Neuropediatrics 2015; 46(06): 371-376
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563696
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Testosterone Treatment of Pubertal Delay in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Authors

  • Claire L. Wood

    1   John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
    2   Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Tim D. Cheetham

    2   Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
    3   Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Michela Guglieri

    1   John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Kate Bushby

    1   John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Catherine Owen

    2   Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Helen Johnstone

    2   Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Volker Straub

    1   John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

29 March 2015

27 July 2015

Publication Date:
26 September 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background The outlook for adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) has improved greatly as a result of corticosteroid use, but treatment will compromise growth and delay puberty. Whether exogenous testosterone can promote growth, development, and skeletal health is unclear.

Methods We collected data retrospectively on growth and pubertal response in 14 adolescents with DMD who were treated with testosterone between 2008 and 2014.

Results A total of 14 boys were treated at a median age of 14.5 years. Eight have finished treatment after a mean age of 3.1 years and the feedback from families was generally positive. The mean testicular volume pretreatment was 2.4 and 3.9 mL posttreatment. The mean baseline testosterone concentrations were < 1.0 and 5.4 nmol/L postintervention. Median height velocity increased from 0.45 cm/y before treatment to 3.6 cm/y after the treatment. The mean height gain was 14.2 cm.

Conclusions A broad range of testosterone preparations was used. Testosterone was generally well-liked, but side effects were experienced by some patients and the pubertal growth increment appears to be compromised. Few subjects had adult endogenous testosterone levels posttreatment. Controlled studies are required to determine the most appropriate treatment regimen and the precise impact of testosterone on key outcomes, such as muscle function and bone integrity. Clinicians will then be better placed to advise families about likely benefits and risks.