 
         
         Abstract
         
         The present study evaluated the physical demands imposed on female elite team handball
            players in relation to playing position. Female elite team handball field players
            were examined during match-play over a 5-year period using video based computerized
            locomotion analysis of tournament matches. In addition, physiological measurements
            during match-play and in separate physical tests were carried out. A total distance
            of 4 002±551 m (group means±SD) was covered per match with a total effective playing
            time of 50:42±5:50 min:s, while full-time players covered 4 693±333 m. On average,
            each player (n=83) performed 663.8±99.7 activity changes per match, and the mean speed
            was 5.31±0.33 km · h−1. High-intensity running constituted 0.8±0.5% of total effective playing time per
            match corresponding to 2.5±1.8% of the total distance covered. The amount of high-intensity
            running was reduced (p<0.05) 21.9% in the second half (44.9±16.8 m) compared to the
            first (57.5±21.3 m). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2-max) was 3.49±0.37 l O2 · min−1 corresponding to 49.6±4.8 ml O2 · min−1 · kg−1. Mean relative workload during match-play was 79.4±6.4% of VO2-max. Mean total running distance in the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (level 1)
            was 1 436±222 m, which was greater in wing players (1 516±172 m, p<0.05) than pivots
            (1 360±118 m) and backcourt players (1 352±148 m). In conclusion, modern female elite
            team handball is a physically demanding intermittent team sport, where players are
            exposed to high relative workloads with substantial estimated aerobic energy expenditure
            interspersed by short periods of dominant anaerobic energy production as reflected
            by the limited amount of high-intensity running. Indications of fatigue and a resulting
            decline in physical performance were identified, since the amount of high-intensity
            running and the relative workload levels decreased in the second half. Positional
            differences were observed, with wing players covering a greater total distance than
            backcourt players, performing more high-intensity running and demonstrating a better
            intermittent recovery capacity (Yo-Yo test outcome) compared to both backcourt players
            and pivots.
         
         Key words
locomotion match analysis - high-intensity running - physiological measurements -
            relative workload - physical testing