Key words
obstetrics - gynaecology - gynaecological nursing practicum - lack of skilled personnel
- feminisation - medical students
Schlüsselwörter
Frauenheilkunde - Gynäkologie - Pflegepraktikum Gynäkologie - Fachkräftemangel - Feminisierung
- Studierende der Medizin
Introduction
In 2003 Thomas Kopetsch published the 2nd edition of the study “Dem deutschen Gesundheitswesen
gehen die Ärzte aus (The German Health-Care System is Running Out of Doctors)” [1]. Although the number of freshmen in medicine remains constant, the number of graduates
is declining. In 2003 Kopetsch described, somewhat provocatively, that up to 45 %
of all new students of human medicine will finally not end up in the medical care
profession [1]. Today, a decade later, the problem is more acute than ever before even though the
loss of future medical colleagues of 27 % in the year 2010 has gratifyingly declined
[2].
In the meantime, much has been done to promote the recruitment of personnel for the
medical profession, salaries have been increased, working time regulations have been
changed and, last but not least, a stronger representation of the medical fraternity
in their negotiating position has been realised [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The starting point for the changes is to be found above all in a new generation
of younger people entering the job market (the so-called generation Y) [4], [8], [9], [10], [11] and the increasing proportion of women within the medical profession [12]. The health-care system must react flexibly to the changing basic and further training
wishes as well as the professional expectations of the young doctors and increase
its attractiveness [5], [6]. Specialties such as, in particular, gynaecology and obstetrics (GO), paediatrics
and adolescent medicine, and otorhinolaryngology that are principally named by female
medical students as preferred specialties for their future medical occupation are
among the first that will have to be measured against the changing wishes of the new
generation [11], [13], [14]. For this an early orientation is considered to be an important decision criterion
for the young generation. In the process, practica, good lectures, receiving a doctor
title, and finally the experience gained in the practical year (PY) all play a part.
The significance of the nursing practicum in its function as gateway to a specialty
is practically unexplored.
This study presents data about the nursing practicum, the first practical training
step in medical studies. This study is based on a nation-wide questionnaire survey
of medical students on practical training in medical studies in Germany. The presented
results reflect the experiences of the students in gynaecological facilities. Against
the background of the existing shortage of medical personnel in the field of gynaecology,
the authors pose the question as to what influence the first medical practicum – the
nursing practicum – in a gynaecological or, respectively, obstetric facility has on
the later choice of internship (clinical elective).
Early positive practical experiences in the preferred specialty have a positive effect
on the further interest in this discipline [15]. Accordingly, the authors assumed that those students who could imagine taking an
internship in the field of gynaecology and obstetrics were more satisfied with their
practicum than were participants who had not yet decided or who had decided against
the specialty [16]. The results of the present study should provide a stimulus for solution proposals
as to if and how one can interest students for the discipline GO and finally to win
them as physicians in the specialty.
Methods
The working group education (AG Lehre) of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
(DGOU) in cooperation with the Clinic and Polyclinic for Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic
Surgery of the University Hospital Greifswald carried out an online survey from April
to the middle of September 2012 with the help of the system EvaSys Education Suite.
Medical students and approbated graduates of all Germany medical faculties were questioned
about the practical courses during their medical studies (nursing practicum, internships,
practical year [PY]). The questionnaire reached a self-selected group of 9079 medical
students from a non-randomised selection of the actual basic population.
Questionnaire
The subgroup – students who completed their nursing practicum on a gynaecological
ward – considered in detail in this analysis were selectively asked 140 questions.
Selected results from the data set on the nursing practicum are presented. The question
format consisted of predefined simple answers, multiple answers and questions with
a Likert scale from 1 (e.g., “I disagree fully”) to 5 (e.g., “I agree fully”). Free-text
answers were also possible.
The questionnaire comprised a general section (with questions about personal details,
academic progress, preferred specialty, reasons for the choice of subject) and several
special sections that were to be answered according to academic progress and practica
(in this case nursing practicum). In the context of the nursing practicum, questions
were posed regarding integration in the team, learning practical skills, didactics,
acquisition of competences and overall satisfaction.
A fundamental parameter of the study is a comparison of the answering behaviour of
the participants after the nursing practicum with regard to their decision to choose
an internship again in the field of gynaecology and obstetrics. In all evaluation
scales the answers 1 and 2 were grouped together as “unsatisfactory”, 3 as “undecided”
and the answers 4 and 5 as “satisfactory”. To answer the above-mentioned issues those
students who could, after the nursing practicum, imagine choosing an internship in
gynaecology (internship yes “Iy”) were analysed separately from those who decided
against (internship no “In”) or who were undecided (internship perhaps “Ip”). Mean
values (M) given here thus refer to the answering behaviour in the respective groups
(Iy, Ip, In).
