J Knee Surg 2018; 31(09): 875-883
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1615814
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Surgical Management of Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Patellar Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review

Carlos J. Meheux
1   Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Robert A. Jack II
1   Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Patrick C. McCulloch
1   Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
David M. Lintner
1   Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
,
Joshua D. Harris
1   Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

13 June 2017

22 November 2017

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

This study performs a systematic review to determine (1) if a significant difference exists in return to preinjury activity level between one- and two-stage treatment of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and patellar tendon (PT) tears; and (2) if a significant difference exists in the number of postoperative complications between the two differing surgical treatment approaches. A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on PROSPERO. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, and Sport Discus were searched for English language level I–IV evidence studies on either one- (simultaneous) or two-stage (sequential) surgical treatment of simultaneously sustained ipsilateral ACL and PT tears. The approach to initial evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were qualitatively analyzed. Methodological quality assessment of all included studies was completed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to assess quality of evidence and provide strength of recommendation. Statistical analyses were done using Fischer's exact test. Eleven articles (18 patients; 83% males; mean age, 31.1 ± 10.1 years; mean follow-up, 2.2 ± 1.7 years; and mean MINORS 7.8/16) were analyzed. Eight patients had a one-stage procedure (primary PT repair and ACL reconstruction), and 10 patients underwent a two-stage procedure (primary PT repair first followed by ACL reconstruction) with mean 28 ± 45.7 weeks (5 weeks–3 years) between surgeries. The rate for return to preinjury activity level after surgery was not significantly different between one- (88%) and two-stage (100%) (p = 0.444). There was a significantly higher complication rate (p = 0.023) in the one-stage (stiffness, instability, and patella baja) versus two-stage surgery (no complications). There was no significant difference in return to preinjury activity level between one- and two-stage PT repair and ACL reconstruction. However, the one-stage combined surgery had a significantly higher complication rate compared with two-stage surgery. The level of evidence is IV.

Note

All data, figures, tables, and text are original and previously unpublished. The study was conducted at Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, 6445 Main Street, Outpatient Left, Floor 25, Houston, TX 77030.


 
  • References

  • 1 Nielsen AB, Yde J. Epidemiology of acute knee injuries: a prospective hospital investigation. J Trauma 1991; 31 (12) 1644-1648
  • 2 Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J Knee Surg 1991; 4: 3-8
  • 3 Matava MJ. Patellar tendon ruptures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1996; 4 (06) 287-296
  • 4 Siwek CW, Rao JP. Ruptures of the extensor mechanism of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (06) 932-937
  • 5 Failla MJ, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H. , et al. Does extended preoperative rehabilitation influence outcomes 2 years after ACL reconstruction? A comparative effectiveness study between the MOON and Delaware-Oslo ACL cohorts. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (10) 2608-2614
  • 6 van Melick N, van Cingel RE, Brooijmans F. , et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50 (24) 1506-1515
  • 7 Kim DK, Hwang JH, Park WH. Effects of 4 weeks preoperative exercise on knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27 (09) 2693-2696
  • 8 Grindem H, Granan LP, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Snyder-Mackler L, Eitzen I. How does a combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programme influence the outcome of ACL reconstruction 2 years after surgery? A comparison between patients in the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49 (06) 385-389
  • 9 Haas SB, Callaway H. Disruptions of the extensor mechanism. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23 (04) 687-695
  • 10 Kelly DW, Carter VS, Jobe FW, Kerlan RK. Patellar and quadriceps tendon ruptures--jumper's knee. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (05) 375-380
  • 11 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
  • 12 Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P. , et al. “The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence Levels of Evidence (Introductory Document)”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed August 10, 2016
  • 13 Harris JD, Brand JC, Cote MP, Dhawan A. Research pearls: the significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 3: pearls and pitfalls of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (08) 1594-1602
  • 14 Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73 (09) 712-716
  • 15 Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA. , et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328 (7454): 1490
  • 16 Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48 (01) 9-18
  • 17 van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L. ; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 2003; 28 (12) 1290-1299
  • 18 Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D. , et al. Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions. In: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [posted July 2009]. Rockville, MD. Available at: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/healthInfo.cfm?infotype=rr&ProcessID=60 . Accessed August 10, 2016
  • 19 Tsarouhas A, Iosifidis M, Kotzamitelos D, Traios S. Combined rupture of the patellar tendon, anterior cruciate ligament and lateral. Hippokratia 2011; 15 (02) 178-180
  • 20 Koukoulias NE, Koumis P, Papadopoulos A, Kyparlis D, Papastergiou SG. Acute, simultaneous tear of patellar tendon and ACL: possible mechanism of injury and rationality of the two-stage surgical treatment. BMJ Case Rep 2011; 2011: bcr0520114178
  • 21 Costa-Paz M, Muscolo DL, Makino A, Ayerza MA. Simultaneous acute rupture of the patellar tendon and the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (09) 1143
  • 22 Chiang AS, Shin SS, Jazrawi LM, Rose DJ. Simultaneous ipsilateral ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon: a case report. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2005; 62 (3-4): 134-136
  • 23 Futch LA, Garth WP, Folsom GJ, Ogard WK. Acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon in a collegiate athlete. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (01) 112.e1-112 .e4
  • 24 Gülabi D, Erdem M, Bulut G, Sağlam F. Neglected patellar tendon rupture with anterior cruciate ligament rupture and medial collateral ligament partial rupture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014; 48 (02) 231-235
  • 25 Mariani PP, Cerullo G, Iannella G. Simultaneous rupture of the patellar tendon and the anterior cruciate ligament: report of three cases. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (Suppl. 01) S53-S57
  • 26 Levakos Y, Sherman MF, Shelbourne KD, Trakru S, Bonamo JR. Simultaneous rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament and the patellar tendon. Six case reports. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (04) 498-503
  • 27 Chiba K, Takahashi T, Hino K. , et al. Surgical treatment of simultaneous rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament and the patellar tendon. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (Suppl. 01) S40-S44
  • 28 Kim DH, Lee GC, Park SH. Acute simultaneous ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon. Knee Surg Relat Res 2014; 26 (01) 56-60
  • 29 McCormack RG, Dryden PJ. Simultaneous rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon. Clin J Sport Med 1998; 8 (04) 307-309
  • 30 McKinney B, Cherney S, Penna J. Intra-articular knee injuries in patients with knee extensor mechanism ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (07) 633-638
  • 31 Olsson O, Isacsson A, Englund M, Frobell RB. Epidemiology of intra- and peri-articular structural injuries in traumatic knee joint hemarthrosis - data from 1145 consecutive knees with subacute MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24 (11) 1890-1897
  • 32 Wenzl ME, Kirchner R, Seide K, Strametz S, Jürgens C. Quadriceps tendon ruptures-is there a complete functional restitution?. Injury 2004; 35 (09) 922-926