Rebuttal: A problem of calibration in the paper ‘Point of care monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy in children’

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

Thromb Haemost 2005; 93(03): 622
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1616560

Letters to the Editor

Schattauer GmbH

Authors

Steven Craig

¹Anticoagulation and Haematology Research Unit, South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
David Leeming

¹Anticoagulation and Haematology Research Unit, South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
Allan Sidebotham

¹Anticoagulation and Haematology Research Unit, South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
Ken Stevenson

¹Anticoagulation and Haematology Research Unit, South Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK

Received 05 November 2004

Accepted 17 November 2004

Publication Date:
14 December 2017 (online)

References
1 Ignjatovic V, Barnes C, Newall F. et al. Point of care monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy in children: comparison of CoaguChek Plus and Thrombotest methods with venous international normalised ratio. Thromb Haemost 2004; 92: 734-7.

Reference Link Ris
Thieme Connect PubMed Search in Google Scholar
2 Hobbs F, Fitzmaurice D, Murray E. et al. Is the international normalised ratio (INR) reliable? A trial of comparative measurements in hospital laboratory and primary care settings. J Clin Pathol 1999; 52: 494-7.

Reference Link Ris
Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
3 Shiach C, Campbell B, Poller L. et al. Reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing in a community clinic: a randomised crossover comparison with hospital laboratory testing. Br J Haematol 2002; 119: 370-5.

Reference Link Ris
Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar