J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79(06): 447-452
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608870
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiskectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation

Jung-Sup Lee
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jooan Nanoori Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
,
Hyeun-Sung Kim
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Suwon Nanoori Hospital, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
,
Yong-Hun Pee
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jooan Nanoori Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
,
Jee-Soo Jang
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Suwon Nanoori Hospital, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
,
Il-Tae Jang
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Nanoori Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 April 2017

24 August 2017

Publication Date:
14 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective To establish the appropriateness of transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (PELD) by comparing it with open lumbar microdiskectomy (OLM) for surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disk herniation.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients who underwent revision surgery (group A: PELD, 35 cases; group B: OLM, 48 cases) for recurrent lumbar disk herniation between March 2009 and April 2014. All of the patients were followed > 12 months. To evaluate outcomes, we checked the leg and back visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), complications, and recurrence for all patients.

Results The mean improvement of VAS for leg was 5.97 ± 0.98 for group A and 5.62 ± 1.42 for group B (p = 0.194). The mean improvement of VAS for back pain was 2.71 ± 1.30 for group A and 2.29 ± 1.41 for group B (p = 0.168). The mean improvement of ODI scores was 28.86 ± 3.93 for group A and 28.00 ± 4.22 for group B (p = 0.350). Total surgery-related complications were none for group A and nine for group B (p = 0.009). Group A had one subject with surgery-related neurologic symptoms and group B had four (p = 0.391). Recurrence occurred in two patients in group A and seven patients in group B (p = 0.291).

Conclusion PELD and OLM have favorable clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disk herniation, and PELD results in fewer complications compared with OLM. Therefore, PELD may be a better alternative to OLM for patients with recurrent lumbar disk herniation.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 2007; 32 (16) 1735-1747
  • 2 Kim CH, Chung CK, Sohn S, Lee S, Park SB. The surgical outcome and the surgical strategy of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for recurrent disk herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014; 27 (08) 415-422
  • 3 Li X, Hu Z, Cui J. , et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Int J Surg 2016; 27: 8-16
  • 4 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomized study comparing full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009; 22 (02) 122-129
  • 5 Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine 2006; 31 (06) 653-657
  • 6 Javedan S, Sonntag VK. Lumbar disc herniation: microsurgical approach. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (01) 160-162 ; discussion 162–164
  • 7 Lee DY, Shim CS, Ahn Y, Choi YG, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009; 46 (06) 515-521
  • 8 Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, Kim NH. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management. Spine 2001; 26 (06) 672-676
  • 9 Swartz KR, Trost GR. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15 (03) E10
  • 10 Fu TS, Lai PL, Tsai TT, Niu CC, Chen LH, Chen WJ. Long-term results of disc excision for recurrent lumbar disc herniation with or without posterolateral fusion. Spine 2005; 30 (24) 2830-2834
  • 11 Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine 2004; 29 (16) E326-E332
  • 12 Chen Z, Zhao J, Liu A, Yuan J, Li Z. Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (01) 197-201
  • 13 Cinotti G, Gumina S, Giannicola G, Postacchini F. Contralateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Results of discectomy compared with those in primary herniation. Spine 1999; 24 (08) 800-806
  • 14 Le H, Sandhu FA, Fessler RG. Clinical outcomes after minimal-access surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15 (03) E12
  • 15 Chen HC, Lee CH, Wei L, Lui TN, Lin TJ. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar surgery for adjacent segment degeneration and recurrent disc herniation. Neurol Res Int 2015; 2015: 791943
  • 16 Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P. , et al. Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope. Spine 2008; 33 (15) E508-E515
  • 17 Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. A new full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006; 49 (02) 80-87
  • 18 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine 2008; 33 (09) 931-939
  • 19 Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (03) 363-372 ; abstract vi
  • 20 Kim CH, Chung CK, Jahng TA, Yang HJ, Son YJ. Surgical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar diskectomy for recurrent disk herniation after open diskectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012; 25 (05) E125-E133
  • 21 Choi G, Kim JS, Lokhande P, Lee SH. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy by transiliac approach: a case report. Spine 2009; 34 (12) E443-E446
  • 22 Choi G, Lee SH, Raiturker PP, Lee S, Chae YS. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at L5-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (1, Suppl): ONS59-ONS68 ; discussion ONS59–ONS68
  • 23 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 (06) 521-530
  • 24 Dai LY, Zhou Q, Yao WF, Shen L. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy: outcome of repeat discectomy. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (03) 226-231 ; discussion 231
  • 25 Yamashita K, Higashino K, Sakai T. , et al. Revision percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under the local anesthesia for the recurrent lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus in a high class athlete: a case report. J Med Invest 2016; 63 (1–2): 135-139
  • 26 Cinotti G, Roysam GS, Eisenstein SM, Postacchini F. Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation. A prospective, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80 (05) 825-832
  • 27 Morgan-Hough CV, Jones PW, Eisenstein SM. Primary and revision lumbar discectomy. A 16-year review from one centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (06) 871-874
  • 28 Saxler G, Krämer J, Barden B, Kurt A, Pförtner J, Bernsmann K. The long-term clinical sequelae of incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 2005; 30 (20) 2298-2302
  • 29 Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, Miklitz B. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine 2008; 33 (09) 973-978
  • 30 Shin KH, Chang H-G, Rhee NK, Lim KS. Revisional percutaneous full endoscopic disc surgery for recurrent herniation of previous open lumbar discectomy. Asian Spine J 2011; 5 (01) 1-9
  • 31 Osman SG, Nibu K, Panjabi MM, Marsolais EB, Chaudhary R. Transforaminal and posterior decompressions of the lumbar spine. A comparative study of stability and intervertebral foramen area. Spine 1997; 22 (15) 1690-1695
  • 32 Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Baha AG, Fellows B, Damron KS, Barnhill RC. Contribution of facet joints to chronic low back pain in postlumbar laminectomy syndrome: a controlled comparative prevalence evaluation. Pain Physician 2001; 4 (02) 175-180
  • 33 Filippiadis DK, Kelekis A. A review of percutaneous techniques for low back pain and neuralgia: current trends in epidural infiltrations, intervertebral disk and facet joint therapies. Br J Radiol 2016; 89 (1057): 20150357
  • 34 Kelekis AD, Filippiadis DK, Martin J-B, Brountzos E. Standards of practice: quality assurance guidelines for percutaneous treatments of intervertebral discs. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33 (05) 909-913
  • 35 Choi G, Raiturker PP, Kim MJ, Chung DJ, Chae YS, Lee SH. The effect of early isolated lumbar extension exercise program for patients with herniated disc undergoing lumbar discectomy. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (04) 764-772 ; discussion 764–772
  • 36 Kafadar A, Kahraman S, Akbörü M. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy: a critical appraisal. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006; 49 (02) 74-79
  • 37 Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine 2002; 27 (07) 722-731
  • 38 Ikuta K, Tarukado K, Masuda K. Characterization and Risk Factor Analysis for Recurrence Following Microendoscopic Diskectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation. J Neurol Surg A 2017; 78 (02) 154-160