Yearb Med Inform 2009; 18(01): 23-31
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638633
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

STARE-HI -Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics

J. Talmon
1  Center for Research, Innovation, Support and Policy-CRISP, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
E. Ammenwerth
2  UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
,
J. Brender
3  Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
,
N. de Keizer
4  Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
P. Nykänen
5  Department of Computer Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
,
M. Rigby
6  Centre for Health Planning and Management, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Correspondence to

Jan L. Talmon
Center for Research
Innovation
Support and Policy
Maastricht University
PO Box 616
6200MD Maastricht
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 43 388 2243   

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 March 2018 (online)

 

Summary

Objective Development of guidelines for publication of evaluation studies of Health Informatics applications.

Methods An initial list of issues to be addressed in reports on evaluation studies was drafted based on experiencesas editorsand reviewers and as authors of systematic reviews , taking into account guidelines for reporting of medical research. This list has been discussed in several rounds by an increasing number of experts in Health Informatics evaluation during conferences and by using e-mail.

ResultsA set of STARE-HI principles to be addressed in papers describing evaluations of Health Informatics interventions is presented. These principles include formulation of title and abstract, of introduction (e.g. scientific background, study objectives), study context (e.g. organizational setting, system details), methods (e.g. study design, outcome measures), results (e.g. study findings, unexpected observations)and discussion and conclusion.

Conclusion Acomprehensivelistofprinciplesrelevantforproperlydescribing Health Informatics evaluations has been developed. When manuscripts submitted to Health Informatics journals and general medical journals adhere to these aspects, readers will be better positioned to place the studies in a proper context and judge their validity and generalisability. STARE-HI may also be used for study planning and hence positively influence the quality of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. We believe that better publication of (both quantitative and qualitative) evaluation studies is an important step toward the vision of evidence-based Health Informatics.

Limitations This study is based on experiences from editors, reviewers, authors of systemati c reviews and readers of the scientific literature. The applicability of the principles has not been evaluated in real practice. Only when authors start to use these principles for reporting, shortcomings in the principles will emerge.


#

 


#

Correspondence to

Jan L. Talmon
Center for Research
Innovation
Support and Policy
Maastricht University
PO Box 616
6200MD Maastricht
The Netherlands
Phone: +31 43 388 2243