Radiological “Teddy Bear” Sign on CT Imaging to Aid Internal Carotid Artery Localization in Transsphenoidal Pituitary and Anterior Skull Base Surgery

Abstract

Objectives Internal carotid artery (ICA) injury remains a rare but potentially fatal complication of transsphenoidal pituitary or anterior skull base surgery. Preoperative imaging must be scrutinized to minimize risk. On axial computed tomography (CT), the protrusions of the ICAs into the sphenoid resemble a “teddy bear.” This article aims to describe the sign, its grading system (0–2) and quantify its presence.

Design Retrospective review of preoperative CT imaging.

Setting Tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom.

Participants One hundred patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary disease were enrolled.

Main Outcome Measure The presence and grading of the “teddy bear” sign were assessed on preoperative CT imaging.

Results A grade 2 (strongly positive) “teddy bear” sign was identified in 40% at the level of the superior pituitary fossa, 78% at the inferior pituitary fossa, and 59% at the clivus. A grade 1 (intermediate) sign was seen in 23.5, 7.5, and 10% of cases, respectively. In 5% of cases, the sign was grade 0 at all levels—indicating poor intraoperative localization of the ICA.

Conclusion The “teddy bear” sign is a useful preoperative tool for identification of anatomy predisposing patients to a higher risk of ICA injury. Those patients who have an absent or grade 0 “teddy bear” sign require extra care to ensure intraoperative localization of the ICAs which may include the use of neuronavigation or a Doppler probe. A grade 2 sign predicts good intraoperative localization of the ICA intraoperatively to inform the safe lateral limit of sellar bone resection.

Keywords

pituitary disease - pituitary gland - sella bone - sphenoid sinus - endoscopic - paranasal - sella turcica - carotid artery - internal

Ethics Approval

Not required.

• References

• 1 Wang AJ, Zaidi HA, Laws Jr ED. History of endonasal skull base surgery. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60 (04) 441-453
• 2 Schmidt RF, Choudhry OJ, Takkellapati R, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Hermann Schloffer and the origin of transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (02) E5
• 3 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, de Divitiis E. Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (02) 293-298
• 4 Roux FX, Page P, Nataf F, Devaux B, Djian MC, Joly LM. The endonasal approach to pituitary adenomas: experience in 105 procedures [in French]. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2002; 63 (03) 187-192
• 5 White DR, Sonnenburg RE, Ewend MG, Senior BA. Safety of minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) compared with a traditional approach. Laryngoscope 2004; 114 (11) 1945-1948
• 6 Dusick JR, Esposito F, Mattozo CA, Chaloner C, McArthur DL, Kelly DF. Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: the patient's perspective-survey results from 259 patients. Surg Neurol 2006; 65 (04) 332-341 , discussion 341–342
• 7 Ceylan S, Koc K, Anik I. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (01) 99-107
• 8 Gondim JA, Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LA, Gomes E, Schops M, Mota JI. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery in elderly patients with pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (01) 31-38
• 9 Cote DJ, Dasenbrock HH, Muskens IS. , et al. Readmission and other adverse events after transsphenoidal surgery: prevalence, timing and predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224 (05) 971-979
• 10 Onesti ST, Post KD. Complications in transsphenoidal microsurgery. In: Post KD, Friedman E, McCormick P. , eds. Postoperative Complications in Intracranial Neurosurgery. New York: Thieme; 1993: 61-73
• 11 Thapar K, Laws ER. Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Tumours. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2001
• 12 Locatelli M, Di Cristofori A, Draghi R. , et al. Is complex sphenoidal sinus anatomy a contraindication to a transsphenoidal approach for resection of sellar lesions? Case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2017; 100: 173-179
• 13 Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, Pierce D. Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (02) 225-236 , discussion 236–237
• 14 Dusick JR, Esposito F, Malkasian D, Kelly DF. Avoidance of carotid artery injuries in transsphenoidal surgery with the Doppler probe and micro-hook blades. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (04) (Suppl. 02) 322-328 , discussion 328–329
• 15 Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horowitz MB. Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2013; 73 (2, Suppl Operative): ons261-ons269 , discussion ons269–ons270
• 16 de Lara D, Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, Carrau RL. Application of image guidance in pituitary surgery. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3 (Suppl. 02) S73-S78
• 17 Cheng Y, Zhang H, Su L. , et al. Anatomical study of cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery and its relationship to the structures in sella region. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (02) 622-625
• 18 Feng Y, Zhao JW, Liu M. , et al. Internal carotid artery in the operative plane of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (03) 909-912
• 19 Labib MA, Prevedello DM, Fernandez-Miranda JC. , et al. The medial opticocarotid recess: an anatomic study of an endoscopic “key landmark” for the ventral cranial base. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (1, Suppl Operative): 66-76 , discussion 76
• 20 Labib MA, Prevedello DM, Carrau R. , et al. A road map to the internal carotid artery in expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to the ventral cranial base. Neurosurgery 2014; 10 (Suppl. 03) 448-471 , discussion 471
• 21 D P, Prabhu LV, Kumar A, Pai MM, Kvn D. The anatomical variations in the neurovascular relations of the sphenoid sinus: an evaluation by coronal computed tomography. Turk Neurosurg 2015; 25 (02) 289-293
• 22 Lin BJ, Chung TT, Lin MC. , et al. Quantitative analysis of anatomical relationship between cavernous segment internal carotid artery and pituitary macroadenoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (41) e5027
• 23 Twigg V, Carr SD, Balakumar R, Sinha S, Mirza S. Radiological features for the approach in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. Pituitary 2017; 20 (04) 395-402
• 24 Raymond J, Hardy J, Czepko R, Roy D. Arterial injuries in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma; the role of angiography and endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18 (04) 655-665
• 25 Oskouian RJ, Kelly DF, Laws Jr ER. Vascular injury and transsphenoidal surgery. Front Horm Res 2006; 34: 256-278
• 26 Davoodi M, Saki N, Saki G, Rahim F. Anatomical variations of neurovascular structures adjacent sphenoid sinus by using CT scan. Pak J Biol Sci 2009; 12 (06) 522-525
• 27 Hewaidi G, Omami G. Anatomic variation of sphenoid sinus & related structures in Libyan population: CT scan study. Libyan J Med 2008; 3 (03) 128-133
• 28 Earwaker J. Anatomic variants in sinonasal CT. Radiographics 1993; 13 (02) 381-415
• 29 Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on transsphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base 2008; 18 (01) 9-15
• 30 Mascarella MA, Forghani R, Sirhan D. , et al. Analysis of potential determinants of a reduced intercarotid distance in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151 (1, Suppl): 111
• 31 Hardy J, Wigser SM. Trans-sphenoidal surgery of pituitary fossa tumors with televised radiofluoroscopic control. J Neurosurg 1965; 23 (06) 612-619
• 32 Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Schott W, Nimsky C. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (03) 381-390
• 33 García-Garrigós E, Arenas-Jiménez JJ, Monjas-Cánovas I. , et al. Transsphenoidal approach in endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base lesions: what radiologists and surgeons need to know. Radiographics 2015; 35 (04) 1170-1185
• 34 Mert A, Micko A, Donat M. , et al. An advanced navigation protocol for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S95-S105
• 35 Linsler S, Antes S, Senger S, Oertel J. The use of intraoperative computed tomography navigation in pituitary surgery promises a better intraoperative orientation in special cases. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2016; 7 (04) 598-602
• 36 Mori R, Joki T, Matsuwaki Y, Karagiozov K, Murayama Y, Abe T. Initial experience of real-time intraoperative C-arm computed-tomography-guided navigation surgery for pituitary tumors. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (02) 319-326
• 37 Dolati P, Eichberg D, Golby A, Zamani A, Laws E. Multimodal navigation in endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors using image-based vascular and cranial nerve segmentation: a prospective validation study. World Neurosurg 2016; 95: 406-413
• 38 Ram Z, Bruck B, Hadani M. Ultrasound in pituitary tumor surgery. Pituitary 1999; 2 (02) 133-138