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed with the help of Sphinx Plus Survey and SPSS 22.0.
(IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). Besides descriptive statistics, the χ2 test was used for frequencies, for the individual items ([Table 2]) univariate ANOVAs with the between-subject factor groups (Iy vs. Ip vs. In) were
performed.
Table 1 Sociodemographic data of the participants.
|
|
Participants in gynaecological nursing practica
n = 149
|
|
SD = standard deviation
|
|
Age in years (SD)
|
23.2 (3.7)
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
94.9 %
|
|
|
5.1 %
|
|
Family status
|
|
|
|
44.5 %
|
|
|
50.7 %
|
|
|
4.8 %
|
|
Parents in medical profession
|
17.5 %
|
|
Children
|
4.2 %
|
Table 2 Internship in gynaecology. Evaluation of the nursing practicum and group differences.
|
|
Internship in gynaecology/obstetrics
|
|
|
|
Item
|
No
|
Perhaps
|
Yes
|
F
|
Sig.
|
|
Data are average values. Significant analyses are printed in boldface.
|
|
Practical skills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.256
|
4.222
|
4.337
|
0.210
|
0.881
|
|
|
3.846
|
4.222
|
4.185
|
1.933
|
0.148
|
|
|
3.410
|
3.722
|
3.780
|
1.353
|
0.262
|
|
|
4.158
|
4.222
|
4.511
|
2.452
|
0.09
|
|
|
4.282
|
4.389
|
4.522
|
0.953
|
0.388
|
|
Acquisition of competences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.462
|
3.778
|
4.033
|
4.795
|
0.010
|
|
|
3.487
|
3.333
|
3.728
|
1.288
|
0.279
|
|
|
2.205
|
2.611
|
2.593
|
1.827
|
0.165
|
|
|
2.333
|
2.667
|
2.630
|
1.117
|
0.330
|
|
|
2.667
|
2.889
|
3.054
|
1.981
|
0.142
|
|
|
3.128
|
3.389
|
3.793
|
4.873
|
0.009
|
Results
Altogether 149 medical students reported that they had completed their nursing practicum
on a gynaecological or obstetric facility, 94.9 % of them were female. Analysis of
age revealed that the majority of them (67.2 %) were between 20 and 23 years of age
at the time of questioning (see also [Table 1]). 92 (61.7 %) of these students stated that they wanted to take an internship in
gynaecology on account of their gynaecological nursing practicum (Iy); 39 (26.2 %)
did not want to do this (In) and 18 (12.1 %) were undecided (Ip). With regard to the
parameters gender, age and duration of study, there were no significant differences
between the groups (χ2 0.83). At the time of questioning the 149 medical students were enrolled in 33 of
the 36 German medical faculties.
Learning practical skills
Among the participating students 88.3 % stated that they had gained a good or very
good impression of the tasks and competences of nursing personnel during their nursing
practica. This was true for the gained confidence and practice in the performance
and maintenance of hygiene measures (79.5 %) as well as confidence and practice in
monitoring vital parameters (86.3 %).
Altogether, 65.5 % gained confidence and practice in the performance of basic care
measures. Univariate analyses of each of the acquired skills did not reveal any significant
group differences ([Table 2]). However a trend was apparent that those students who were planning for an internship
in GO had acquired more confidence in the monitoring of vital parameters than those
who later did not want to take an internship in GO.
Teaching in nursing practicum
The didactic quality of nursing practica on gynaecological wards was assessed as good
or very good by merely 23.4 % of the students. The concept and structure was assessed
as being rather negative (M = 2.43), as was the poor contact with the instructors
(M = 2.50) and lack of bedside teaching (M = 2.74) ([Fig. 1]). Only about one third of the participants stated that they had achieved the learning
goals of the nursing practicum.
Fig. 1 a and b Mean values (error bars indicate the standard error of the mean value) for individual
items to assess the teaching (a) and satisfaction (b) in the gynaecological nursing practicum, arranged according to answers to the question
“can you imagine also undertaking a later internship in gynaecology?”: “yes” (green
line), “donʼt know” (orange line) and “no” (red line).
Medical students who later intended to take a gynaecological internship assessed the
professional and didactic quality as being significantly better than did those who
subsequently did not plan to take an internship in gynaecology (professional quality:
p < 0.01; didactic quality: p < 0.05). In addition, they reported to have achieved
the learning goals to a higher extent (Iy vs. In: p < 0.05) and to have experienced
more practical orientation in the nursing practicum (Iy vs. In: p < 0.01). In comparison
to the still undecided participants, the Iy group exhibited significantly better ratings
only in the item practical orientation ([Fig. 1]).
