Rising Expectations: Access to Biomedical Information

Summary

Objective To provide an overview of the expansion in public access to electronic biomedical information over the past two decades, with an emphasis on developments to which the U.S. National Library of Medicine contributed.

Methods Review of the increasingly broad spectrum of webaccessible genomic data, biomedical literature, consumer health information, clinical trials data, and images.

Results The amount of publicly available electronic biomedical information has increased dramatically over the past twenty years. Rising expectations regarding access to biomedical information were stimulated by the spread of the Internet, the World Wide Web, advanced searching and linking techniques. These informatics advances simplified and improved access to electronic information and reduced costs, which enabled inter-organizational collaborations to build and maintain large international information resources and also aided outreach and education efforts The demonstrated benefits of free access to electronic biomedical information encouraged the development of public policies that further increase the amount of information available.

Conclusions Continuing rapid growth of publicly accessible electronic biomedical information presents tremendous opportunities and challenges, including the need to ensure uninterrupted access during disasters or emergencies and to manage digital resources so they remain available for future generations.

 

MissingLinkText

Keywords

Access to information - genetic databases - digital libraries - consumer health information - clinical trials

 

 

MissingLinkText

• References

• 1 Public Collections of DNA and RNA Sequence Reach 100 Gigabases [press release on the Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 2005. Aug 22 [cited 2008 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/news/press_releases/dna_rna_100_gig.html
• 2 Dawid IB. Submission of sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; January; 86 (02) 407.
• 3 Watson JD, Cook-Deegan RM. Origins of the Human Genome Project. FASEB J 1991; Jan; 05 (01) 8-11.
• 4 Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, Kimura M, Tryka K, Bagoutdinov R. et al. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat Genet 2007; Oct; 39 (10) 1181-6.
• 5 National Institutes of Health. Genome Wide Association Studies. Guidance for Developing Data Sharing Plans for GWAS Studies [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2007 Nov. [cited 2008 Feb 27]. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/gwas/gwas_data_sharing_plan.pdf
• 6 National Library of Medicine. Information services for HIV/AIDS: recommendations to the NIH. report of a conference co-sponsored by the National Library of Medicine and NIH office of AIDS research. June 28-30, 1993. [Internet]. NIH publication no. 94-3730, 1994. [cited 2008 Feb 27]. http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/hiv/nihrpt.pdf
• 7 Wallingford KT, Ruffin AB, Ginter KA, Spann ML, Johnson FE, Dutcher GA. et al. Outreach activities of the National Library of Medicine: a five-year review. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1996; Apr; 84 (Suppl. 02) 1-60.
• 8 Haynes RB, McKibbon KA. Grateful Med. MD Comput 1987; Sep-Oct; 04 (05) 47-9 57..
• 9 Woodsmall RM, Lyon-Hartmann B, Siegel ER. editors. MEDLINE on CD-ROM: National Library of Medicine evaluation forum, Bethesda, Maryland. September 23, 1988. Medford, NJ, USA: Learned Information; 1989
• 10 Schott MJ. PubMed enhancements: fulfilling the promise of a great product. Med Ref Serv Q 2004; Winter; 23 (04) 1-11.
• 11 Groen FK. Access to medical knowledge : libraries, digitization, and the public good. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press; 2007
• 12 SPARC, The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition [Internet]. Washington, D.C: SPARC; c2007 [cited 2008 Feb 27]. Available from: http://www.arl.org/sparc/
• 13 Ginsparg P. As we may read. J Neurosci 2006; Sep 20; 26 (38) 9606-8.
• 14 Fox R. E-biomed. J R Soc Med 1999; Sep; 92 (09) 441-2.
• 15 Relman AS. The NIH “E-biomed” proposal-a potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies. N Engl J Med 1999; Jun 10; 340 (23) 1828-9.
• 16 Katikireddi SV. HINARI: bridging the global information divide. BMJ 2004; May 15; 328 (7449): 1190-3.
• 17 Villafuerte-Gálvez J, Curioso WH, Gayoso O. Biomedical journals and global poverty: is HINARI a step backwards?. PLoS Med 2007; Jun; 04 (06) e220.
• 18 National Library of Medicine. NLM Journal Archiving and Interchange Tag Suite.[Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 2007. Nov 1 [cited 2008 Feb 27]. Available from: http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/
• 19 National Institutes of Health. Revised Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting from NIH-Funded Research [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2008 Jan 11 [cited 2008 Feb 27]. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-ODO8-033.html
• 20 Miller N, Lacroix EM, Backus JE. MEDLINEplus: building and maintaining the National Library of Medicine’s consumer health Web service. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000; Jan; 88 (01) 11-7.
• 21 McCray AT. Better access to information about clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2000; Oct 17; 133 (08) 609-14.
• 22 De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R. Ko et al; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. CMAJ 2004; Sep 14; 171 (06) 606-7.
• 23 Gülmezoglu AM, Pang T, Horton R, Dickersin K. WHO facilitates international collaboration in setting standards for clinical trial registration. Lancet 2005; May 28-Jun 3; 365 9474 1829-31.
• 24 Zarin DA, Tse T, Ide NC. Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials. gov between May and October 2005. N Engl J Med 2005; Dec 29; 353 (26) 2779-87.
• 25 Zarin DA, Ide NC, Tse T, Harlan WR, West JC, Lindberg DA. Issues in the registration of clinical trials. JAMA 2007; May 16; 297 (19) 2112-20.
• 26 Ackerman MJ. The Visible Human Project. J Biocommun 1991; 18 (02) 14.
• 27 Yoo TS, Metaxas DN. Open science-combining open data and open source software: medical image analysis with the Insight Toolkit. Med Image Anal 2005; Dec; 09 (06) 503-6.
• 28 Burke C, Patrias K. compilers Visible Human Project [bibliography on the Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2007 May [cited 2008 Mar 08]. (Current bibliographies in medicine; 2007-1). 912 citations from January 1987 through March 2007. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/cbm/visiblehuman2007.html
• 29 Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med 1993; Aug; 32 (04) 281-91.
• 30 Lindberg DA. Research opportunities and challenges in 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (04) 483-6.
• 31 International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation. [Internet] Copenhagen: IHTSDO; c2008 [cited 2008 Mar 08]. Available from: http://www.ihtsdo.org
• 32 Anderson AM, Labay V. Ethical considerations and proposed guidelines for the use of radio frequency identification: especially concerning its use for promoting public safety and national security. Sci Eng Ethics 2006; Apr; 12 (02) 265-72.
• 33 National Library of Medicine. Board of Regents. Charting a course for the 21st century: NLM’s long range plan 2006-2016. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 2006
• 34 Lynch CA. A matter of mission: information technology and the future of higher education. In: Katz R. editor. The tower and the cloud. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. In press; 2008