Thromb Haemost 2002; 87(06): 947-952
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613116
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Randomised, Double Blind, Multicentre, Placebo Controlled Study of Sulodexide in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

Sergio Coccheri
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Gaetano Scondotto
2   AUSL Bologna City, Angiology Service and Day Hospital “Mengoli”, Bologna, Italy
,
Giancarlo Agnelli
3   Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy
,
Daniele Aloisi
2   AUSL Bologna City, Angiology Service and Day Hospital “Mengoli”, Bologna, Italy
,
Ernesto Palazzini
4   Medical Department, Alfa Wassermann, Bologna, Italy
,
Villiam Zamboni
4   Medical Department, Alfa Wassermann, Bologna, Italy
,
for the venous arm of the SUAVIS (Sulodexide Arterial Venous Italian Study) Group› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 26 April 2001

Accepted after resubmission 13 February 2002

Publication Date:
08 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Sulodexide, a highly purified glycosaminoglycan, was investigated for treatment of venous leg ulcers. Patients (n = 235) undergoing local treatment including wound care and compression bandaging, were randomised to receive either sulodexide or matching placebo for three months. Primary study endpoint was complete ulcer healing after 2 months; secondary endpoints were ulcer healing at 3 months and the time-course changes of ulcer areas.

The proportion of patients with complete ulcer healing was higher with sulodexide at 2 months (p = 0.018) and 3 months. The “number needed to treat” to obtain one additional patient healed with sulodexide was 7 at 2 months and 5 at 3 months. The changes in ulcer surface area with time were significant for sulodexide only (p = 0.004). Fibrinogen significantly decreased in sulodexide patients (p = 0.006).

In conclusion, sulodexide associated with local treatment proved to be effective and well tolerated in the management of venous leg ulcers.

 
  • References

  • 1 Nicolaides AN. Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: A consensus statement. Circulation 2000; 102: e126-63.
  • 2 Kurz X, Kahn SR, Abenhaim L, Clement D, Norgren L, Baccaglini U, Berard A, Cooke JP, Cornu-Thenard A, Depairon M, Dormandy JA, Durand-Zaleski I, Fowkes GR, Lamping DL, Partsch H, Scurr JH, Zuccarelli F. Chronic venous disorders of the leg: epidemiology, outcomes, diagnosis and management. Consensus Statement. Intern Angiol 1999; 18: 83-102.
  • 3 Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology 1997; 48: 67-9.
  • 4 Dormandy JA. Pathophysiology of venous leg ulceration – an update. Angiology 1997; 48: 71-5.
  • 5 Fletcher A, Cullum N, Sheldon TA. A systemic review of compression treatment for venous leg ulcers. BMJ 1997; 315: 576-80.
  • 6 Gallenkemper G, Schultz-Ehrenburg U. Adjuvant systemic drug therapy in venous ulcers. Curr Probl Dermatol 1999; 27: 153-60.
  • 7 Ofosu FA. Pharmacological actions of sulodexide. Semin Thromb Hemost 1998; 24: 127-38.
  • 8 Harenberg J. Review of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic properties of sulodexide. Med Res Rev 1998; 18: 1-20.
  • 9 Ceriello A, Quatraro A, Marchi E, Barbanti M, Giugliano D. Glycosaminoglycans administration decreases high fibrinogen plasma levels in diabetic patients. Diab Nutr Metab 1993; 06: 1-4.
  • 10 Milani MR, Busutti L, Breccia A. Pharmacokinetics of sulodexide evaluated from 131I-labelled fast-moving heparin after single intravenous and oral administration on man at different doses. Brit J Clin Res 1992; 03: 161-78.
  • 11 Saviano M, Maleti O, Liguori L. Double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentre clinical assessment of the efficacy, tolerability and doseeffect relationship of sulodexide in chronic venous insufficiency. Curr Med Res Opin 1993; 13: 96-108.
  • 12 Scondotto G, Aloisi D, Ferrari P, Martini L. Treatment of venous ulcers with sulodexide. Angiology 1999; 50: 883-9.
  • 13 Vanscheidt W, Heidrich H, Junger M, Rabe E. Guidelines for testing drugs for chronic venous insufficiency. Vasa 2000; 29: 274-8.
  • 14 Guilhou JJ, Dereure O, Marzin L, Ouvry P, Zuccarelli F, Debure C, Van Landuyt H, Gillet-Terver MN, Guillot B, Levesque H, Mignot J, Pillion G, Fevrier B, Dubeaux D. Efficacy of Daflon 500 mg in venous leg ulcer healing: a double-blind, randomized, controlled versus placebo trial in 107 patients. Angiology 1997; 48: 77-85.
  • 15 Glinski W, Chodynicka B, Roszkiewicz J, Bogdanowski T. The beneficial augmentative effect of micronised purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) on the healing of leg ulcers: an open, multicentre, controlled, randomised study. Phlebology 1999; 14: 151-7.
  • 16 Jull AB, Waters J, Arrol B. Oral pentoxifylline for treatment of venous leg ulcers (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Issue 02 2000. Oxford: Update Software; CD001733.
  • 17 Dale JJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Nelson EA, Prescott RJ. Randomised, double blind placebo controlled trial of pentoxifylline in the treatment of venous ulcers. BMJ 1999; 319: 875-8.
  • 18 Layton AM, Ibbotson SH, Davies JA, Goodfield MJ. Randomised trial of oral aspirin for chronic venous leg ulcers. Lancet 1994; 344: 164-5.
  • 19 Belcaro G, Marelli C. Treatment of venous lipodermatosclerosis and ulceration in venous hypertension by elastic compression and fibrinolytic enhancement with defibrotide. Phlebology 1989; 04: 91-106.
  • 20 Rajtar G, Marchi E, De Gaetano G, Cerletti C. Effects of glycosaminoglycans on platelet and leucocyte function: role of N-sulfation. Biochem Pharmacol 1993; 46: 958-60.