J Knee Surg 2019; 32(10): 947-952
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672204
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Periprosthetic Fracture following Partial Knee Arthroplasty

Nicholas M. Brown
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
,
Gerard Engh
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic, Alexandria, Virginia
,
Kevin Fricka
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic, Alexandria, Virginia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 December 2017

19 August 2018

Publication Date:
03 October 2018 (online)

Abstract

Partial knee arthroplasty is a procedure with long-term successful outcomes. However, there are several potential complications including retained cement fragments, bearing dislocation, infection, component loosening, medial collateral ligament injury, and overcorrection, leading to progressive arthritis. Periprosthetic fracture is an uncommon complication, with multiple reports showing an incidence of less than 1%. Hence, there are no established algorithms to guide treatment. A consecutive series of 2,464 patients who underwent partial knee arthroplasty between January 2009 and April 2017 was reviewed. We identified 16 patients with early periprosthetic fracture, with an incidence of 0.6%. All of these were tibial fractures, which occurred at a mean of 35 days postoperatively. There were 5 males and 11 females, with an average age of 70 years at the time of surgery. Average follow-up was 62 months. Two patients had contralateral compartment insufficiency fractures that were successfully treated nonoperatively, five patients immediately underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and nine patients underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Two of these cases had a failed ORIF and required conversion to TKA. Seven patients were successfully treated with a medial buttress plate in compression. Average Knee Society Score at final follow-up was 81, and average flexion was 115 degrees, with no patients having greater than 5-degree flexion contracture. Periprosthetic fracture following partial knee arthroplasty resulted in a high rate of conversion TKA. However, ORIF in select patients resulted in fracture healing and retention of the partial knee replacement. All patients were successfully treated with low complication rates, excellent range of motion, and acceptable knee scores at final follow-up.

 
  • References

  • 1 Foran JRH, Brown NM, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Galante JO. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 102-108
  • 2 van der List JP, McDonald LS, Pearle AD. Systematic review of medial versus lateral survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 2015; 22 (06) 454-460
  • 3 Siman H, Kamath AF, Carrillo N, Harmsen WS, Pagnano MW, Sierra RJ. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 years: comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 1792-1797
  • 4 Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K. , et al. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (8, Suppl): 86-90
  • 5 Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR, Campbell DG. Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19 (02) 112-116
  • 6 Hopper GP, Leach WJ. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (10) 973-979
  • 7 Von Keudell A, Sodha S, Collins J, Minas T, Fitz W, Gomoll AH. Patient satisfaction after primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an age-dependent analysis. Knee 2014; 21 (01) 180-184
  • 8 van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (05) 1016-1021
  • 9 Ji JH, Park SE, Song IS, Kang H, Ha JY, Jeong JJ. Complications of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2014; 6 (04) 365-372
  • 10 Van Loon P, de Munnynck B, Bellemans J. Periprosthetic fracture of the tibial plateau after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2006; 72 (03) 369-374
  • 11 Woo YL, Chin PL, Lo NN, Chia S-L, Tay DKJ, Yeo SJ. Management of periprosthetic fracture in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: a case series. Proc Singapore Healthc 2013; 22: 267-272
  • 12 Kumar A, Chambers I, Wong P. Periprosthetic fracture of the proximal tibia after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (04) 615-618
  • 13 Kim KT, Lee S, Cho KH, Kim KS. Fracture of the medial femoral condyle after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (07) 1143.e21-1143.e24
  • 14 Seeger JB, Jaeger S, Röhner E, Dierkes H, Wassilew G, Clarius M. Treatment of periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: plates versus cannulated screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (02) 253-257
  • 15 Scott RD. Unicondylar arthroplasty: redefining itself. Orthopedics 2003; 26 (09) 951-952
  • 16 Seeger JB, Haas D, Jäger S, Röhner E, Tohtz S, Clarius M. Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (06) 1087-1091
  • 17 Sloper PJH, Hing CB, Donell ST, Glasgow MMS. Intra-operative tibial plateau fracture during unicompartmental knee replacement: a case report. Knee 2003; 10 (04) 367-369