J Knee Surg 2018; 31(01): 006-012
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608838
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Knee Position during Surgical Wound Closure in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review

Mhamad Faour
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Nipun Sodhi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Anton Khlopas
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Nicolas S. Piuzzi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Kim L. Stearns
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Viktor E. Krebs
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Carlos A. Higuera
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 September 2017

15 October 2017

Publication Date:
22 November 2017 (online)

Abstract

Study areas concerning maximizing knee range of motion (ROM) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have come under focus by surgeons. Among the perioperative factors that were identified to affect ROM after TKAs is knee position during surgical wound closure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review the impact of knee position during TKA wound closure on: (1) postoperative ROM, (2) wound-related complications, (3) Knee Society Score (KSS), (4) postoperative pain, and (5) muscle strength and home functional recovery. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar using various combinations of the following search terms: “wound closure,” “knee position,” “surgical closure,” and “knee arthroplasty.” The studies were evaluated for outcomes after TKA and stratified based on the knee position at surgical closure. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies were analyzed. The total number of patients included was 516 patients (259 patients in the flexion group and 257 patients in the full extension group). Based on the reviewed literature, wound closure in flexion was associated with significant improvement in ROM recovery at earlier follow-ups after TKA (four positive and three neutral studies), better early postoperative pain scores (two positive and one neutral study), and faster physical recovery (two positive studies) (better muscle strength and early achievement of physical therapy milestones) compared with wound closure in extension. No difference was found between wound closure in flexion compared with closure in extension in terms of long-term ROM recovery, long-term postoperative pain scores, wound-related complications (seven neutral studies), knee function measured by KSS (five neutral studies), or patient satisfactions after TKA. Although the current review is limited by the number of studies that are available in the literature, it demonstrates that overall, compared with extension, surgical wound closure in flexion may provide better ROM, faster recovery, comparable patient satisfaction, and no risk of higher wound complications.

 
  • References

  • 1 Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA. , et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 172-188
  • 2 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 53-60
  • 3 Komnik I, Weiss S, Fantini Pagani CH, Potthast W. Motion analysis of patients after knee arthroplasty during activities of daily living--a systematic review. Gait Posture 2015; 41 (02) 370-377
  • 4 Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T. Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (04) (Suppl. 01) 59-62
  • 5 Murphy M, Journeaux S, Russell T. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (04) 887-893
  • 6 Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (05) 705-711
  • 7 Miyasaka KC, Ranawat CS, Mullaji A. 10- to 20-year followup of total knee arthroplasty for valgus deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; (345) 29-37
  • 8 Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2001; 6 (03) 248-252
  • 9 Hanratty B, Bennett D, Thompson NW, Beverland DE. A randomised controlled trial investigating the effect of posterior capsular stripping on knee flexion and range of motion in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty. Knee 2011; 18 (06) 474-479
  • 10 Moon Y-W, Kim H-J, Ahn H-S, Park C-D, Lee D-H. Comparison of soft tissue balancing, femoral component rotation, and joint line change between the gap balancing and measured resection techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (39) e5006
  • 11 Bade MJ, Kittelson JM, Kohrt WM, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Predicting functional performance and range of motion outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 93 (07) 579-585
  • 12 Schwarzkopf R, Ho J, Quinn JR, Snir N, Mukamel D. Factors influencing discharge destination after total knee arthroplasty: a database analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2016; 7 (02) 95-99
  • 13 Vince KG. Wound closure: healing the collateral damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (11, suppl A): 126-133
  • 14 King TV, Kish G, Eberhart RE, Holzaepfel JL. The “genuflex” skin closure for total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1992; 15 (09) 1057-1058
  • 15 Cerciello S, Morris BJ, Lustig S. , et al. The role of wound closure in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review on knee position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (10) 3306-3312
  • 16 Vince KG, Abdeen A. Wound problems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452 (452) 88-90
  • 17 Şükür E, Öztürkmen Y, Akman YE, Senel A, Azboy İ. The effect of tourniquet and knee position during wound closure after total knee arthroplasty on early recovery of range of motion: a prospective, randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136 (12) 1773-1780
  • 18 Motififard M, Heidari M, Nemati A. No difference between wound closure in extension or flexion for range of motion following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (01) 74-78
  • 19 Wang S, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu J, Huang G. Effect of the knee position during wound closure after total knee arthroplasty on early knee function recovery. J Orthop Surg 2014; 9 (01) 79
  • 20 Kömürcü E, Yüksel HY, Ersöz M. , et al. Effect of surgical closing in total knee arthroplasty at flexion or extension: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 3067-3073
  • 21 Masri BA, Laskin RS, Windsor RE, Haas SB. Knee closure in total knee replacement: a randomized prospective trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (331) 81-86
  • 22 Emerson Jr RH, Ayers C, Head WC, Higgins LL. Surgical closing in primary total knee arthroplasties: flexion versus extension. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (331) 74-80
  • 23 Emerson Jr RH, Ayers C, Higgins LL. Surgical closing in total knee arthroplasty. A series followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (368) 176-181