Endoscopic-Assisted Facelifting

Vito C. Quatela; Jean-Paul Azzi; Marcelo B. Antunes

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1383559

Facial Plastic Surgery, Table of Contents

Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30(04): 413-421
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383559

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Endoscopic-Assisted Facelifting

Vito C. Quatela

¹Quatela Center for Plastic Surgery, Rochester, New York

,

Jean-Paul Azzi

¹Quatela Center for Plastic Surgery, Rochester, New York

,

Marcelo B. Antunes

²Devenir Aesthetics, Austin, Texas

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Over the past two decades the use of endoscopes for facial rejuvenation gained wide popularity due to its reliable and reproducible results and limitation of the morbidity related to the open approaches. A thorough knowledge of the anatomy is of paramount importance to safely release all the fascial attachments while avoiding injuries to the facial nerve. The authors find the endoscopic forehead midface lift to be a reliable and safe procedure for facial rejuvenation.

Keywords

brow lift - midface lift - endoscopic - facelift

Full Text

References

References
1 Isse NG. Endoscopic forehead lift. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Los Angeles County Society of Plastic Surgeons; 1992; Los Angeles, CA
2 Isse NG. Endoscopic facial rejuvenation: endoforehead, the functional lift. Case reports. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1994; 18 (1) 21-29
3 Core GB, Vasconez LO, Askren C , et al. Coronal face lift with endoscopic techniques. Plast Surg Forum 1992; 15: 227-229
4 Liang M, Narayanan K, Liang M, Narayanan K. Endoscopic ablation of the frontalis and corrugator muscles: a clinical study. Plast Surg Forum 1992; 15: 54-56
5 Hinderer UT, Urriolagoitia F, Vildósola R. The blepharo-periorbitoplasty: anatomical basis. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 18 (5) 437-453
6 Tessier P. Subperiosteal face-lift [in French]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1989; 34 (3) 193-197
7 Psillakis JM, Rumley TO, Camargos A. Subperiosteal approach as an improved concept for correction of the aging face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82 (3) 383-394
8 Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (7) 1321-1333
9 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (7) 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
10 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The retaining system of the face: histologic evaluation of the septal boundaries of the subcutaneous fat compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (5) 1804-1809
11 Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (1) 11-16
12 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89 (3) 441-449 , discussion 450–451
13 Rohrich RJ, Arbique GM, Wong C, Brown S, Pessa JE. The anatomy of suborbicularis fat: implications for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (3) 946-951
14 Charpy A. Le coussinet adipeux du sourcil. Bibl Anat 1909; 19: 47-52
15 May Jr JW, Fearon J, Zingarelli P. Retro-orbicularis oculus fat (ROOF) resection in aesthetic blepharoplasty: a 6-year study in 63 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (4) 682-689
16 Knize DM. The importance of the retaining ligamentous attachments of the forehead for selective eyebrow reshaping and forehead rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (3) 1119-1120
17 Knize DM. Anatomic concepts for brow lift procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (6) 2118-2126
18 Gosain AK, Sewall SR, Yousif NJ. The temporal branch of the facial nerve: how reliably can we predict its path?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (5) 1224-1233 , discussion 1234–1236
19 Pitanguy I, Ramos AS. The frontal branch of the facial nerve: the importance of its variations in face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 38 (4) 352-356
20 Sabini P, Wayne I, Quatela VC. Anatomical guides to precisely localize the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (2) 150-152
21 Liang MD. Temporal approach to corrugator laser ablation. In: Ramirez OM, Daniel RK, , eds. Endoscopic Plastic Surgery. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1996: 28-35
22 Ramirez OM. Endoface-lift: subperiosteal approach. In: Ramirez OM, Daniel RK, , eds. Endoscopic Plastic Surgery. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1996: 109-126
23 Trinei FA, Januszkiewicz J, Nahai F. The sentinel vein: an important reference point for surgery in the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (1) 27-32
24 Quatela VC, Marotta JC. Pitfalls of midface surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (3) 401-409
25 Marotta JC, Quatela VC. Lower eyelid aesthetics after endoscopic forehead midface-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (4) 267-272
26 Keller G, Quatela VC, Antunes MB, Sykes JM, Magill CK, Seth R. Midface lift: panel discussion. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (1) 119-137
27 Quatela VC, Jacono AA. The extended centrolateral endoscopic midface lift. Facial Plast Surg 2003; 19 (2) 199-208
28 Quatela VC, Choe KS. Endobrow-midface lift. Facial Plast Surg 2004; 20 (3) 199-206
29 Ramirez OM. Anchor subperiosteal forehead lift: from open to endoscopic. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (3) 868-871
30 Berkowitz RL, Jacobs DI, Gorman PJ. Brow fixation with the Endotine Forehead device in endoscopic brow lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (6) 1761-1767 , discussion 1768–1770
31 Byrd HS, Burt JD. Achieving aesthetic balance in the brow, eyelids, and midface. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (3) 926-933 , discussion 934–939
32 Fiala TG, Owsley JQ. Use of the Mitek fixation device in endoscopic browlifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (6) 1700-1703
33 Rohrich RJ, Beran SJ. Evolving fixation methods in endoscopically assisted forehead rejuvenation: controversies and rationale. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (6) 1575-1582 , discussion 1583–1584
34 Romo III T, Sclafani AP, Yung RT, McCormick SA, Cocker R, McCormick SU. Endoscopic foreheadplasty: a histologic comparison of periosteal refixation after endoscopic versus bicoronal lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (3) 1111-1117, discussion 1118–1119
35 Sclafani AP, Fozo MS, Romo III T, McCormick SA. Strength and histological characteristics of periosteal fixation to bone after elevation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (1) 63-66
36 Kriet JD, Yang CY, Wang TD, Cook TA. Evaluation of pericranial skull adherence during healing in the rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (1) 67-69
37 Boutros S, Bernard RW, Galiano RD, Addona T, Stokes B, McCarthy JG. The temporal sequence of periosteal attachment after elevation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (6) 1942-1947
38 Isse N, Sayah DN. Evaluation of pericranial skull adherence and periosteal healing in the rabbit model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (2) 164-165