Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(01): 082-086
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597899
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Adjuncts to Improve Nasal Reconstruction Results

Shayna Lee Gordon
1   Department of Dermatology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Saint Louis, Missouri
,
Eva A. Hurst
1   Department of Dermatology, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Saint Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 February 2017 (online)

Abstract

The final cosmetic appearance of nasal reconstruction scars is of paramount importance to both the patient and surgeon. Ideal postreconstruction nasal scars are flat and indistinguishable from surrounding skin. Unfortunately, even with meticulous surgical execution, nasal scars can occasionally be suboptimal. Abnormal fibroblast response can lead to hypertrophic nasal scars, and excessive angiogenesis may lead to telangiectasias or an erythematous scar. Imperfect surgical closure or poor postoperative management can lead to surgical outcomes with step-offs, depressions, suture marks, or dyspigmentation. Aesthetically unacceptable nasal scars can cause pruritus, tenderness, pain, sleep disturbance, and anxiety and depression in postsurgical patients. Fortunately, there are several minimally invasive or noninvasive techniques that allow for enhancement and improvement of cosmetic results with minimal risk and associated downtime. This article provides an overview of adjuncts to improve nasal reconstruction with a focus on techniques to be used in the postoperative period. Armed with an understanding of relevant available therapies, skillful surgeons may drastically improve the final cosmesis and outcome of nasal reconstruction scars.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chang CW, Ries WR. Nonoperative techniques for scar management and revision. Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17 (4) 283-288
  • 2 Gold MH. Topical silicone gel sheeting in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. A dermatologic experience. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993; 19 (10) 912-916
  • 3 Bleasdale B, Finnegan S, Murray K, Kelly S, Percival SL. The use of silicone adhesives for scar reduction. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015; 4 (7) 422-430
  • 4 Mustoe TA. Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32 (1) 82-92
  • 5 Gold MH, Foster TD, Adair MA, Burlison K, Lewis T. Prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids by the prophylactic use of topical silicone gel sheets following a surgical procedure in an office setting. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (7) 641-644
  • 6 Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ , et al. Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (8) 1017-1025
  • 7 Bloemen MC, van der Veer WM, Ulrich MM, van Zuijlen PP, Niessen FB, Middelkoop E. Prevention and curative management of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns 2009; 35 (4) 463-475
  • 8 Karagoz H, Yuksel F, Ulkur E, Evinc R. Comparison of efficacy of silicone gel, silicone gel sheeting, and topical onion extract including heparin and allantoin for the treatment of postburn hypertrophic scars. Burns 2009; 35 (8) 1097-1103
  • 9 Chernoff WG, Cramer H, Su-Huang S. The efficacy of topical silicone gel elastomers in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, keloid scars, and post-laser exfoliation erythema. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31 (5) 495-500
  • 10 Kim S-M, Choi J-S, Lee J-H, Kim Y-J, Jun Y-J. Prevention of postsurgical scars: comparsion of efficacy and convenience between silicone gel sheet and topical silicone gel. J Korean Med Sci 2014; 29 (Suppl. 03) S249-S253
  • 11 Shin TM, Bordeaux JS. The role of massage in scar management: a literature review. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (3) 414-423
  • 12 Field T, Peck M , Scd, et al. Postburn itching, pain, and psychological symptoms are reduced with massage therapy. J Burn Care Rehabil 2000; 21 (3) 189-193
  • 13 Roques C. Massage applied to scars. Wound Repair Regen 2002; 10 (2) 126-128
  • 14 Sherris DA, Larrabee Jr WF, Murakami CS. Management of scar contractures, hypertrophic scars, and keloids. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28 (5) 1057-1068
  • 15 Su CW, Alizadeh K, Boddie A, Lee RC. The problem scar. Clin Plast Surg 1998; 25 (3) 451-465
  • 16 Ketchum LD, Smith J, Robinson DW, Masters FW. The treatment of hypertrophic scar, keloid and scar contracture by triamcinolone acetonide. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 38 (3) 209-218
  • 17 Ogawa R. The most current algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (2) 557-568