Acquisition of competences
The acquisition of practical competences ([Table 2]) was assessed as good or very good by a majority of the students (69.1 %). The same
was true for learning to work independently (63.8 %) and gaining cooperation and team
working abilities (56.4 %). However, 81.8 % of the participants considered the acquisition
of professional problem-solving and analytical abilities to be inadequate as did 80.5 %
the acquisition of interdisciplinary knowledge. The Iy group assessed not only the
acquisition of practical competences (p = 0.01) but also the team work (p = 0.009)
significantly better than did the In group. All further comparisons did not reveal
any significant differences.
Satisfaction
46.3 % of all participants reported that they were on the whole satisfied with the
nursing practica whereby the group Iy gave a significantly better evaluation of the
nursing practica than did the In group (p = 0.002; [Fig. 1]). This is also reflected in the higher willingness to recommend the clinic/ward
in which they undertook the nursing practicum to others (Iy vs. In p = 0.000; Iy vs.
Ip p = 0.016). The parameters on integration into the hospital routine proved to be
very important for the decision to undertake the next practicum, i.e., the internship,
in the same, namely gynaecological, specialty. Altogether 61.7 % of the participants
stated that their integration into the health-care team was good or, respectively,
very good. In the subgroup Iy the rate of not well integrated participants was significantly
lower than that in the In subgroup (p = 0.002). A good or very good ward climate was
confirmed by 54.3 % in group Iy, in contrast to only 43.9 % of group In who assessed
the ward climate as good or very good. Here also there was a significant group difference
(Iy vs. In: p = 0.011). Altogether, 81.1 % of the participants did not consider the
work load to be too high and 65.5 % of the participants did not have to carry out
too many patient-distant tasks. Those participants in nursing practica who could imagine
taking an internship in the same discipline had a more positive total impression than
those who did not want to do an internship in GO (p = 0.003).
Discussion
The shortage of qualified personnel is ubiquitous and training plays a key role in
the recruitment of young medical colleagues. The nursing practica on gynaecological
wards analysed by us are characterised by a predominantly female gender ratio and,
even at such an early stage in medical education, this leads us to expect a feminisation
of the specialty. Two of three students could imagine also taking an internship in
gynaecology on the basis of the good experience in the nursing practicum. Besides
the didactic and professional quality of the training, the high practical orientation
and the acquisition of practical competences, the better achievement of learning goals
and integration in the health-care team all played a major role. These parameters
were shown to be mainly responsible for the fact that satisfaction with the practicum
was assessed positively.
The aim of the nursing practicum is to make the students familiar with the usual daily
routine of nursing care and to introduce them to the operation and organisation of
a hospital (regulations for medical training, ÄAppO 2002, § 6). Furthermore, this
first clinical practicum offers much more, for many medical students it represents
the first longer and formative contact with patients and a hospital. In the authorsʼ
opinion this sensitive first contact cannot be rated high enough since it gives the
discipline a possibility not only to inspire potential new colleagues but also to
discourage them. The present nation-wide overview of opinions of medical students
on nursing practica shows which parameters are important to ensure that participants
remain “loyal” to the discipline. The interviewed participants judged the acquisition
of practical abilities to be very positive on the whole, a sign that the stated objectives
of the ÄAppO have been fulfilled. Even so, important recommendations for action can
be deduced for the specialty to appear as an attractive employment proposition from
the studentsʼ point of view. Thus, integration in the nursing and medical team as
well as close contact with the instructors is at the top of the list of key factors
for a successful education.
Already the high proportion of females (94.9 %) who have completed the GO nursing
practica confirms that even at the start of medical education GO as a specialty is
highly preferred by females. A survey of medical students with regard to their future
choice of specialist medical training revealed similar results. Significantly more
women than men would choose the GO discipline [11], [17], [18], [19], [20]. The proportion of female doctors in the GO field in 2009 was already 56 % and the
proportion of females receiving certification as medical specialists in the GO field
was the highest at 76 % [2]. In 2013 the number of certifications as medical specialists in the field of gynaecology
and obstetrics amounted to 5.8 % of all specialist certifications with a female proportion
of 84 % [21]. This represents an increase of 8 % within the past 4 years. It remains to be seen
whether or not this number will remain so high in the coming years or, respectively,
if it will increase further and if or how it can be influenced.
In the preclinical routine students are in part arbitrarily assigned to the respective
specialties by the nursing management. Since, in GO the students learn their first
nursing-medical steps on a female patient collective, it is perhaps more natural to
assign female students to these nursing practica. Thus it may be assumed, in the case
of central assignment systems that our future female colleagues come into contact
with our discipline more frequently. This possible early selection could have an impact
on the above average female proportion in the specialty [15]. Unfortunately, due to the small number of male participants (n = 8) in our data
set, no robust deductions on their evaluation of the nursing practicum are possible.
