Key words
vitamin D deficiency - rheumatoid arthritis - disease activity
Schlüsselwörter
Vitamin D Mangel - rheumatoide Arthritis - Krankheitsaktivität
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory arthritis, the prevalence
of which is constant across the globe, regardless of geographic location and race,
but there are some exceptions. For instance, in China, the occurrence of RA is somewhat
lower (about 0.3%), whereas it is substantially higher in other groups, such as the
Pima Indians in North America (about 5%) [1]. Likewise, RA seems more common in the North when compared to South Europe [2]. Although the etiology of RA remains a mystery, a variety of studies suggest that
a blend of environmental and genetic factors are responsible; a contribution of either
one is necessary but not sufficient to exactly specify the disease. It is clear that
both genetic and environmental factors affect the prevalence of autoimmune diseases.
Vitamin D is widely recognized as a hormone that is important for calcium homeostasis
and maintenance of skeletal health. Vitamin D also plays a role in the function of
the immune system [3]
[4]. The immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D have been subjected to extensive examination,
leading to recent speculation that it may play a role in selected inflammatory diseases
including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [5]. Vitamin D maintains equilibrium between T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) cells.
Calcitriol (1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D) can inhibit the synthesis of mRNA of macrophages-derived
cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor alpha
(TNF-α), suppress IL-2 secretion of Th1 cells and decrease the antigen-presenting
activity of macrophages to lymphocytes [6]
[7]
[8]. Further, in vivo studies suggest that 1,25(OH)2D3 supplementation prevents the
initiation and progression of inflammatory arthritis (collagen-induced arthritis)
in rodents and prevents experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (a murine model
used to determine the efficacy of drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis) [9]
[10]. Likewise, vitamin D receptors (VDR) are constitutively expressed on activated lymphocytes,
synoviocytes, macrophages, and chondrocytes in the RA lesion [11] while vitamin D metabolites namely; 1,25(OH)2D, 24,25(OH)2D and 25-OH-D are increased
in RA synovial fluid [12]. In at least one epidemiological study, vitamin D intake was inversely associated
with the risk of developing new-onset RA [13], though conflicting results have been reported [14]
[15]. Although investigations of its association with disease activity in RA are limited,
preliminary data suggest that levels of circulating vitamin D are inversely associated
with disease activity in patients of European ancestry with early inflammatory arthritis
[16].
The aim of this study was to assess the vitamin D status in patients with RA and look
for possible correlation with disease activity.
Patients and Methods
Patients
Rheumatoid arthritis patients (n=55) regularly followed up at the outpatient clinic
of Cairo and Assiut University Hospitals were invited to participate in this prospective
study during the period between January 2009 and June 2010. The patient group consists
of 8 males and 47 females with age range from 27–68 years (mean±SD, 43.88±12.78 years).
The inclusion criteria were the following: RA diagnosis according to American College
of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [17], disease onset after 16 years of age, and use of stable medication in the last 3
months. The control group consisted of 25 age and sex-matched healthy volunteers recruited
among university and hospital workers. The control group consists of 4 males and 21
females with age range from 21–62 years (mean±SD, 42.22±10.61 years). The control
group had no rheumatic diseases or other skeletal symptoms based on history and clinical
examination. The exclusion criteria for the patient and control groups were determined
as associating inflammatory intestinal disease (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis),
malnutrition, hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, renal and hepatic diseases, limited
physical activity and medications that might affect bone metabolism and endocrine
system (e. g. thyroxin, anticonvulsants, hormone or vitamin D replacement therapy).
All participants signed the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Ethics
Committee.
