Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33(02): 120-124
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598626
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Aesthetics of the Nasal Dorsum: Proportions, Light, and Shadow

Natalie A. Krane
1   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Jeffrey D. Markey
1   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Lauren B. Moneta
1   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Michael M. Kim
1   Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 April 2017 (online)

Abstract

Due to its central location, the nose plays a prominent role in facial aesthetics. As tastes have shifted and techniques have advanced, the accepted “ideal” appearance and proportions of the nose have evolved over time. By assessing the aesthetics of the nasal dorsum through the use of lines and angles, one can more precisely elucidate a goal for the patient's postoperative nasal shape, which should, in turn, guide the surgeon to execute specific operative maneuvers needed to achieve that contour. In assessing the aesthetics of the nasal dorsum, practitioners calculate and observe aspects such as the paired dorsal aesthetic lines, the nasofrontal angle, and the nasofacial angle. There is also additional consideration given to nasal tip position as this must fit harmoniously with the shape of the dorsum. In contrast to the established aesthetic lines and angles, using nasal geometric polygons for the aesthetic evaluation and development of operative goals in rhinoplasty has recently been described in the literature. Constructed ideals, in the form of proportions, lines, and angles, should be used with caution, as there are many factors to consider in the aesthetic analysis of the nasal dorsum, including ethnic differences, and subjective and changing views of beauty.

 
  • References

  • 1 Adams M. Savage Foes, Noble Warriors, and Frail Remnants: Florida Seminoles in the White Imagination 1865–1934. Orlando: The Florida Historical Quarterly 2009; 87 (3) 420-421
  • 2 McNees E. Punch and the Pope: Three Decades of Anti-Catholic Caricature. Baltimore: Victorian Periodicals Review; 2004. 37(1):22
  • 3 Lavater JC, Holcroft TG. Essays on physiognomy: one hundred physiognomical rules. London: William Tegg & Co; 1878: 456
  • 4 Mace A, Grimes N , eds. Mendelssohn Perspectives. New York: Routledge; 2012: 21
  • 5 Carniol PJ, Ganc DJ, Klinger A. Aesthetic Rejuvenation Challenges and Solutions: A World Perspective. In: Carniol PJ, Monjeit GD, , eds. Aesthetic Rejuvenation Challenges and Solutions: A World Perspective. Essex: Informa Healthcare; 2010. 4
  • 6 Springer IN, Zernial O, Nolke F, Warnke P, Wiltfang JN, Russo PN, Terheyden H, Wolfart S. Gender and nasal shape: measures for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (2) 629
  • 7 Davis R. Rhinoplasty and concepts of facial beauty. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22 (3) 198-203
  • 8 Ridley MB, VanHook SM. Aesthetic Facial Proportions. In: Papel, et al. ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. New York: Thieme publishing; 2002: 102-103
  • 9 Davis RE. Ballenger's Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. Shelton, CT: BC Decker Inc People's Medical Publishing House; 2014: 637-638
  • 10 Guyuron B. Precision Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81 (4) 489-499
  • 11 Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (4) 642
  • 12 Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope 1988; 98 (2) 202-208
  • 13 Constantinides M, Fechner FP. The Large Nose. In: Azizzadeh B, , ed. Master Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011. ; 301–307.
  • 14 Daniel RK (ed) Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Rhinoplasty. Boston: Little, Brown; 1993
  • 15 McArdle A, Young R, Kelly M. Preferences for the white female nasal supratip break. Annals of Plastic Surgery 2012; 68 (4) 366-368
  • 16 Cakir B, Dogan T, Öreroğlu AR, Oreroglu A, Daniel R. Rhinoplasty: surface aesthetics and surgical techniques. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2012; 33 (3) 363-375
  • 17 McCarn KE, Downs BW, Cook TA, Wang TD. The Middle Vault: Upper Lateral Cartilage Modifications. In: Azizzadeh B. Master Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011: 159-168
  • 18 Kutubidze A. Nasal dorsal aesthetic lines and rhinoplasty technical tricks. Plast Aesthet Res 2015; 2: 315-319
  • 19 Roostaeian J, Unger JG, Lee MR, Geissler P, Rohrich RJ. Reconstitution of the nasal dorsum following component dorsal reduction in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (3) 509-518
  • 20 Manavbasi YI, Basaran I. The role of upper lateral cartilage in dorsal reconstruction after hump excision: section 1. Spreader flap modification with asymmetric mattress suture and extension of the spreading effect by cartilage graft. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (4) 487-493
  • 21 Sharafi M, Jalessi M, Adamson P. Newly designed upper lateral cartilage flap for preventing depression of the keystone area in large-nose septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (6) 399-404
  • 22 Daniel RK. Mastering Rhinoplasty: a Comprehensive Atlas of Surgical Techniques. Stuttgart: Springer; 2011: 82
  • 23 Bilen BT, Tenekeci G. Nasal dorsum management using fragmented cartilage grafts. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (7) 1647-1651
  • 24 Kelly MH, Bulstrode NW, Waterhouse N. Versatility of diced cartilage-fascia grafts in dorsal nasal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (6) 1654-1659 , discussion 1654–1659
  • 25 Celik M, Haliloğlu T, Bayçin N. Bone chips and diced cartilage: an anatomically adopted graft for the nasal dorsum. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28 (1) 8-12
  • 26 Daniel RK. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (6) 1883-1891
  • 27 Guerrerosantos J, Trabanino C, Guerrerosantos F. Multifragmented cartilage wrapped with fascia in augmentation rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (3) 804-812 , discussion 813–816
  • 28 Erol OO. The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (6) 2229-2241
  • 29 Gordon CR, Alghoul M, Goldberg JS, Habal MB, Papay F. Diced cartilage grafts wrapped in AlloDerm for dorsal nasal augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (4) 1196-1199
  • 30 Daniel RK. Mastering Rhinoplasty: A Comprehensive Atlas of Surgical Techniques. Stuttgart: Springer; 2011: 72
  • 31 Daniel RK. Hispanic rhinoplasty in the United States, with emphasis on the Mexican American nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (1) 244-256
  • 32 Lam SM. Asian Rhinoplasty. In: Azizzadeh B, , ed. Master Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011: 357-368
  • 33 Stucker FJ, Lian T, Sanders K. African American rhinoplasty. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America 2005; 13 (1) 65-72
  • 34 Cobo R, Numa W. Mestizo Rhinoplasty. In: Azizzadeh B, , ed. Master Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011: 397-414
  • 35 Azizzadeh B, Mashkevich G. Middle Eastern Rhinoplasty. In: Azizzadeh B, , ed. Master Techniques in Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011: 387-396
  • 36 Leong SCL, White PS. A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the healthy Caucasian nose and the aesthetic ideal. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 248-252
  • 37 Nahai F. Your favorite technique: time for a change?. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32: 900-902
  • 38 Nahai F. Evidence-based medicine in aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31: 135-136