Die digitale Volumentomografie ist das bildgebende Verfahren der Wahl für eine umfassende kieferorthopädische Diagnostik^[*]

• Literatur

• 1 Parashos P, Messer HH. The diffusion of innovation in dentistry: a review using rotary nickel-titanium technology as an example. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101: 395-401
• 2 Steiner C. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 729-755
• 3 Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell Jr WE. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 24-34
• 4 Berco M, Rigali Jr PH, Miner RM et al. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 17.e1-17.e9 discussion, 17-18
• 5 Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO et al. Accuracy and repeatability of anthropometric facial measurements using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011; 48: 623-630
• 6 Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 112-116
• 7 Chang ZC, Hu FC, Lai E et al. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: e289-e297
• 8 Becker A, Chaushu S, Casap-Caspi N. Cone-beam computed tomography and the orthosurgical management of impacted teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141 (Suppl. 03) 14S-18S
• 9 Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S et al. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 93-102
• 10 Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM et al. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 344-349
• 11 Becker A, Chaushu G, Chaushu S. Analysis of failure in the treatment of impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 743-754
• 12 Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S et al. SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium, Willems G. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: e129-e139
• 13 Damstra J, Fourie Z, Ren Y. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 45-50
• 14 Sievers MM, Larson BE, Gaillard PR et al. Asymmetry assessment using cone-beam CT. A Class I and Class II patient comparison. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 410-417
• 15 Alkhader M, Kuribayashi A, Ohbayashi N et al. Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography in temporomandibular joints with soft tissue pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 343-348
• 16 Cevidanes LH, Hajati AK, Paniagua B et al. Quantification of condylar resorption in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 110-117
• 17 Chandrasekharan D, Tahir FT, Kaliaperumal G et al. A protocol for evaluating condylar position in symptomatic TMD patients. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 560-565
• 18 Pliska B, DeRocher M, Larson BE. Incidence of significant findings on CBCT scans of an orthodontic patient population. Northwest Dent 2011; 90: 12-16
• 19 Price JB, Thaw KL, Tyndall DA et al. Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1261-1268
• 20 Ritter L, Lutz J, Neugebauer J et al. Prevalence of pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 634-640
• 21 Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A et al. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 17-24
• 22 Case preparation. American Board of Orthodontics. Verfügbar unter http://www.americanboardortho.com/professionals/clinicalexam/casereportpresentation/preparation/radiographs.aspx Aufgerufen am 26. 12. 2011
• 23 Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1261-1266
• 24 Mol A, Balasundaram A. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 319-324
• 25 Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 252-260
• 26 Baumgaertel S. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 806-811
• 27 Ludwig B, Glasl B, Bowman SJ et al. Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: palatal sites. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 433-441
• 28 Ludwig B, Glasl B, Kinzinger GS et al. Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: vestibular interradicular sites. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 165-173
• 29 Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, Khanal A et al. Correlation of mandibular bone quality with neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49: 552-556
• 30 Torres SR, Chen CS, Leroux BG et al. Fractal dimension evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in patients with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 501-505
• 31 Ye N, Li J, Zhang K et al. The cutting edge. Computer-aided design of a lingual orthodontic appliance using cone-beam computed tomography. J Clin Orthod 2011; 45: 553-559
• 32 Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 139. 1237-1243
• 33 Grünheid T, Kolbeck Schieck JR, Pliska BT et al. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 436-443