The Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Open and Closed Reduction for Patellar Fractures

Abstract

Patellar fractures account for approximately 1% of all human body fractures. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of open reduction and closed reduction for patellar fractures. This retrospective study included 62 patients (63 cases) who underwent surgical treatment of patellar fractures from 2008 to 2013. Of the 63 cases, open and closed reductions were performed in 42 and 21 cases, respectively. Plain radiography was used to assess fracture healing. Comminuted patellar fracture was the most common fracture type in both groups. Tension band wiring and cannulated screw fixation were mainly used in the open and closed reduction groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the modified hospital for special surgery score, visual analog scale score for pain, and range of motion between the two groups. The mean union time was 3.2 and 3.0 months in open and closed reductions, respectively. Postoperative knee stiffness was noted in five cases of open reduction and in three cases of closed reduction. One patient in the open reduction group had a refracture. There were no notable differences in treatment outcomes between open and closed reductions. Thus, closed reduction may not be inferior to open reduction as a surgical treatment for patellar fractures.

Keywords

patellar fractures - classification - surgical outcome - open reduction - closed reduction

• References

• 1 Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Transverse fractures of the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; (158) 180-184
• 2 Harris RM. Fractures of the patella and injuries to the extensor mechanism. In: Robert W. Bucholz, James D. Heckman, Charles M. Court-Brown, eds. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, 6th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 2269-2302
• 3 Eggink KM, Jaarsma RL. Mid-term (2-8 years) follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation of patella fractures: does the surgical technique influence the outcome?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (03) 399-404
• 4 Gosal HS, Singh P, Field RE. Clinical experience of patellar fracture fixation using metal wire or non-absorbable polyester--a study of 37 cases. Injury 2001; 32 (02) 129-135
• 5 Catalano JB, Iannacone WM, Marczyk S. , et al. Open fractures of the patella: long-term functional outcome. J Trauma 1995; 39 (03) 439-444
• 6 Cho JH. Percutaneous cannulated screws with tension band wiring technique in patella fractures. Knee Surg Relat Res 2013; 25: 215-219
• 7 Hung LK, Chan KM, Chow YN, Leung PC. Fractured patella: operative treatment using the tension band principle. Injury 1985; 16 (05) 343-347
• 8 Nummi J. Fracture of the patella. A clinical study of 707 patellar fractures. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn Suppl 1971; 179: 1-85
• 9 Eric EJ. Fraturas do joelho. In: Rockwood CAJ, Green DP, Bucholz RW. , eds. Fraturas em adultos. 3^rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991: 1729-1744
• 10 Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willeneger H. Manual of internal fixation: Techniques recommended by the AO Group. Springer; 1979: 248-253
• 11 Maeno S, Hashimoto D, Otani T, Masumoto K, Fujita N, Saito S. A novel surgical technique for patellar fracture: application of extra-articular arthroscopy with hanger-lifting procedure. Arthrosc Tech 2003; 3: 275-279
• 12 Bryant TL, Anderson CL, Stevens CG, Conrad BP, Vincent HK, Sadasivan KK. Comparison of cannulated screws with FiberWire or stainless steel wire for patella fracture fixation: A pilot study. J Orthop 2014; 12 (02) 92-96
• 13 Lin T, Liu J, Xiao B, Fu D, Yang S. Comparison of the outcomes of cannulated screws vs. modified tension band wiring fixation techniques in the management of mildly displaced patellar fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 282-292