PDF herunterladen
Open Access
J Neurol Surg Rep 2014; 75(01): e93-e97
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1372474
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Primary Leptomeningeal Melanoma of the Cervical Spine Mimicking a Meningioma—A Case Report

Autoren

  • Sascha Marx

    1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, Greifswald, Germany

  • Steffen K. Fleck

    1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, Greifswald, Germany

  • Jotham Manwaring

    2   Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

  • Silke Vogelgesang

    3   Department of Neuropathology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

  • Soenke Langner

    4   Institut of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, Greifswald, Germany

  • Henry W.S. Schroeder

    1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße, Greifswald, Germany
Weitere Informationen

Address for correspondence

Sascha Marx, MD
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße
17491 Greifswald
Germany   

Publikationsverlauf

19. Dezember 2013

13. Januar 2014

Publikationsdatum:
12. Mai 2014 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
 
 als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background and Importance Primary leptomeningeal melanoma (PLM) is highly malignant and exceedingly rare. Due to its rarity, diagnostic and treatment paradigms have been slow to evolve. We report the first case of a PLM that mimics a cervical spine meningioma and then discuss the current clinical, radiologic, and pathologic diagnostic methodologies as well as expected outcomes related to this disease.

Clinical Presentation A 54-year-old woman presented a dural-based extramedullary solid mass ventral to the C2–C3 spinal cord causing spinal cord compression without cord signal changes, characteristic of meningioma. Intraoperative microscopic inspection revealed numerous black spots littering the surface of the dura; the tumor itself was yellow in appearance and had a soft consistency. Pathologic analysis of the specimen revealed a malignant melanin-containing tumor. No primary site was found, so a diagnosis of primary leptomeningeal melanoma was made, and the patient subsequently received interferon therapy. To date (2 years postoperatively), no local or systemic recurrence of the tumor has been identified.

Conclusion As with most rare tumors, case reports constitute the vast majority of references to PLM. Only an increased awareness and an extensive report of each individual case can help diagnose and clarify the nature of PLM. Clinicians need to be aware of such malignant conditions when diagnosing benign tumoral lesions of the spine such as meningiomas.


Keywords

CSF analysis - histology - meningioma - misdiagnosis - MRI characteristics - primary leptomeningeal melanoma

Background and Importance

Primary leptomeningeal melanoma (PLM) is exceedingly rare, only affecting 1 in 20 million people.[1] It is one of several known melanocytic lesions in the central nervous system (CNS). Since its initial description by Virchow in 1859, ∼ 200 cases have been reported in the literature.[2] [3] PLM is highly malignant and has been described both as a solid and/or diffusely growing tumor.[3] [4] [5] The differential diagnosis of solid leptomeningeal lesions includes benign tumors (e.g., melanocytoma and meningioma) that can be mimicked by PLM.[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] Meningioma is one of the most common neurosurgical conditions, constituting > 20% of primary brain tumors.[6]

Spinal PLM represents both diagnostic and management challenges.[14] [15] We present the rare case of PLM in the ventral cervical spine, and then discuss the diagnosis and management of this lesion as a mimicker of meningioma.


Clinical Presentation

Clinical Summary

A patient in her sixth decade presented with 6 months of intermittent dizziness, slight weakness of the lower extremities, and foot paraesthesias, as well as 4 months of urge incontinence. Apart from essential hypertension, her previous medical history was negative. Physical examination revealed bilateral upper and lower extremity hyperreflexia without obvious paresis, cerebellar signs, or oculovestibular abnormalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected a dural-based extramedullary solid mass ventral to the C2–C3 spinal cord causing spinal cord compression without cord signal changes ([Fig. 1A–C]). The tumor appeared isointense on T1- and hyperintense on T2-weighted images with homogeneous contrast enhancement, characteristic of meningioma. Communicating hydrocephalus was also noted. Surgical resection was planned for a suspected ventral spine meningioma.

Zoom
Fig. 1 (A–C) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an intradural extramedullary solid mass anterior to the C2–C3 spinal cord causing spinal cord compression. (D) Postoperative MRI showed no residual tumor or contrast enhancement.

Operation and Postoperative Course

A right-sided posterolateral approach was performed to expose the lesion. Intraoperative microscopic inspection revealed numerous black spots littering the surface of the dura; the tumor itself was yellow in appearance and had a soft consistency ([Fig. 2]). Gross total resection was achieved, and postoperative MRI displayed no residual tumor or contrast enhancement ([Fig. 1D]). Postoperatively, the patient's symptoms resolved completely, and she had an uncomplicated hospital course. Pathologic analysis of the specimen revealed a malignant melanin-containing tumor, which led to a thorough organ system evaluation to find the primary lesion. No primary site was found, so a diagnosis of primary leptomeningeal melanoma was made and the patient subsequently received interferon therapy. Two years postoperatively, no local or systemic recurrence of the tumor has been identified.

Zoom
Fig. 2 (A) Intraoperatively the dura was littered with black spots. (B) The tumor itself was yellow with a soft consistency.


Discussion

Clinical Evaluation

PLM is not associated with specific clinical symptoms.[16] [17] In the present case, the patient's main complaints were due to tumor location and size, as others have also documented.[2] [18] Communicating hydrocephalus with associated intracranial hypertension seem to be common clinical features of melanocytic lesions in the CNS.[2] [3] [9] [15] [19] [20] [21] [22] Although the cause remains unclear, intracranial hypertension with communicating hydrocephalus can be the first and only clinical sign of PLM.[15] [23] Communicating hydrocephalus in the setting of diffuse leptomeningeal melanosis can be explained by features of poor CSF resorption.[24] [25] [26] [27] However, there is little evidence to explain the observed communicating hydrocephalus in solid leptomeningeal melanocytic lesions, apart perhaps from locally disrupted CSF circulation.[23] [28] [29] The observed communicating hydrocephalus in this patient was treated by primary tumor resection; we did not measure the intracranial pressure. In 25% of all cases, PLM is seen in conjunction with neurocutaneous melanosis (i.e., large congenital nevi) that may hint at PLM.[20] [22] [26] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] Similar to meningioma, the peak age of onset for PLM is in the fifth decade.[2]


Radiology

The radiographic diagnosis of PLM can be problematic.[9] [14] [17] [18] [27] [33] [36] [37] The paramagnetic properties of melanin create hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images and isointense signal on T2-weighted images, which can be interpreted as intratumoral hemorrhage.[2] [3] [15] [17] [27] PLM and other melanocytic lesions tend to enhance avidly with gadolinium.[27] The present case is radiographically atypical for PLM in that its MRI characteristics more resemble the appearance of amelanotic melanoma without a hemorrhagic component (T1 isointense and T2 hyperintense), which is similar to the appearance of meningioma.[7] [10] [18] The lack of melanin signal on the MRI in this case may be explained by the atypical gross appearance of the tumor (i.e., yellow with black spots on the dura as opposed to a deep brown or black-appearing mass, due to high levels of melanin).[2] [18] [27] The observed PLM was indistinguishable from a meningioma on MRI. Computed tomography imaging is not suitable for distinguishing between PLM and benign lesions like meningioma.[3] [9] [10] [33] 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI)-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or 99mTc-hexamethylproyleneamine oxime (HMPAO)-SPECT may be useful adjuncts to MR imaging due to increased uptake in malignancies such as PLM compared with normal brain tissue.[17] [27] [33] Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) can also be helpful when trying to differentiate between metastatic melanoma and PLM.[7] Clearly, suspicion of an unusual lesion on MRI or the presence of cutaneous stigmata such as giant nevi would be the only information leading the clinician toward SPECT and PET imaging.


Pathology

Melanocytes can be found not only in skin and mucosal membranes, but also in the leptomeninges, among other locations. All melanocytes can give rise to melanocytic lesions.[2] [3] [10] The value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology in diagnosing PLM is questionable, especially in the early stages of the disease.[3] [4] [16] [17] [23] [27] [36] [38] However, CSF analysis for atypical pigmented cells followed by immunohistochemical analysis with the monoclonal antibody HMB-45 in combination with S-100 protein appear more reliable.[17] [39] [40] PLM is primarily diagnosed by histology at autopsy or by analyzing resected tissue postoperatively.[3] [4] [16] [21] [27] [37] [38] [41] The hallmark histologic features of PLM include positive immunohistochemical staining for HMB-45, S-100 protein, and vimentin as well as negative testing for glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and epithelial membrane antigen[42] that exclude a glial origin and meningioma.[2] [7] [9] [10] [23] In the present case, histology revealed a cellular neoplasm with moderately polymorphic cells with prominent nucleoli and focal deposition of brown pigment. Scattered mitoses were detectable ([Fig. 3A]). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells showed a positive reaction with antibodies HMB-45, Melan-A, and vimentin and a negative reaction with GFAP.[42] MIB-1 staining was 5% in the present case ([Fig. 3B]), which provided conclusive evidence of malignancy and excluded melanocytoma, PLM's benign counterpart. It should be noted that intermediate grades of melanocytic tumors do exist.[5] [7] [9] [23] [31] [43] The absence of an additional tumor source in conjunction with the pathologic findings just described led to the diagnosis of a solitary PLM in this patient.[44]

Zoom
Fig. 3 (A) Histology revealed cell clusters with brown pigmented spots suggestive of a malignant melanoma. (B) MIB-1 staining was 5%.

Treatment and Prognosis

Although PLM has a better prognosis than metastatic melanoma,[10] [18] it is highly malignant and median survival is < 6 months.[3] [15] Diffuse PLM has a worse prognosis than nodular PLM.[17] [21] [36] Gross total resection (GTR) of solid lesions is usually performed and has been assumed to contribute to prolonged survival in many cases, although not all.[2] [3] [5] [8] [10] [11] [13] [14] [29] A possible explanation for the exceptionally poor outcomes, despite successful GTR, may be misdiagnosis of PLM in the setting of actual metastatic melanoma, where the primary tumor (for instance, on the skin) spontaneously regressed and went undetected.[7] These points emphasize the need for a multimodal approach including radiotherapy and intrathecal chemotherapy as has been suggested.[3] [23] [31] [43] [45] The patient in the present case had a GTR followed by interferon therapy. To date (2 years after surgery), there are no clinical or radiologic signs of tumor recurrence. We did not treat the patient's communicating hydrocephalus for two reasons: (1) the patient was symptom free after surgery, and (2) there is a risk of spreading malignant cells into the peritoneal cavity through CSF diversion with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.[2] [31] We have closely monitored this patient both clinically and radiographically based on recommendations in the literature.[43]



Conclusion

As with most rare tumors, case reports constitute the vast majority of references to PLM. Thus no gold standard currently exists for the definitive treatment and follow-up of patients with this diagnosis.[7] [43] Several reasonably valuable tools are available for diagnosing PLM, namely, immunohistochemical CSF analysis, MRI, and SPECT. It is unlikely, however, that CSF analysis or SPECT would be performed if MRI results pointed to the incorrect diagnosis of meningioma. Only an increased awareness through an extensive report of each individual case can help diagnose and clarify the nature of PLM. Clinicians need to be aware of such malignant conditions when diagnosing suspected benign tumoral spine lesions such as meningiomas.



Authors' Contributions

Conception and design of the manuscript: Marx, Fleck, Manwaring, Schroeder. Acquisition of data: all authors. Analysis and interpretation of data: Marx, Fleck, Manwaring, Schroeder. Drafting of the article: Marx, Fleck, Manwaring. Critical review, revision, and approval of the final manuscript: all authors.


Address for correspondence

Sascha Marx, MD
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Greifswald, Sauerbruchstraße
17491 Greifswald
Germany   


  Lizenzen und Reprints
Zoom
Fig. 1 (A–C) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an intradural extramedullary solid mass anterior to the C2–C3 spinal cord causing spinal cord compression. (D) Postoperative MRI showed no residual tumor or contrast enhancement.
Zoom
Fig. 2 (A) Intraoperatively the dura was littered with black spots. (B) The tumor itself was yellow with a soft consistency.
Zoom
Fig. 3 (A) Histology revealed cell clusters with brown pigmented spots suggestive of a malignant melanoma. (B) MIB-1 staining was 5%.