Summary
The detection of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in plasmas from patients on oral anticoagulants
is problematic because of their prolonged clotting times. Mixing of patients and normal
plasmas prior to testing for LA is employed to overcome this problem. We investigated
the diagnostic efficacy of silica clotting time (SCT) and dilute Russell viper venom
test (dRVVT) performed at low and high phospholipid concentrations, to diagnose LA
in patients on oral anticoagulants, in comparison with Staclot® LA (Stago) performed with and without hexagonal phospholipids and normal plasma.
Case materials were 114 filtered plasmas from patients on oral anticoagulants with
(n = 62) and without (n = 52) the antiphospholipid syndrome. Plasmas were considered
LA-positive when Staclot® LA (taken as the “gold standard”) was diagnostic for LA. Forty-four plasmas were
positive with Staclot® LA. Forty and 39 of these were also positive with SCT and dRVVT (sensitivity relative
to Staclot® LA was 91% and 89%, respectively). Seventy plasmas were negative with Staclot® LA. Three of these were positive with both SCT and dRVVT (specificity relative to
Staclot® LA was 96%). Kappa values for measure of agreement were 0.87 and 0.85 (p <0.001),
respectively. In conclusion, SCT and dRVVT performed at low and high phospholipid
concentrations without normal plasma can be considered as reliable as Staclot® LA peformed with hexagonal phospholipids and normal plasma to diagnose LA in patients
on oral anticoagulants. Advantages of SCT and dRVVT over Staclot® LA are easy automation, no need for normal plasma and relatively low cost.
Keywords
Lupus anticoagulant - oral anticoagulation - thrombosis