Keywords
lateral meningocele - multiple meningoceles - intraspinal meningocele
Introduction
Lateral meningocele syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by the widespread presence
of protrusions of the arachnoid and the dura matter extending laterally through inter-
or intravertebral foramina into the paraspinal, retroperitoneal, or intrathoracic
region. It is a hereditary disorder that primarily affects the connective tissues.
This disorder manifests itself with formations of cysts at different levels of the
central nervous system along with meningeal diverticula protruding through the intervertebral
spaces and filled by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Other clinical findings associated
with the lateral meningocele syndrome include specific facial anomalies, cryptorchidism,
hypotonia and muscle atrophy, scoliosis, restricted joint movements, pectus deformities,
and abdominal hernias. Lateral meningoceles may be unilateral or bilateral (as in
the present case) and may exist as solitary or multiple (as in the present case).
The pathogenesis of lateral meningoceles is complex because symptom onset depends
on the location of the cyst and the meningeal protrusions. So far, lateral meningoceles
have been reported in fewer than 20 patients worldwide[1] and very few patients were managed surgically. Surgical repair of symptomatic lateral
meningocele is difficult and needs to be decided on the basis clinical and radiologic
correlation.
Clinical Report
This 9-year-old boy was brought by his parents with complaints of mid backache, progressive
weakness of both lower limbs, and difficulty in passing urine over the period of 6
months. General examination revealed flattening of the angles of the mandible and
cleft palate. There were no features of Marfan syndrome or neurofibromatosis. His
vitals were stable. There was no breathing difficulty. Higher mental functions appeared
normal. Neurologic examination revealed asymmetric paraparesis (left lower limb power
grade 2/5 and right lower limb grade 3/5) with neurogenic bladder. Power in both upper
limb was normal (grade 5/5).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the dorsolumbar spine with T2-weighted (T2W) sagittal
screening of the entire spine and brain was obtained. There were multiple bilateral
dural outpouching seen in the thoracolumbar region at multiple levels, along bilateral
paraspinal spaces that were extending from the T4–T5 to T12–L1 levels. These were
seen larger in size on left side compared with right with largest measuring 4.8 × 5.4 × 4.9
cm at T11–T12 level. Few of them were seen extending into the paraspinal muscles posteriorly,
especially at T9–T10 and T11–T12 level. There was resultant bilateral neural foramen
widening and posterior scalloping of vertebral bodies. In the thoracic region, these
cysts were seen compressing bilateral posterolateral parietal pleura and adjacent
lung parenchyma with resultant passive lung collapse. All these findings were suggestive
of multiple bilateral lateral meningoceles ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 (A–C) Preoperative MRI of dorsolumbar spine with T2W sequences showing multilevel bilateral
meningoceles. Largest one being on left side.
There was another similar cystic lesion seen in the extramedullary intradural space
from T8 to T12 level. It was multiseptate with possible communication with dural sac
at places. This was significantly compressing and displacing spinal cord anteriorly.
These findings were suggestive of intraspinal meningocele with canal stenosis ([Fig. 2]). Screening MRI of the brain was unremarkable.
Fig. 2 Preoperative MRI of dorsal spine with T2W axial sequence showing intraspinal meningocele
compressing dorsal cord.
After thorough clinical examination and correlation with MRI findings, it was noted
that patient had neurologic deficit due to canal compression at T8 to T12 level. After
the patient underwent all routine preoperative investigations (complete blood count,
renal function tests, etc.), he was planned for surgery.
Intraoperative Findings and Surgical Management
After administration of general anesthesia he was put in prone position. Midline back
incision was taken exposing T6 to L1 spinous processes. Then T6 to L1 laminotomy was
done to expose the dura. The dura was thickened and had multiple layers suggesting
complex intraspinal meningocele. CSF was noted between those dural layers. On either
side of the spinal cord, at some places CSF was seen entering into multiple dural
outpouching through neural foramen forming lateral meningocele. We spilt opened all
layers of the dura longitudinally until we could see the spinal cord; thus canal was
decompressed. Now we had multilayered cut edges of the dura on both sides. On either
side all these dural layers were sutured continuously into a single layer. This ensured
closure of lateral outflow of CSF into dural layers and outpouchings, thus reducing
size of lateral meningoceles. Before final closure of two dural edges, a thecoperitoneal
shunt was inserted.
Postoperative recovery was good without any fresh neurologic deficit. Power in the
lower limb stared improving gradually; the patient started walking with support. He
had symptomatic relief from the back pain. After 1 month, a follow-up MRI of the spine
revealed significant reduction in the size of lateral meningoceles ([Fig. 3]) and satisfactory canal decompression.
Fig. 3 Postoperative MRI of dorsolumbar spine with T2 coronal sequences done showing significant
reduction in size of left-sided lateral meningocele.
Discussion
Lateral or anterior spinal meningoceles are relatively rare congenital anomalies where
protrusion of the dura mater and arachnoid extends laterally through an enlarged intervertebral
foramen into the paraspinal, intrathoracic, or retroperitoneal region. Lateral meningoceles
may be unilateral or bilateral or may be solitary or multiple. Typically, lateral
and anterior meningoceles are occult lesions that are not visible externally. An anterior
defect can form in the vertebral column as a result of faulty embryogenesis. Such
faulty development can also result in coexisting abnormalities in the skin, subcutaneous
tissues, spine, and internal organs. Another important factor that can influence the
development of anterior and lateral spinal meningoceles is the balance between both
the hydrostatic pressure and the pulsations of the CSF, and the resistance of the
arachnoid and dura mater to deformation by such pressure, especially at the intervertebral
foramina. If there is a developmental bony defect, the dura and arachnoid may bulge
out through it.[2]
Lateral meningocele syndrome or Lehman syndrome is characterized by multiple lateral
meningoceles in the absence of neurofibromatosis or Marfan syndrome. It is suggested
that lateral meningocele syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder affecting primarily
the connective tissue with many associated skeletal findings kyphoscoliotic deformities,
joint hypermobility, pectus deformities, craniofacial abnormalities, and vertebral
defects such as hemi vertebrae, scoliosis, absence of neural arches on the affected
side, widening of the spinal canal, and intervertebral foramina.[3]
The clinical manifestations of meningocele closely relate with its size and its relationship
with surrounding structures. The patient may be asymptomatic or can present with back
pain or paraparesis.[4] In contrast, in the setting of a small meningocele, no symptoms can be recorded,
and the lesion may be incidentally diagnosed on a routine chest radiograph. Lateral
meningoceles occur more commonly in females than males. Clinical signs of lateral
meningoceles syndrome usually manifest in fourth or fifth decade of life, although
younger patients have also been reported.[5]
Our patient presented with mid backache and paraparesis that was due to compression
by the meningocele on dorsal spinal cord and exiting nerve roots. Because the child
showed progressive neurological deterioration, we opted surgical management. Dorsal
canal and lateral meningocele were decompressed. Thecoperitoneal shunt helped our
patient in two ways: first, shunting of CSF released the pressure generated in the
intraspinal compartment, thus reducing the size of lateral meningoceles, and second,
it helped avoiding postoperative CSF leak ensuring good healing of closed dural margins.
Because of adequate decompression of canal and intraspinal meningocele, our patient
had remarkable symptomatic improvement.
Castori et al[6] have reported the case of a 55-year-old woman with the lateral meningocele syndrome
who underwent surgery to correct two large lateral meningoceles at the lumbosacral
level, which were supposedly the cause of her pain. However, surgery did not alleviate
her symptoms and only exacerbated the symptoms by causing irreversible nerve damage
with bladder and anorectal dysfunction linked to weakness in lower limbs, hence making
the patient wheelchair bound. This emphasizes the significance of early diagnosis
and surgical treatment of symptomatic patients at earlier age.
MRI of the spine with coronal T2W sequence is one of the best sequences to diagnose
lateral meningocele. CT scan with 3D reconstruction further helps delineate and understand
bony anomalies if present.
Conclusion
Surgical repair is the best option for symptomatic lateral meningocele. In cases of
multiple lateral meningoceles, identifying the location of symptomatic lateral meningocele
is most important to get good clinical outcome. The largest or the most symptomatic
meningocele should be targeted and surgically repaired. Multiple (unilateral or bilateral),
small, asymptomatic lateral meningoceles do not need any treatment. They need to be
followed up regularly. Thecoperitoneal shunt is good adjuvant to surgical repair.