Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2015; 124(10): 452-457
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564190
Fortbildung – Implantologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der intraorale Scan von Implantaten auf Basis eines Scanbody – Eine Übersicht über Machbarkeit und Grenzen aktueller Systematiken

M. Engelschalk
1   München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 October 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Der intraorale Scan gilt heute in der konventionellen Prothetik als ein verlässlicher und eingeführter Arbeitsablauf. In der Implantatprothetik wird die Digitalisierung fast ausschließlich im Stadium der Modellsituation durchgeführt. Hierbei muss aber der konventionelle Ablauf der intraoralen Abformung mittels Abformpfosten und die sich daran anschließende Modellherstellung weiterhin gegangen werden. Die digitale Umsetzung erfolgt hier nur zur Generierung von CAD/CAM-basierten individuellen Abutments und eventuellem Zahnersatz. Eine Optimierung findet somit nur im Bereich des Designs und der Herstellung des Abutments statt.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in digital workflow of implantology. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e43312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 01) 54-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nayyar N, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109: 210-215
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 395-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Engelschalk M. Intraoral scan with 3M True Deinition, realization with CARES. Starget 2014; 1: 54-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Koutouzis T, Koutouzis G, Gadalla H et al. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 807-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. One abutment at one time: non-removal of an immediate abutment and ist effect on bone healing around subcrestal tapered implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1303-1307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Giménez B, Ozcan M, Martínez-Rus F et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 (Suppl. 01) e54-e64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K et al. Precision of intraoral digital impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hwang Y, Park Y, Kim H et al. The evaluation of working casts prepared from digital impressions. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 655-662
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 916-922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L et al. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow – the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 2119-2125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P et al. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2011; [withdrawn]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010; 38: 553-559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Joda T, Brägger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1304-1306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 916-922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M et al. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1113-1118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ et al. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111: 186-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar