Simulation Training in Brain Death Determination

Abstract

Skill in the determination of brain death is traditionally acquired during training in an apprenticeship model. Brain death is not frequently determined, and thus exposure to the techniques used is marginal. Brain death is therefore ideally suited for competency-based education models such as simulation. Simulation can ensure that all trainees have direct experience in brain death determination irrespective of their specialty, program design, or institutional protocol. In this review, the authors discuss the advantages and barriers to simulation and how to develop simulation scenarios for instruction in the determination of brain death. Future research should focus on validation of brain death simulation methods and assessment tools as well as the impact of simulation on performance in clinical practice.

Keywords

brain death - simulation - apnea test - education - intensive care

• References

• 1 Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Erwin PJ, Cook DA. Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2015; 90 (2) 246-256
• 2 Cook DA. How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Med Educ 2014; 48 (8) 750-760
• 3 Greer DM, Varelas PN, Haque S, Wijdicks EF. Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions. Neurology 2008; 70 (4) 284-289
• 4 Shappell CN, Frank JI, Husari K, Sanchez M, Goldenberg F, Ardelt A. Practice variability in brain death determination: a call to action. Neurology 2013; 81 (23) 2009-2014
• 5 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Program and institutional accreditation requirements. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/83/ProgramandInstitutionalAccreditation.aspx . Accessed November 24, 2014
• 6 United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties. Neurocritical Care Core Curriculum. Available at: https://www.ucns.org/globals/axon/assets/3673.pdf . Accessed November 24, 2014
• 7 United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties. Neurocritical Care Program Requirements. Available at: https://www.ucns.org/globals/axon/assets/11334.pdf . Accessed November 24, 2014
• 8 Fessler HE, Addrizzo-Harris D, Beck JM , et al. Entrustable professional activities and curricular milestones for fellowship training in pulmonary and critical care medicine: report of a multisociety working group. Chest 2014; 146 (3) 813-834
• 9 Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM ; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010; 74 (23) 1911-1918
• 10 MacDougall BJ, Robinson JD, Kappus L, Sudikoff SN, Greer DM. Simulation-based training in brain death determination. Neurocrit Care 2014; 21 (3) 383-391
• 11 Sullivan GM. A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3 (2) 119-120 Erratum in: J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(3):446
• 12 The University of Chicago Departments of Neurology and Surgery. Section of Neurocritical Care in partnership with North Shore University Health System Center for Simulation, Technology, and Academic Research (C-Star). University of Chicago International Brain Death Simulation Workshop. Available at: http://events.uchicago.edu/cal/event/showEventMore.rdo;jsessionid=3022A2461AC6E5 1BBE74A27BBA4CFE2.bw02. Accessed November 24, 2014
• 13 The Cleveland Clinic Death by Neurological Criteria Online Course. Available at: https://www.cchs.net/onlinelearning/cometvs10/dncPortal/default.htm . Accessed November 24, 2014
• 14 Fletcher JD, Wind AP. Cost considerations in using simulations for medical training. Mil Med 2013; 178 (10, Suppl): 37-46
• 15 Lazzara EH, Benishek LE, Dietz AS, Salas E, Adriansen DJ. Eight critical factors in creating and implementing a successful simulation program. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2014; 40 (1) 21-29
• 16 McLaughlin SA, Doezema D, Sklar DP. Human simulation in emergency medicine training: a model curriculum. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9 (11) 1310-1318
• 17 University of Washington School of Nursing. Simulation scenario development template. Available at: http://collaborate.uw.edu/sites/default/files/files/ScenarioDevelopmentTemplate.pdf . Accessed November 28, 2014
• 18 Wijdicks EF. Pitfalls and slip-ups in brain death determination. Neurol Res 2013; 35 (2) 169-173
• 19 Wijdicks EFM. Clinical Diagnosis of Brain Death (Video). In: The Comatose Patient. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008
• 20 Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27 (1) 10-28
• 21 Mort TC, Donahue SP. Debriefing: the basics. Available at: http://www.sccm.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/TOC-Simulators.pdf . Accessed November 25, 2014
• 22 ACGME Outcomes Project. 2000. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Available at: http://www.acgme.org . Accessed November 28, 2014