Download PDF
Z Orthop Unfall 2014; 152(4): 328-333
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368619
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Niedrigintensiver gepulster Ultraschall zur Behandlung von Frakturen und Pseudarthrosen – Evidenz und Erkenntnisse aus Forschung und Klinik

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound for Treatment of Fractures and Nonunions – Current Evidence and Insights from Basic Research and Clinical Application
T. M. Randau
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
K. Kabir
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
S. Gravius
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
M. D. Wimmer
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
M. J. Friedrich
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
C. Burger
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
,
H. Goost
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
2   Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Krankenhaus Wermelskirchen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 July 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Deutschlandweit werden jährlich 800 000 Frakturen versorgt. In ca. 10 % der Fälle kommt es zur verzögerten Bruchheilung oder Pseudarthrosenbildung. Die operative Behandlung dieser Komplikationen ist aufwendig und mit erheblichen Kosten verbunden, daher kommt der nichtinvasiven Therapie ein zunehmendes Interesse zu. Die adjuvante Behandlung mittels Ultraschall wird bereits seit Jahren zur Verbesserung der Frakturheilung und zur Therapie der verzögerten Knochenheilung propagiert, aber ebenso kontrovers diskutiert. Diese Übersichtsarbeit demonstriert den Stellenwert der niedrigintensiven, gepulsten Ultraschallbehandlung in der Frakturbehandlung anhand von Daten aus der Grundlagenforschung, tierexperimentellen Anwendungen und klinischen Studien.

Abstract

In Germany, 800,000 fractures are treated per year, and up to 10 % of these patients may suffer subsequently from a delayed union or a nonunion at the fracture site. Surgical treatment of these complications is tedious and associated with high costs. Therefore non-operative treatment is recently receiving more scientific and clinical attention. The adjuvant treatment with ultrasound has been propagated for the past years to enhance fracture healing and bony union, and has been discussed controversially. This review article demonstrates the significance of the low intensity pulsed ultrasound application in fracture treatment, on the basis of basic science results, animal experiments and the results of clinical trials.

Schlüsselwörter

Ultraschall - Pseudarthrosen - Knochenbruch - EXOGEN®-Ultraschallsystem - LIPUS

Key words

ultrasound - nonunions - fracture - EXOGEN® Ultrasound System - LIPUS
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Kaminski A, Muhr G. Pseudarthrosen. Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2008; 3: 41-56
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Goost H, Weber O. Knochendefekte und -Rekonstruktion. In: Ruchholz S, Wirtz DC, Hrsg. Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie essentials. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Fehse R. Kostenanalyse bei Frakturheilungsstörungen – Sicht einer Berufsgenossenschaft. Trauma Berufskrankheit 2012; 14: 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Duarte LR. The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983; 101: 153-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Reher P, Elbeshir el NI, Harvey W et al. The stimulation of bone formation in vitro by therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 1251-1258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gortazar AR, Martin-Millan M, Bravo B et al. Crosstalk between caveolin-1/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and beta-catenin survival pathways in osteocyte mechanotransduction. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 8168-8175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pounder NM, Harrison AJ. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for fracture healing: a review of the clinical evidence and the associated biological mechanism of action. Ultrasonics 2008; 48: 330-338
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Naruse K, Miyauchi A, Itoman M et al. Distinct anabolic response of osteoblast to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 360-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Parvizi J, Wu CC, Lewallen DG et al. Low-intensity ultrasound stimulates proteoglycan synthesis in rat chondrocytes by increasing aggrecan gene expression. J Orthop Res 1999; 17: 488-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pilla AA, Mont MA, Nasser PR et al. Non-invasive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone healing in the rabbit. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4: 246-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yang KH, Parvizi J, Wang SJ et al. Exposure to low-intensity ultrasound increases aggrecan gene expression in a rat femur fracture model. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 802-809
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Azuma Y, Ito M, Harada Y et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 671-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Freeman TA, Patel P, Parvizi J et al. Micro-CT analysis with multiple thresholds allows detection of bone formation and resorption during ultrasound-treated fracture healing. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 673-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Naruse K, Sekiya H, Harada Y et al. Prolonged endochondral bone healing in senescence is shortened by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a manner dependent on COX-2. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 1098-1108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gebauer GP, Lin SS, Beam HA et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases the fracture callus strength in diabetic BB Wistar rats but does not affect cellular proliferation. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 587-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Coords M, Breitbart E, Paglia D et al. The effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound upon diabetic fracture healing. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 181-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J et al. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 26-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Coughlin MJ, Smith BW, Traughber P. The evaluation of the healing rate of subtalar arthrodeses, part 2: the effect of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation. Foot Ankle Int 2008; 29: 970-977
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Castillo RC, Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ et al. Impact of smoking on fracture healing and risk of complications in limb-threatening open tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cook SD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J et al. Acceleration of tibia and distal radius fracture healing in patients who smoke. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 337: 198-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Emami A, Petren-Mallmin M, Larsson S. No effect of low-intensity ultrasound on healing time of intramedullary fixed tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1999; 13: 252-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J et al. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 961-973
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Leung KS, Lee WS, Tsui HF et al. Complex tibial fracture outcomes following treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 389-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mayr E, Frankel V, Ruter A. Ultrasound–an alternative healing method for nonunions?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gebauer D, Mayr E, Orthner E et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: effects on nonunions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 1391-1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nolte PA, Klein-Nulend J, Albers GH et al. Low-intensity ultrasound stimulates endochondral ossification in vitro. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 301-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rutten S, Nolte PA, Guit GL et al. Use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for posttraumatic nonunions of the tibia: a review of patients treated in the Netherlands. J Trauma 2007; 62: 902-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schofer MD, Block JE, Aigner J et al. Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jingushi S, Mizuno K, Matsushita T et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for postoperative delayed union or nonunion of long bone fractures. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 35-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mayr E, Mockl C, Lenich A et al. [Is low intensity ultrasound effective in treatment of disorders of fracture healing?]. Unfallchirurg 2002; 105: 108-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lerner A, Stein H, Soudry M. Compound high-energy limb fractures with delayed union: our experience with adjuvant ultrasound stimulation (exogen). Ultrasonics 2004; 42: 915-917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 El-Mowafi H, Mohsen M. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus maturation in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop 2005; 29: 121-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hauser J, Hauser M, Muhr G et al. Ultrasound-induced modifications of cytoskeletal components in osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 286-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mayr E, Rudzki MM, Rudzki M et al. [Does low intensity, pulsed ultrasound speed healing of scaphoid fractures?]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2000; 32: 115-122
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Watanabe Y, Matsushita T, Bhandari M et al. Ultrasound for fracture healing: current evidence. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (Suppl. 01) S56-S61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Griffin XL, Costello I, Costa ML. The role of low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of acute fractures: a systematic review. J Trauma 2008; 65: 1446-1452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Busse JW, Bhandari M, Kulkarni AV et al. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2002; 166: 437-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bashardoust Tajali S, Houghton P, MacDermid JC et al. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91: 349-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Griffin XL, Smith N, Parsons N et al. Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (2) CD008579
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bundesausschuß der Ärzte und Krankenkassen. Bekanntmachung einer Änderung der Richtlinien über die Einführung neuer Untersuchungs- und Behandlungsmethoden und über die Überprüfung erbrachter vertragsärztlicher Leistungen. Bundesanzeiger 1998; 136: 10507
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for the treatment of bone delayed union or nonunion: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35: 529-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar