Long-Term Outcome after Adjacent Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Stand-Alone Plasmaphore-Covered Titanium Cages

Abstract

Background Reports on long-term outcome of stand-alone contiguous two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using stand-alone Plasmaphore-coated titanium cages (PCTCs) are rare, and data on follow-ups > 3 years are missing.

Objective To evaluate the long-term outcome of adjacent two-level microsurgical ACDF using stand-alone PCTC.

Patients/Material and Methods A total of 33 consecutive patients presented with cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) underwent contiguous two-level ACDF. Clinical long-term evaluation (mean: 61 ± 14 months) included documentation of neurologic deficits (motor deficits, sensory deficits, reflex status, and gait disturbance), neck pain, and radicular pain. Functional outcome was measured using the Odom criteria, patient-perceived outcome, and evaluation of work status. Radiographs were evaluated to assess intervertebral disc height, subsidence, level of fusion, sagittal balance, and implant position.

Results Surgery was performed at levels C5–C6 and C6–C7 in 30 patients and at C4–C5 and C5–C6 in 3 (mean age: 50.1 ± 7.7 years). Symptoms and neurologic deficits improved as follows: neurologic deficits (pre: 100%; post: 36%), radicular pain (pre: 85%; post: 15%), and neck pain (pre: 94%; post: 33%). Excellent and good functional and subjective outcome was noted in 75%. Cage subsidence was found to be more prominent in the lower (52%) than the upper (36%) mobile cervical segment. Two-level fusion was documented in most patients (n = 29 [88%]). Kyphotic deformity occurred in two cases (n = 2 [6%]).

Conclusions Stand-alone contiguous two-level ACDF using PCPT proved to be effective, yielding good long-term clinical and functional outcomes. The relatively high rate of subsidence did not affect the good clinical and functional long-term outcome.

Keywords

two-level ACDF - stand-alone fusion - Plasmaphore titanium cage - long-term outcome

• References

• 1 Bailey RW, Badgley CE. Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1960; 42-A: 565-594
• 2 Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A (3) 607-624
• 3 Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 1958; 15 (6) 602-617
• 4 Jacobs W, Willems PC, Kruyt M , et al. Systematic review of anterior interbody fusion techniques for single- and double-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Spine 2011; 36 (14) E950-E960
• 5 Alvarez JA, Hardy Jr RW. Anterior cervical discectomy for one- and two-level cervical disc disease: the controversy surrounding the question of whether to fuse, plate, or both. Crit Rev Neurosurg 1999; 9 (4) 234-251
• 6 van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW. A systematic literature review to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervical interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2000; 9 (2) 129-136
• 7 Jacobs WC, Anderson PG, Limbeek J, Willems PC, Pavlov P. Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4) CD004958
• 8 Hermansen A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Peolsson A. A comparison between the carbon fiber cage and the Cloward procedure in cervical spine surgery: a ten- to thirteen-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Spine 2011; 36 (12) 919-925
• 9 Marotta N, Landi A, Tarantino R, Mancarella C, Ruggeri A, Delfini R. Five-year outcome of stand-alone fusion using carbon cages in cervical disc arthrosis. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (1) (Suppl. 01) S8-S12
• 10 Vavruch L, Hedlund R, Javid D, Leszniewski W, Shalabi A. A prospective randomized comparison between the Cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study. Spine 2002; 27 (16) 1694-1701
• 11 Dowd GC, Wirth FP. Anterior cervical discectomy: is fusion necessary?. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (1, Suppl): 8-12
• 12 Topuz K, Colak A, Kaya S , et al. Two-level contiguous cervical disc disease treated with PEEK cages packed with demineralized bone matrix: results of 3-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2009; 18 (2) 238-243
• 13 Zhou J, Xia Q, Dong J , et al. Comparison of stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages and iliac crest autografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (1) 115-122
• 14 Wright IP, Eisenstein SM. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without instrumentation. Spine 2007; 32 (7) 772-774 ; discussion 775
• 15 Yang JJ, Yu CH, Chang BS, Yeom JS, Lee JH, Lee CK. Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (1) 16-23
• 16 Moon HJ, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kwon TH, Chung HS, Park YK. The effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages at two contiguous levels on cervical alignment and outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (3) 559-565
• 17 Joo YH, Lee JW, Kwon KY, Rhee JJ, Lee HK. Comparison of fusion with cage alone and plate instrumentation in two-level cervical degenerative disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48 (4) 342-346
• 18 Iampreechakul P, Srisawat C, Tirakotai W. Stand-alone cervical polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage (cervios) for single to two-level degenerative disc disease. J Med Assoc Thai 2011; 94 (2) 185-192
• 19 Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disk lesions. J Am Med Assoc 1958; 166 (1) 23-28
• 20 Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Nakamura T. Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence. J Clin Neurosci 2008; 15 (9) 1017-1022
• 21 Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J 2007; 7 (2) 205-209
• 22 Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol 2004; 62 (5) 378-385 ; discussion 385–386
• 23 Demircan MN, Kutlay AM, Colak A , et al. Multilevel cervical fusion without plates, screws or autogenous iliac crest bone graft. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14 (8) 723-728
• 24 Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lieu AS , et al. Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2004; 1 (2) 160-167
• 25 Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D. Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J 2003; 12 (5) 513-516
• 26 Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, Delamarter RB. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 2000; 25 (1) 41-45
• 27 Fraser JF, Härtl R. Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (4) 298-303
• 28 Savolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J. A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery 1998; 43 (1) 51-55
• 29 Wu WJ, Jiang LS, Liang Y , et al. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (7) 1374-1382
• 30 Nandoe Tewarie RD, Bartels RH, Peul WC. Long-term outcome after anterior cervical discectomy without fusion. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (9) 1411-1416
• 31 Lowery GL, McDonough RF. The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation. Patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine 1998; 23 (2) 181-186 ; discussion 186–187
• 32 Fujibayashi S, Shikata J, Kamiya N, Tanaka C. Missing anterior cervical plate and screws: a case report. Spine 2000; 25 (17) 2258-2261