Furthermore, a limitation of our results is that they originate from freshmen whose
reasons for choosing a nursing practicum on a gynaecological ward could have been
very heterogeneous and also were not addressed in the questionnaire. This means that
we cannot assume that all students had a professional interest in the choice of practicum
but instead could have been arbitrarily assigned to the respective wards. Against
this background the evaluation of our results leads to the recommendation for an early
involvement of the future colleagues.
Medical studies are often accused of not being able to convey the competences needed
for the later professional life of a physician. The students often experience them
as being a patient distant, theoretical, overloaded collection of unrelated multiple
choice oriented disciplines [22]. On the other hand, medical practica promote the acquisition of practical skills
at the bedside. Students consider the practical activities to be extremely important
as was demonstrated by Dettner et al. in 2010 with the help of a questionnaire among
students in the PY [16].
Besides the good evaluation of the acquisition of practical skills, it is apparent
from the present analysis that one-third of the students reported that they had gained
only an inadequate confidence in performing the general care of patients. The reason
for this could be the lower basic care needs of gynaecological patients as well as
the also strongly reduced demands for basic care in obstetric wards, thus apparently
the acquisition of practical skills is an important parameter for satisfaction in
nursing practica (Spearmanʼs correlation coefficient = 0.51, p = 0.01). Other reasons
for dissatisfaction were the insufficient didactic quality of the training, the lack
of bedside training as well as lack of contact with the instructors, there is room
for improvement here to make the practicum tasks fairer and more attractive from the
traineeʼs and later trainerʼs points of view. Young ambitious employees at the start
of their professional careers will seek an employer who offers them good opportunities
for development, the promise of personal motivation and establishes personal contacts
[23]. A successful employer is characterised by an open personnel culture as well as
an interest in the further development of trainees [22], [23].
On the basis of experience gained in the nursing practicum, the answers with regard
to the interest in wanting to do an internship in gynaecology/obstetrics was of particular
interest since it could be assumed that the studentʼs early (at the beginning of the
medical studies) experience with the discipline could have had an influence on the
later choice of specialist medical training [14]. Accordingly this poses the question as to how the nursing practicum in GO can be
improved.
We have shown that those questioned students who evaluated the training positively
could imagine taking an internship in GO. They reported that they had gained more
practical competences, they assessed team work more positively, they were integrated
in the nursing team and finally they expressed a high satisfaction with the practicum.
It is seen that the acquisition of practical competences is associated with a significantly
higher satisfaction with the nursing practicum ([Fig. 1]). The degree of satisfaction correlates positively with the intention to take a
later internship in GO. Altogether, the presented differences emphasise that a student-oriented
training in the nursing practicum induces a higher and continuing interest in the
discipline.
The Commission “Professional Perspectives in Gynaecology” (Kommission “Berufsperspektiven
in der Frauenheilkunde”) and the Young Forum of the Germany Society for Gynaecology
and Obstetrics (Junges Forum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe)
have already undertaken positive and comprehensive measures, e.g., in the form of
a 15-minute presentation, to increase interest in the discipline [24]. Thus it is intended on the basis of the highly positive resonances from the studentsʼ
side to integrate this in the nation-wide introductory lectures on gynaecology. Furthermore,
the authors consider it to be advisable already early in the course, for example in
the nursing practicum, to begin with the support of potential colleagues. For this
reason they suggest that the teaching content of the nursing practicum be set out
in the form of a learning catalogue and be implemented accordingly [25]. A logbook offers not only the students but also the instructors many more chances
as it formulates a minimum structure. The thus achieved commitment, planning security
and perceptibility of a structure training would be much appreciated by the students
[8], [11], [18].
In addition, we have shown that personal contact with the instructors is very important
for the students. Accordingly, it would be advantageous in analogy to the already
established PY representatives to also implement representatives for the nursing practica.
Especially for those disciplines with a lack of new recruits or unbalanced gender
ratios such as GO [10], [13], [26] an early commitment of students to the specialty can be achieved through a solid
training scheme. Furthermore, it must be realised that the greatest part of the teaching
in the nursing practica is done by nurses. In order to achieve a sustainable improvement
the nursing personnel must be specifically included in the discussions. Integration
of nursing personnel must be followed with the targets of preparing concepts for teaching
and at the same time to increase awareness of the importance of the nursing practica.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the German Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Deutsche Gesellschaft
für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie [DGOU]) for supporting the study with a donation
of 10 000 €. The DGOU as sponsor was not involved in the data acquisition, analyses
or composition of this contribution.