Disease activity assessment
In the patient group, age, gender, duration of disease, peripheral joint involvement,
extra-articular involvement, family history, the presence or absence of comorbidity
and medication at enrollment were recorded. Disease activity was assessed according
to the Disease Activity Score including 28 joint counts (DAS28). The evaluations included
tender and swollen joint counts (0–28), pain (0–10), subcutaneous rheumatoid nodules
(present vs. absent). Components of DAS28 are ESR, patient-assessed global score (0–100),
and swollen and tender joint counts (both 0–28). High activity of the disease was
defined as a DAS28>5.1, moderate activity of disease was defined as a 3.2<DAS28≤5.1,
and low activity of disease was defined as a 2.6≤DAS28≤3.2 and remission as a DAS28<2.60
[18]
[19]. Patients were asked to complete the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ,
range 0–3) to measure their functional capacity [20]
[21].
Laboratory tests
Blood samples were obtained in the morning after at least 8-h overnight fasting. 3 ml
venous blood samples were withdrawn from all patients and normal controls on plain
tubes, and then the sera were separated and kept at − 20°C until assay. C-reactive
protein (CRP, mg/dl) was assessed with nephelometric method, and erythrocyte sedimentation
rate (ESR, mm/h) was assessed with Westergren method. Rheumatoid factor (RF, IU/ml)
was determined by the nephelometric method, and RF>20 IU/ml was defined as positive.
25(OH)D plasma levels were measured by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay commercial kit,
according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany).
Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as a 25(OH)-D concentration ≤37.5 nmol/L (15 ng/ml),
a threshold used in previous investigations of older Caucasian populations [22]
[23]
[24]
[25]. Vitamin D deficiency, defined as a 25(OH)D level ≤ 25 nmol/L (10 ng/ml) [26].
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed by SPSS 13.0 software. Data are presented as mean and standard
deviations or number and percentage as appropriate. With the aim of evaluating the
differences between groups, Student’s “t” test for the variables with a normal distribution
and nonparametric Mann-Whitney-U test for the variables with abnormal distribution
were used. While studying the relations between the variables in the patient group,
Pearson correlation test was used for parametric variables and Spearman correlation
test was used for nonparametric variables. A P-value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically
significant.
Results
[Table 1] showed the demographic and clinical characteristics of the RA patients and controls.
No significant difference was found regarding age, gender, sample season, religion,
skin color, skin exposure, history of rickets, dietary vitamin D and breast fed and
serum levels of 25(OH)D between RA patients and controls. 25(OH)D deficiency, insufficiency
and sufficiency were found in 16.00%, 4.00% and 80.00% of controls while, 25(OH)D
insufficiency and sufficiency were found in 21.80 and 78.20% of RA patients with no
significant difference between controls and patients (P<0.918).
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of all studied groups.
Items
|
Controls (n=25)
|
Patients (n=55)
|
Significance
|
age (years)
|
41.16±15.8
|
42.22±10.61
|
0.700
|
|
(27.00–68.00)
|
(21.00–62.00)
|
0.555
|
Gender
|
|
|
0.555
|
male
|
5 (20.00%)
|
8 (14.5%)
|
|
female
|
20 (80.00%)
|
47(85.5%)
|
|
Sampling season
|
|
|
0.580
