Abstract
The protein type most suitable for ingestion during endurance exercise is undefined.
This study compared co-ingestion of either 15 g/h whey or casein hydrolysate with
63 g/h fructose: maltodextrin (0.8:1) on exogenous carbohydrate oxidation, exercise
metabolism and performance. 2 h postprandial, 8 male cyclists ingested either: carbohydrate-only,
carbohydrate-whey hydrolysate, carbohydrate-casein hydrolysate or placebo-water in
a crossover, double-blind design during 2 h of exercise at 60%W
max
followed by a 16-km time trial. Data were evaluated by magnitude-based inferential
statistics. Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation, measured from 13CO2 breath enrichment, was not substantially influenced by co-ingestion of either protein
hydrolysate. However, only co-ingestion of carbohydrate-casein hydrolysate substantially
decreased (98% very likely decrease) total carbohydrate oxidation (mean±SD, 242±44;
258±47; 277±33 g for carbohydrate-casein, carbohydrate-whey and carbohydrate-only,
respectively) and substantially increased (93% likely increase) total fat oxidation
(92±14; 83±27; 73±19 g) compared with carbohydrate-only. Furthermore, only carbohydrate-casein
hydrolysate ingestion resulted in a faster time trial (−3.6%; 90% CI: ±3.2%) compared
with placebo-water (95% likely benefit). However, neither protein hydrolysate enhanced
time trial performance when compared with carbohydrate-only. Under the conditions
of this study, ingesting carbohydrate-casein, but not carbohydrate-whey hydrolysate,
favourably alters metabolism during prolonged moderate-strenuous cycling without substantially
altering cycling performance compared with carbohydrate-only.
Key words
protein hydrolysate - exogenous carbohydrate oxidation - multiple transportable carbohydrates
- endurance exercise - gastrointestinal comfort - cycling time trial