J Knee Surg 2016; 29(03): 218-223
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579790
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Gait Using Pneumatic Brace for End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis

Bhaveen H. Kapadia
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Jeffrey Jai Cherian
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Roland Starr
3   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Morad Chughtai
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Steven F. Harwin
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Anil Bhave
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 November 2015

10 February 2016

Publication Date:
10 March 2016 (online)

Abstract

More than 20 million individuals in the United States are affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA), which can lead to altered biomechanics and excessive joint loading. The use of an unloader pneumatic brace with extension assist has been proposed as a nonoperative treatment modality that may improve gait mechanics and correct knee malalignment. We assessed the following parameters in patients who have knee OA treated with and without a brace: (1) changes in temporospatial parameters in gait; (2) knee range of motion, knee extension at heel strike, and foot placement; (3) knee joint moments and impulse; and (4) changes in dynamic stiffness and rate of change of knee flexion during midstance to terminal stance. This 2:1 prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial evaluated 36 patients (24 brace and 12 matching). OA knee patients were randomized to receive either a pneumatic unloader brace or a standard nonoperative treatment regimen as the matching cohort for a 3-month period. They underwent evaluation of gait parameters using a three-dimensional gait analysis system at their initial appointment and at 3 months follow-up. All the testing, pre- and postbracing were performed without wearing the brace to examine for retained effects. Treatment with the brace led to significant improvements versus standard treatment in various gait parameters. Patients in the brace group had improvements in walking speed, knee extension at heel strike, total range of motion, knee joint forces, and rate of knee flexion from midstance to terminal stance when compared with the matching cohort. Knee OA patients who used a pneumatic unloader brace for 3 months for at least 3 hours per day had significant improvements various gait parameters when compared with a standard nonoperative therapy cohort. Braced patients demonstrated gait-modifying affects when not wearing the brace. These results are encouraging and suggest that this device represents a promising treatment modality for knee OA that may improve gait, knee pain, and strength in knee OA patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991-94. J Rheumatol 2006; 33 (11) 2271-2279
  • 2 Losina E, Walensky RP, Reichmann WM , et al. Impact of obesity and knee osteoarthritis on morbidity and mortality in older Americans. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154 (4) 217-226
  • 3 Favre J, Erhart-Hledik JC, Andriacchi TP. Age-related differences in sagittal-plane knee function at heel-strike of walking are increased in osteoarthritic patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22 (3) 464-471
  • 4 Arazpour M, Hutchins SW, Bani MA, Curran S, Aksenov A. The influence of a bespoke unloader knee brace on gait in medial compartment osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014; 38 (5) 379-386
  • 5 Lehil MS, Bozic KJ. Trends in total hip arthroplasty implant utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (10) 1915-1918
  • 6 Johnson AJ, Starr R, Kapadia BH, Bhave A, Mont MA. Gait and clinical improvements with a novel knee brace for knee OA. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (3) 173-178
  • 7 Hrnack SA, Barber FA. Managing the pain of knee osteoarthritis. Phys Sportsmed 2014; 42 (3) 63-70
  • 8 Roque V, Agre M, Barroso J, Brito I. Managing knee ostheoarthritis: efficacy of hyaluronic acid injections. Acta Reumatol Port 2013; 38 (3) 154-161
  • 9 Rosneck J, Higuera CA, Tadross N, Krebs V, Barsoum WK. Managing knee osteoarthritis before and after arthroplasty. Cleve Clin J Med 2007; 74 (9) 663-671
  • 10 Hanypsiak BT, Shaffer BS. Nonoperative treatment of unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36 (4) 401-411
  • 11 Maleki M, Arazpour M, Joghtaei M, Hutchins SW, Aboutorabi A, Pouyan A. The effect of knee orthoses on gait parameters in medial knee compartment osteoarthritis: a literature review. (epub ahead of print) Prosthet Orthot Int 2014;pii: 0309364614547411
  • 12 Lamberg EM, Streb R, Werner M, Kremenic I, Penna J. The 2- and 8-week effects of decompressive brace use in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. (epub ahead of print) Prosthet Orthot Int 2015;pii: doi: 0309364615589537
  • 13 Della Croce U, Crapanzano F, Li L , et al. A preliminary assessment of a novel pneumatic unloading knee brace on the gait mechanics of patients with knee osteoarthritis. PM R 2013; 5 (10) 816-824
  • 14 Moyer RF, Birmingham TB, Bryant DM, Giffin JR, Marriott KA, Leitch KM. Biomechanical effects of valgus knee bracing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23 (2) 178-188
  • 15 Birmingham TB, Kramer JF, Kirkley A, Inglis JT, Spaulding SJ, Vandervoort AA. Knee bracing for medial compartment osteoarthritis: effects on proprioception and postural control. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001; 40 (3) 285-289