|
summer-spring
|
20 (80.00%)
|
39 (70.91%)
|
|
autumn-winter
|
5 (20.00%)
|
16 (29.09%)
|
|
Religion
|
|
|
0.560
|
Muslim
|
18 (72.00%)
|
44 (80.00%)
|
|
Christian
|
7 (28.00%)
|
11 (20.00%)
|
|
Skin color
|
|
|
0.100
|
white
|
8 (32.00%)
|
9 (16.36%)
|
|
black
|
17 (68.00%)
|
46 (83.64%)
|
|
Skin exposure
|
|
|
0.098
|
veil
|
15 (60.00%)
|
44 (80.00%)
|
|
no veil
|
10 (40.00%)
|
11 (20.00%)
|
|
History of Rickets
|
|
|
0.500
|
yes
|
5 (20.00%)
|
7 (12.73%)
|
|
no
|
20 (80.00%)
|
48 (87.27%)
|
|
Dietary Vitamin D
|
|
|
|
sufficient
|
22 (88.00%)
|
46 (83.64%)
|
0.700
|
deficient
|
3 (12.00%)
|
9 (16.36%)
|
|
Breastfed
|
|
|
0.400
|
yes
|
24 (96.00%)
|
49 (89.09%)
|
|
no
|
1 (4.00%)
|
6 (10.91%)
|
|
Serum 25 (OH)Vit D (nmol/ml)
|
49.06±20.29 (7.50–80.00)
|
48.66±13.46 (25.00–77.50)
|
0.918
|
25(OH)vit D deficiency (≤25 nmol/L)
|
4 (16.00%)
|
–
|
|
25(OH)vit D insufficiency (>25-≤37.5 nmol/L)
|
1 (4.00%)
|
12 (21.80%)
|
|
25(OH)vit D sufficiency (>37.5 nmol/L)
|
20 (80.00%)
|
43 (78.20%)
|
|
Data are expressed as mean±SD and range or number (%) as appropriate
*Statistically significant value (P<0.05)
[Table 2] showed the clinical, laboratory and treatment characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis
patients. According to DAS28 scoring, 9.10% of patients showed remission (DAS28<2.6),
7.30% showed low disease activity (2.6≤DAS28≤3.2), 63.60% showed moderate activity
(3.2<DAS28≤5.1) and 20.00% showed high disease activity (DAS28>5.1).
Table 2 Clinical, laboratory and treatment characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Items
|
Patients (n= 55)
|
disease duration (years)
|
5.18±4.59 (0.17–18.00)
|
morning stiffness (minutes)
|
50.54±59.20 (0.00–240.00)
|
swollen joints count
|
5.56±5.04 (0.00–20.00)
|
tender joints count
|
6.80±5.93 (0.00–24.00)
|
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)
|
45.89±29.34 (7.00–105.00)
|
DAS28
|
4.03±1.25 (1.80–7.20)
|
remission (DAS28<2.6)
|
5 (9.10%)
|
low disease activity (2.6≤DAS28≤3.2)
|
4 (7.30%)
|
moderate activity (3.2<DAS28≤5.1)
|
35 (63.60%)
|
high disease activity (DAS28>5.1)
|
11 (20.00%)
|
HAQ (range 0–3)
|
1.09±0.56 (0.00–2.50)
|
Drugs
|
|
NSAIDs
|
45 (81.80%)
|
methotrexate
|
40 (72.70%)
|
prednisolone
|
21 (38.2%).
|
leflunamide
|
18 (32.70%).
|
chloroquine
|
31 (56.40%)
|
cyclosporine
|
2 (3.6%)
|
hemoglobin (gram/dL)
|
11.75±1.23 (9.70–14.40)
|
platelets
|
303.11±82.73 (183.00–501.00)
|
total HAQ (range 0–3)
|
1.09±0.56 (0.00–2.50)
|
Data are expressed as mean±SD and range or number (%) as appropriate
DAS28: Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire;
NSAIDs: non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs
Disease duration was significantly longer in patients with moderate disease activity
vs. those with low and high disease activity (P<0.026 and P<0.001, respectively).
Morning stiffness, swollen joints count were higher in patients with moderate disease
activity vs. those with remission (P<0.023 and P<0.009, respectively). 25(OH)D levels
were lower in patients with moderate disease activity vs. those with remission (P<0.014).
Swollen joints count, tender joints count, DAS28 and HAQ were significantly higher
in patients with high disease activity than remission, low disease activity and moderate
disease activity. Tender joints count, DAS28 and HAQ were significantly higher in
patients with moderate disease activity than remission and those with low disease
activity ([Table 3]).
Table 3 Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis patients
based on disease activity status.
