbH – Clinical Operations, Graefelfing
,
W. Kneer
3   Praxis für Orthopädie – Facharztpraxis, Stockach
,
G. Baumann
4   Praxis für Orthopädie – Facharztpraxis, Annaberg-Buchholz
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 05 July 2013

angenommen: 20 September 2013

Publication Date:
05 February 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In der vorliegenden, multizentrischen, randomisierten cross-over Studie wurde die Wirkung von Ganzkörpervibration (WBV) auf Biomarker der Knochenresorption, das Sturzrisiko und die Schmerzen im unteren Rücken untersucht. Die Studie erstreckte sich über einen Zeitraum von 12 Wochen. Es wurden 58 Patientinnen mit postmenopausaler Osteoporose eingeschlossen, die mit Alendronat (n=41) oder Raloxifen (n=17) behandelt werden. Die Patientinnen wurden in 2 Gruppen randomisiert. Die erste Gruppe erhielt während des ersten 6-wöchigen Zeitraums der Studie (Periode I) WBV mit 3 Behandlungen pro Woche und mindestens 15 Behandlungen innerhalb von 6 Wochen. In den folgenden 6 Wochen (Periode II) erhielten die Patientinnen, die in Periode I nicht mit WBV behandelt wurden die Therapie und die andere Gruppe nicht mehr. Nach 3, 6, 9 und 12 Wochen wurden die Biomarker Ostase und DXP erfasst, das Sturzrisiko anhand des Tinetti-Tests „Tinetti Mobility Test“ (TMT) beurteilt und die Schmerzstärke im unteren Rückenbereich anhand der numerischen 11-Punkte-Skala ermittelt. Der statistischen Auswertung diente der Wilcoxon-Test (2-Perioden-Crossover-Analyse). Im Ergebnis stellte sich heraus, dass bezüglich der Biomarker des Knochenumbaus keine signifikante Wirkung der Vibrationstherapie (p=0,857 und 0,778) zu verzeichnen war. Im Gegensatz dazu war die Wirkung sowohl auf die Schmerzen im unteren Rücken (p=0,0049) und wie auch auf das Sturzrisiko (p=0,0023) hoch signifikant. WBV scheint eine wertvolle Ergänzung für die symptomatische Behandlung von Schmerzen im unteren Rücken und erhöhtem Sturzrisiko bei postmenopausalen Frauen mit Osteoporose zu sein.

Abstract

This 12 week, multicentered, randomized, cross-over study study investigated the effect of whole body vibration (WBV) on biomarkers of bone remodelling, fall risk and low back pain. Eligi­ble postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis (n=58) were stratified into those on treatment with alendronate (n=41) or raloxifene (n=17) and subsequently randomized to receive either WBV or no WBV during the first 6-week period of the study (period I). WBV was performed at three sessions per week with a minimum of 15 sessions within a period of 6 weeks. At 6 weeks after baseline, patients who were initially randomized to the WBV group were observed for another 6 weeks without receiving WBV in the second period (period II) of the study, whereas those who did not receive WBV in period I were now treated with WBV for the remaining 6 weeks. Treatment effects were evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks using the biomarkers for bone remodeling Ostase and DXP. Fall risk was evaluated by the “Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment”, also called the “Tinetti Mobility Test” (TMT) and low back pain was evaluated by an 11 point numerical scale. For the statistical evaluation, a 2-period crossover-analysis Wilcoxon test (2-sided test for difference) for sums, differences and crossover differences was performed. No significant treatment effects were seen for the biomarkers of bone remodelling (p=0.857 and 0.778). In contrast to this, effects on both low back pain (p=0.0049) and fall risk (p=0.0023) were highly significant. WBV appears to be a valuable addition for the symptomatic treatment of low back pain and fall risk in postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of ostoeporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 399-428
  • 2 Kanis JA, Melton III LJ, Christiansen C et al. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1137-1141
  • 3 Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 385-397
  • 4 Garnero P. Advances is bone turnover assessment with biochemical markers. Medicographia 2008; 30: 339-349
  • 5 McCormick RK. Osteoporosis: Integrating biomarkers and other diagnostic correlates into the management of bone fragility. Altern Med Rev 2007; 12: 113-145
  • 6 Rubin C, Xu G, Judex S. The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to exteremely low-magnitude mechanical stimuli. FASB J 2001; 15: 2225-2229
  • 7 Rubin C, Recker R, Cullan D. Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss by a low magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli: A clinical trial assessing compliance, efficacy and safety. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 343-351
  • 8 Ruan X-Y, Jin F-Y, Liu Y-L et al. Effects of vibration therapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Chin Med J 2008; 121: 1155-1158
  • 9 Verschueren SMP, Roelants M, Delecluse C. Effect of 6-month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: A randomised controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 352-359
  • 10 Johnell O, Scheele WH, Reginster J-Y et al. Additive effects of raloxifene and alendronate on bone density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin ­Endocrinol Metab 87 2008; 87: 985-992
  • 11 Lau RW, Liao LR, Yu F et al. The effects of whole body vibration therapy on bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 975-88
  • 12 Slatkovska L, Alibhai SM, Beyene J et al. Effect of whole-body vibration on BMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int Dec 2010; 21: 1969-1980 [Epub 2010 Apr 21]
  • 13 Wysocki A, Butler M, Shamliyan T et al. Whole-body vibration therapy for osteoporosis: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. Nov 15 2011; 155: 680-686, W206-W213, DOI: 10.1059/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00006.
  • 14 Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986; 34: 119-126
  • 15 Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1701-1707
  • 16 Köpke S, Meyer G. The Tinetti test Babylon in geriatric assessment. Z Gerontol Geriat 2006; 39: 288-291
  • 17 Marks D. Assessment Tinetti Test- Sturzrisiko erkennen. Physiopraxis 2006; 2 www.thieme.de/physioonline „physioassessments“ „POMA/Tinetti-Test“
  • 18 Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005; 113: 9-19
  • 19 Iwamoto J, Takeda T, Sato Y et al. Effect of whole-body vibration exercise on lumbar bone mineral density, bone turnover and chronic back pain in postmenopausal osteoporotic woman treated with alendronate. Aging Clin Exp Res 2005; 17: 157-163
  • 20 von Stengel S, Kemmler W, Engelke K et al. Effects of whole body vibration on bone mineral density and falls: results of the randomized controlled ELVIS study with postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int Jan 2011; 22: 317-325 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1215-4.. [Epub 2010 Mar 20]
  • 21 Iwamoto J, Sato Y, Takeda T et al. Whole body vibration exercise improves body balance and walking velocity in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with alendronate: Galileo and Alendronate Intervention Trail (GAIT). J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2012; 12: 136-143
  • 22 Verschueren SM, Bogaerts A, Delecluse C et al. The effects of whole-body vibration training and vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength, muscle mass, and bone density in institutionalized elderly women: a 6-month randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res Jan 2011; 26: 42-49 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.181.
  • 23 Stolzenberg N, Belavý DL, Rawer R et al. Vibration or Balance Training on Neuromuscular Performance in Osteopenic Women. Int J Sports Med Apr 2 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
  • 24 Russo CR, Lauretani F, Bandinelli S et al. High-frequency vibration training increases muscle power in postmenopausal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1854-1857
  • 25 Seidel EJ, Fischer A, Tentscher J et al. New findings about therapeutic effects of Whole-body-vibration. J Rehabil Med Suppl 2008; Nr.47 p 154
  • 26 Seidel EJ, Piehler N, Hartmann J et al. Die Veränderungen der Propriozeption in der unteren Extremität durch koordinativ-gymnastisches Training im Vergleich zu Vibrationstraining. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 2008; 18:. 219
  • 27 Aleyaasin M, Harrigan JJ. Vibration exercise for treatment of osteoporosis: a theoretical model. Proc Inst Mech Eng 2008; 222 7: 1161-1166