  • 18 Leventhal D, Furr M, Reiter D. Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2006; 8 (6) 362-368
  • 19 Ledon JA, Savas J, Franca K, Chacon A, Nouri K. Intralesional treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars: a review. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39 (12) 1745-1757
  • 20 Gillard M, Wang TS, Boyd CM, Dunn RL, Fader DJ, Johnson TM. Conventional diamond fraise vs manual spot dermabrasion with drywall sanding screen for scars from skin cancer surgery. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138 (8) 1035-1039
  • 21 Jared Christophel J, Elm C, Endrizzi BT, Hilger PA, Zelickson B. A randomized controlled trial of fractional laser therapy and dermabrasion for scar resurfacing. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (4) 595-602
  • 22 Alster T, Zaulyanov L. Laser scar revision: a review. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (2) 131-140
  • 23 Harmon CB, Zelickson BD, Roenigk RK , et al. Dermabrasive scar revision. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural evaluation. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21 (6) 503-508
  • 24 Katz BE, Oca AG. A controlled study of the effectiveness of spot dermabrasion (‘scarabrasion’) on the appearance of surgical scars. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 24 (3) 462-466
  • 25 Yarborough Jr JM. Ablation of facial scars by programmed dermabrasion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1988; 14 (3) 292-294
  • 26 Ammirati CT, Cottingham TJ, Hruza GJ. Immediate postoperative laser resurfacing improves second intention healing on the nose: 5-year experience. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (2) 147-152
  • 27 Goldman MP, Fitzpatrick RE. Laser treatment of scars. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21 (8) 685-687
  • 28 Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP. Energy density and numbers of treatment affect response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars to the 585-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45 (4) 557-565
  • 29 Nouri K, Elsaie ML, Vejjabhinanta V , et al. Comparison of the effects of short- and long-pulse durations when using a 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of new surgical scars. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25 (1) 121-126
  • 30 Brewin MP, Lister TS. Prevention or treatment of hypertrophic burn scarring: a review of when and how to treat with the pulsed dye laser. Burns 2014; 40 (5) 797-804
  • 31 Nouri K, Jimenez GP, Harrison-Balestra C, Elgart GW. 585-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of surgical scars starting on the suture removal day. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29 (1) 65-73 , discussion 73
  • 32 Abergel RP, Meeker CA, Lam TS, Dwyer RM, Lesavoy MA, Uitto J. Control of connective tissue metabolism by lasers: recent developments and future prospects. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 11 (6) 1142-1150
  • 33 Cho SB, Lee JH, Lee SH, Lee SJ, Bang D, Oh SH. Efficacy and safety of 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with low fluence for keloids and hypertrophic scars. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24 (9) 1070-1074
  • 34 Badawi A, Tome MA, Atteya A, Sami N, Morsy IAL. Retrospective analysis of non-ablative scar treatment in dark skin types using the sub-millisecond Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser. Lasers Surg Med 2011; 43 (2) 130-136
  • 35 Tierney E, Mahmoud BH, Srivastava D, Ozog D, Kouba DJ. Treatment of surgical scars with nonablative fractional laser versus pulsed dye laser: a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (8) 1172-1180
  • 36 Kunishige JH, Katz TM, Goldberg LH, Friedman PM. Fractional photothermolysis for the treatment of surgical scars. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 (4) 538-541
  • 37 Glaich AS, Rahman Z, Goldberg LH, Friedman PM. Fractional resurfacing for the treatment of hypopigmented scars: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (3) 289-294 , discussion 293–294
  • 38 Haedersdal M, Moreau KER, Beyer DM, Nymann P, Alsbjørn B. Fractional nonablative 1540.  nm laser resurfacing for thermal burn scars: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41 (3) 189-195
  • 39 Haedersdal M. Fractional ablative CO(2) laser resurfacing improves a thermal burn scar. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23 (11) 1340-1341
  • 40 Geronemus RG. Fractional photothermolysis: current and future applications. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (3) 169-176
  • 41 Thomas WW, Bucky L, Friedman O. Injectables in the nose: facts and controversies. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016; 24 (3) 379-389