Items
|
Remission (DAS28<2.6) (n=5)
|
Low disease activity (2.6 ≤DAS28≤3.2) (n=4)
|
Moderate disease activity (3.2<DAS28≤5.1) (n=35)
|
High disease activity (DAS28>5.1) (n=11)
|
age (years)
|
48.00±14.65
|
34.25±7.09
|
43.46±10.11
|
38.55±9.84
|
|
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
disease duration (years)
|
3.67±3.42
|
1.86±1.4
|
6.84±4.74
|
1.79±2.15
|
|
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
morning stiffness (minutes)
|
5.00±6.12
|
8.75±6.29
|
67.29±64.06
|
32.73±43.38
|
|
|
NS
|
** P=0.02
|
P=0.03
|
swollen joints count
|
0.00±0.00
|
1.25±1.26
|
5.00±3.40
|
11.45±5.91
|
|
|
NS
|
** P=0.05
|
***P=0.000
|
tender joints count
|
0.00±0.00
|
0.75±1.50
|
6.57±4.90
|
12.82±5.44
|
|
|
NS
|
P=0.02
|
***P=0.000
|
DAS28
|
2.13±0.31
|
2.88±0.21
|
4.19±0.55
|
6.15±0.64
|
|
|
P=0.04
|
** P=0.00
|
***P=0.00
|
HAQ (range 0–3)
|
0.43±0.44
|
0.55±0.44
|
1.10±0.46
|
1.59±0.50
|
|
|
P=NS
|
P=0.02
|
*P=0.04
|
vitamin D (nmol/ml)
|
61.90±14.25
|
50.50±5.74
|
46.04±12.85
|
50.32±14.48
|
|
|
NS
|
NS
|
NS
|
Data are expressed as mean±SD. DAS28: Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment;
HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire.*significance vs. remission; **significance
vs. low disease activity; *** significance vs. moderate disease activity
A significant positive correlation was observed between both DAS28 and total questionnaire
HAQ ([Fig. 1]) (r=0.698, P<0.0001), and morning stiffness (MS) with erythrocyte sedimentation
rate (ESR) (r=0.331, P<0.014) ([Fig. 2]).
Fig. 1 A significant positive correlation between (DAS28) and total (HAQ) (r=0.698, P
<0.0001).
Fig. 2 Significant positive correlations between morning stiffness (MS) and erythrocyte
sedimentation rate (ESR) (r=0.331, P<0.014).
[Fig. 3] shows significant positive correlation between number of swollen joints (SJno) and
ESR (r=0.432, P<0.001) and number of tender joints (TJno) (r=0.336, P<0.012).
Fig. 3 Significant positive correlations between number of swollen joints (SJno) and ESR
(r=0.432, P
<0.001) and number of tender joints (TJno) (r=0.336, P
<0.012).
On the other hand, a significant negative correlation was found in RA patients between
25(OH)D and ESR ([Table 4] and [Fig. 4]) while, there is no correlation between 25(OH)D and other measured parameters ([Table 4]).
Fig. 4 A significant negative correlation between 25(OH) vit D and ESR (r=−0.436, P
<0.0001).
Table 4 Correlation between 25(OH) vitamin D and various measured parameters.
Parameters
|
Correlation(r)
|
Significance
|
age (years)
|
0.223
|
0.101
|
disease duration (years)
|
−0.080
|
0.561
|
morning stiffness (minutes)
|
−0.190
|
0.165
|
number of swollen joints
|
−0.190
|
0.164
|
number of tender joints
|
−0.037
|
0.786
|
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h)
|
−0.441(** )
|
0.001
|
HAQ total
|
−0.062
|
0.655
|
DAS28
|
−0.234
|
0.085
|
DAS status
|
−0.059
|
0.670
|
VAS
|
0.01
|
NS
|
DAS28: Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire
Discussion
In this study, vitamin D status was assessed by measuring 25(OH)D, an accurate indicator
of vitamin D levels [8]. 25(OH)D was studied rather than the more active form 1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3),
because reported associations with disease activity have been shown to be stronger
for 25(OH)D [16]. 25(OH)D acts as a substrate for 1,25(OH)2D3, levels of which are also dependent
on calcium and phosphorus status in addition to parathyroid hormone concentrations,
measures not available for the participants in this study.
