Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2015; 32(01): 026-033
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396961
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Major Bleeding after Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsies: Frequency, Predictors, and Periprocedural Management

Sean A. Kennedy
1   Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Lazar Milovanovic
1   Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Mehran Midia
2   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 March 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Major bleeding remains an uncommon yet potentially devastating complication following percutaneous image-guided biopsy. This article reviews two cases of major bleeding after percutaneous biopsy and discusses the frequency, predictors, and periprocedural management of major postprocedural bleeding.

Keywords

biopsy - bleed - complications - periprocedural management - interventional radiology
 

  • References

  • 1 Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC ; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (7) 969-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hamilton JD, Kumaravel M, Censullo ML, Cohen AM, Kievlan DS, West OC. Multidetector CT evaluation of active extravasation in blunt abdominal and pelvic trauma patients. Radiographics 2008; 28 (6) 1603-1616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Neideen T, Lam M, Brasel KJ. Preinjury beta blockers are associated with increased mortality in geriatric trauma patients. J Trauma 2008; 65 (5) 1016-1020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wall WL. Hypovolemic shock. In: Mullholand MW, Doherty GM, , eds. Complications in Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011: 161-166
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Reichert CM, Weisenthal LM, Klein HG. Delayed hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. J Clin Gastroenterol 1983; 5 (3) 263-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B , et al; Standards of Practice Committee, with Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Endorsement. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23 (6) 727-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jacobs WH, Goldberg SB. Statement on outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci 1989; 34 (3) 322-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD ; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology 2009; 49 (3) 1017-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Grant A, Neuberger J ; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice. Gut 1999; 45 (Suppl. 04) IV1-IV11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Whittier WL, Korbet SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15 (1) 142-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Srámek A, Eikenboom JCJ, Briët E, Vandenbroucke JP, Rosendaal FR. Usefulness of patient interview in bleeding disorders. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155 (13) 1409-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McGillicuddy EA, Maxfield MW, Salameh B, Stein LH, Ahmad U, Longo WE. Bleeding diatheses and preoperative screening. J Surg Educ 2013; 70 (3) 423-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Baron TH, Kamath PS, McBane RD. Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing invasive procedures. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (22) 2113-2124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Segal JB, Dzik WH ; Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Trials Network. Paucity of studies to support that abnormal coagulation test results predict bleeding in the setting of invasive procedures: an evidence-based review. Transfusion 2005; 45 (9) 1413-1425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 West KL, Adamson C, Hoffman M. Prophylactic correction of the international normalized ratio in neurosurgery: a brief review of a brief literature. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (1) 9-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tripodi A, Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, Trotter JF, Sanyal AJ. Review article: the prothrombin time test as a measure of bleeding risk and prognosis in liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26 (2) 141-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stanworth SJ. The evidence-based use of FFP and cryoprecipitate for abnormalities of coagulation tests and clinical coagulopathy. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2007; 179-186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 McCully SP, Fabricant LJ, Kunio NR , et al. The International Normalized Ratio overestimates coagulopathy in stable trauma and surgical patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 75 (6) 947-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ewe K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Dig Dis Sci 1981; 26 (5) 388-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Orfanakis A, Deloughery T. Patients with disorders of thrombosis and hemostasis. Med Clin North Am 2013; 97 (6) 1161-1180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Henley M, Mallett S. Fresh frozen plasma for correction of the international normalized ratio: safe practice?. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2012; 73 (11) 658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yang L, Stanworth S, Hopewell S, Doree C, Murphy M. Is fresh-frozen plasma clinically effective? An update of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transfusion 2012; 52 (8) 1673-1686 , quiz 1673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jones MW, Harvey IA, Owen R. Do children need routine preoperative blood tests and blood cross matching in orthopaedic practice?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1989; 71 (1) 1-3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Baron RM. Point: should coagulopathy be repaired prior to central venous line insertion? Yes: why take chances?. Chest 2012; 141 (5) 1139-1142 , discussion 1145–1146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dillon JF, Simpson KJ, Hayes PC. Liver biopsy bleeding time: an unpredictable event. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1994; 9 (3) 269-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Terjung B, Lemnitzer I, Dumoulin FL , et al. Bleeding complications after percutaneous liver biopsy. An analysis of risk factors. Digestion 2003; 67 (3) 138-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sethi I, Brier M, Dwyer A. Predicting post renal biopsy complications. Semin Dial 2013; 26 (5) 633-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rianthavorn P, Kerr SJ, Chiengthong K. Safety of paediatric percutaneous native kidney biopsy and factors predicting bleeding complications. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014; 19 (3) 143-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Solbiati L, Livraghi T, De Pra L, Ierace T, Masciadri N, Ravetto C. Fine-needle biopsy of hepatic hemangioma with sonographic guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144 (3) 471-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Keshava SN, Mammen T, Surendrababu N, Moses V. Transjugular liver biopsy: what to do and what not to do. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2008; 18 (3) 245-248
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Alotaibi M, Shrouder-Henry J, Amaral J , et al. The positive color Doppler sign post biopsy: effectiveness of US-directed compression in achieving hemostasis. Pediatr Radiol 2011; 41 (3) 362-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kwan SW, Bhargavan M, Kerlan Jr RK, Sunshine JH. Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them. Radiology 2010; 256 (3) 751-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Marshall D, Laberge JM, Firetag B, Miller T, Kerlan RK. The changing face of percutaneous image-guided biopsy: molecular profiling and genomic analysis in current practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (8) 1094-1103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar