Adhäsion selbstadhäsiver Befestigungszemente an indirekten Restaurationsoberflächen aus Lithiumdisilikat- oder Zirkonoxid-Keramik

Selbstadhäsive Befestigungszemente sind in der Praxis beliebt, da sie keine zusätzliche Vorbehandlung der Zahnhartsubstanzen erfordern. Für den Erfolg einer Zementierung spielt im Praxisalltag die Adhäsion der Restauration eine entscheidende Rolle. Über die Verbundfestigkeit dieser Zemente zu Dentin sind die Untersuchungsergebnisse hinlänglich bekannt, wie aber sieht diese bei den indirekten Restaurationsoberflächen Zirkonoxid und Lithiumdisilikat-Keramik aus? Die nachfolgend vorgestellte In-vitro-Studie untersuchte den Einfluss von Selbst- und Dualhärtung auf die Haftung von unterschiedlichen, handelsüblichen selbstadhäsiven Befestigungszementen auf Zirkonoxid- und Lithiumdisilikat-Keramik vor und nach thermischer Belastung – und kommt zu interessanten Ergebnissen für die Anwendung in der Praxis.

• Literatur

• 1 Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 Suppl): 8S-13S
• 2 Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A et al. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 424-432
• 3 Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 60D-76D
• 4 Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S. Bonding of Restorative Materials to Dentin with Various Luting Agents. Operative Dentistry 2011; 36: 266-273
• 5 Taschner M, Krämer N, Lohbauer U et al. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 535-540
• 6 Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F et al. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 393-398
• 7 Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: A review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003; 89: 268-274
• 8 Lung CYK, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: An overview. Dental Materials 2012; 28: 467-477
• 9 Ho G, Matinlinna J. Insights on Ceramics as Dental Materials. Part II: Chemical Surface Treatments. Silicon 2011; 3: 117-123
• 10 Matinlinna J, Ozcan M, Lassila L et al. Effect of the cross-linking silane concentration in a novel silane system on bonding resin-composite cement. Acta Odontol Scand 2008; 66: 250-255
• 11 Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF et al. The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. J Dent 2014; 42: 90-98
• 12 Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR et al. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: Where are we now?. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 71-82
• 13 Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 725-731
• 14 Heikkinen TT, Lassila LV, Matinlinna JP et al. Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating. Acta Odontol Scand 2007; 65: 241-248
• 15 de Castro HL, Corazza PH, Paes-Júnior TdA et al. Influence of Y-TZP ceramic treatment and different resin cements on bond strength to dentin. Dental Materials 2012; 28: 1191-1197
• 16 Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D et al. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 103-108
• 17 Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements – chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 295-314
• 18 Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Richter B. A practice-based evaluation of the handling of a new self-adhesive universal resin luting material. Int Dent J 2006; 56: 142-146
• 19 Taschner M, Frankenberger R, Garcia-Godoy F et al. IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year. Am J Dent 2009; 22: 55-59
• 20 Schenke F, Federlin M, Hiller K-A et al. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical evaluation of partial ceramic crowns inserted with RelyX Unicem with or without selective enamel etching. Results after 2 years. Clin Oral Invest 2012; 16: 451-461
• 21 Peumans M, Voet M, Munck J et al. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 739-750
• 22 Madruga FC, Ogliari FA, Ramos TS et al. Calcium hydroxide, pH-neutralization and formulation of model self-adhesive resin cements. Dental Materials 2013; 29: 413-418
• 23 Park JW, Ferracane JL. Water Aging Reverses Residual Stresses in Hydrophilic Dental Composites. Journal of Dental Research 2014; 93: 195-200
• 24 Zorzin J, Petschelt A, Ebert J et al. pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dental Materials 2012; 28: 672-679
• 25 Adusei G, Deb S, Nicholson JW et al. Polymerization behavior of an organophosphorus monomer for use in dental restorative materials. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2003; 88: 565-569
• 26 Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E et al. Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dental Materials 2009; 25: 1104-1108
• 27 Cadenaro M, Navarra CO, Antoniolli F et al. The effect of curing mode on extent of polymerization and microhardness of dual-cured, self-adhesive resin cements. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 14-18
• 28 Li J, Li H, Fok AS et al. Multiple correlations of material parameters of light-cured dental composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 829-836
• 29 Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR et al. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1508-1516
• 30 Van Landuyt KL, Nawrot T, Geebelen B et al. How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 723-747
• 31 Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E et al. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 39-43
• 32 Lohbauer U, Zipperle M, Rischka K et al. Hydroxylation of dental zirconia surfaces: characterization and bonding potential. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87: 461-467
• 33 Blatz M, Phark J-H, Ozer F et al. In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Invest 2010; 14: 187-192
• 34 Aguiar TR, Di Francescantonio M, Ambrosano GMB et al. Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 2010; 93B: 122-127
• 35 Aguiar T, Pinto C, Cavalli V et al. Influence of the Curing Mode on Fluoride Ion Release of Self-adhesive Resin Luting Cements in Water or During pH-Cycling Regimen. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 63-70
• 36 Sabatini C, Patel M, D’Silva E. In Vitro Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-adhesive Resin Cements and a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Various Prosthodontic Substrates. Operative Dentistry 2012; 38: 186-196
• 37 Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2013; 110: 402-407