No significant difference was found between serum levels of 25(OH)D in RA patients
and controls in this study. 25(OH)D deficiency, insufficiency and sufficiency were
found in 16.00, 4.00 and 80.00% of controls, respectively and 25(OH)D insufficiency
and sufficiency were found in 21.80% and 78.20% of RA patients, respectively. In consistence
with our results, Turhanoflu et al. [27] reported that, 25(OH)D levels were not differing between patients with RA and healthy
controls. However, they reported that vitamin D levels were lower in the patients
with RA with high activity than those with low activity. A previous report in Saudi
Arabia found that serum vitamin D levels in RA patients were similar to the healthy
control group. However, significantly lower 25(OH)D values were found in patients
who were poorly responding to treatment, and not in a state of disease remission [28]. Serum vitamin D inadequacy constitutes a largely unrecognized epidemic in many
populations worldwide [29]. However, preliminary studies suggest that low levels of vitamin D may be common
in rheumatoid arthritis [30]
[31]
[32]
[33]. More recently, vitamin D deficiency was found in 42 out of 145 postmenopausal women
with RA in the USA, with the highest prevalence among African Americans [26]
[34]. Preventive treatment with vitamin D of individuals considered at high risk of developing
autoimmune diseases has been proposed [35]. On the other hand, a large epidemiological study did not find any association between
vitamin D intake and the risk developing RA [36].
In this study, a significant negative correlation was found between 25(OH)D and ESR
in RA patients. A few studies reported correlation between disease activity in RA
(expressed as CRP or ESR) and 1,25(OH)2D3 metabolites levels, but not with 25(OH)D
[30]
[32]
[37]. Moreover, some authors reported an inverse relationship between serum levels of
vitamin D metabolites and disease activity or disability in patients with RA or early
inflammatory polyarthritis, although conflicting results have been found [16]
[26]
[32]
[38]. 2 previous studies found no relationship between 25(OH)D and CRP or ESR [30]
[32]. One small open-label intervention study demonstrated reduction in RA disease activity
with 1,25 (OH)2 D supplementation [39]. Turhanoflu et al. [27] reported the relationship between disease activity and vitamin D level, and also
the negative correlation between vitamin D level and DAS28, HAQ, and CRP. Yet, little
is known about how vitamin D intake modifies the development of autoimmune diseases
[40] Mahon et al. [41] described that 1 000 IU/day vitamin D and 800 mg Ca intake increased the anti-inflammatory
transforming growth factor serum levels [41]. Moreover, synthetic vitamin D reduces the severity of the symptoms in RA [38]. RA is an immune-mediated disease, mainly driven Th1 cells. In previous reports,
higher baseline frequencies of circulating Th17 cells and serum levels of interleukin
(IL)-17 were observed in active RA patients than in healthy controls [42]
[43]. Th17 cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of RA [44]. Ranganathan et al. [45] detected that vitamin D deficiency in RA may affect Th17 responses and microvascular
function.
In various animal models, with 1,25(OH)2D3 vitamin treatment in early phase, collagen-induced
arthritis was preventable to a certain extent [9]. With the administration of vitamin D, the progression of arthritis decreased compared
with the untreated control animals. These data obtained from animal models showed
that the VDR ligand along with other factors may control the development of RA [11].
Conclusions
In RA patients, vitamin D deficiency is quite common, but similar to that found in
control subjects; disease activity (expressed as ESR) is inversely related to 25(OH)D
levels.
Our study provides new insights into the vitamin D status in RA patients as well as
healthy people in Egypt.
Limitation
There were a number of limitations in our study. The RA subgroups were small. We could
not properly assess seasonal differences due to the sunny winter during the study
period. The average age of the population is relatively young. Finally, we were unable
to estimate either the dietary calcium intake of our patients, or the prevalence of
lactase deficiency, which may influence ingestion of dairy products and dietary calcium
supply.