Keywords
facial fat grafting - fat transfer - fat graft - facial fillers - injectable fillers
Facial fat grafting has become a vital component to the armamentarium of many facial
plastic surgeons who strive to offer a complete and balanced rejuvenation of the face
and neck. Historically, rejuvenative facial work centered entirely on excessive tissue,
gravity, and rhytids, with volume loss only being appreciated in the past two decades.
However, with the advent of surgical fat grafting and nonsurgical injectable fillers,
there has been a rising tide of overfilled faces that have made physicians increasingly
wary of volume restoration as a viable method. In addition, many earlier attempts
of periorbital fat grafting led to unsightly and difficult-to-correct contour problems
that dissuaded many surgeons from performing this procedure. Today, for many facial
plastic surgeons, fat grafting represents the surgical method for volume restoration
that should be complemented as needed by other techniques such as blepharoplasty,
rhytidectomy, and skin resurfacing, depending on the particular nuances of an individual's
aging.[1]
[2]
[3]
Along the themes of this issue, many patients who might benefit from lifting or excisional
procedures simply will never entertain those options due to fear of undergoing the
knife or the belief that noncutting options would be sufficient to make them happy.
It is vital that fat grafting and fillers should not be communicated as a method to
lift tissues by virtue of filling because it falls far short to accomplish that goal.
Patients could be both overfilled and underwhelmed when volume is used to accomplish
antigravitational objectives. Nevertheless, volume loss arises far earlier than gravitational
issues in the majority of patients, and volume restoration can be beneficial for a
wider gamut of ages.
This article will strive to cover the subject of facial fat grafting from a surgeon's
frame of thinking: preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations. In preoperative
considerations, the focus will be on selecting an appropriate candidate and communicating
effectively with the prospective patient the pros, cons, and limitations of fat grafting.
In operative considerations, the objective will be to detail in a stepwise fashion
how to harvest, process, and inject fat grafting in a safe and reproducible manner.
Finally, in postoperative considerations, the discussion will be undertaken on how
to manage the standard postoperative course and how to intervene properly when complications
arise.
Preoperative Considerations
Preoperative Considerations
It may be wise to begin with who would not be a suitable candidate and why. The greatest
risk for an individual seeking fat grafting is postoperative weight gain.[4] The reason for this risk is that transplanted fat is not a bioinert substance but
truly a live graft. Also, the fat that is taken from donor areas recalcitrant to fat
loss, for example, the thighs and abdomen, also exhibit the risk of hypertrophy with
weight gain. There is a contention that transplanted fat is replaced with mainly collagen/scar
tissue, but this assessment is inaccurate. There is a tendency of the face to look
overfilled and distorted if postoperative weight gain occurs. With subsequent weight
loss, individuals return to an appropriate countenance. The question naturally is
how much weight gain would be deemed safe and acceptable. As a general rule, percentage
of body weight rather than absolute weight change should serve as a guide. For example,
someone who weighs approximately 100 pounds may look overinflated if he/she gains
only 10 pounds, whereas someone 150 pounds or more may do fine with a 10-pound weight
gain or even more. The surgeon should take a thorough history as to the person's prior
weight fluctuations. If the person is trying to lose weight, it is usually preferable
to perform the fat transfer about a third of the way into the desired weight loss
since many individuals struggle and oftentimes fail to maintain the lower weight profile.
Conversely, someone who lacks sufficient donor fat who wants to gain weight for the
procedure with the objective to lose the weight postoperatively would not be a good
candidate.
Besides a thorough investigation into a patient's weight history, it is important
to determine the relative risk of a person's age. If someone is below 40 years of
age, fat grafting may not be the ideal choice for facial volumization for a few reasons.
First, a younger patient has not experienced metabolic slowdown that could lead to
weight gain later in life and thereby imperil the result, as stated previously. Second,
many younger patients only exhibit minimal volume loss and might fare better with
nonsurgical, office-based fillers. Usually, someone in their thirties who might be
a good candidate for fat transfer has been very steady in weight throughout life,
has a family history of relatively thinner parental lineage, and exhibits significant
volume loss due to premature aging usually caused by excessive sun exposure.
It is important to know that fat grafting undergoes some resorption, the percentage
of which is very hard to quantify and is variable in degree. Accordingly, if someone
has a small area to be corrected with fat grafting, the concern would be that he/she
will be displeased when the transplanted fat partly recedes. Prospective patients
should be counseled that fat grafting may be worthwhile if there is more significant
global fat loss so that even though there will be partial resorption of transplanted
fat, the global improvement will still justify the value of having undergone a fat-transfer
procedure. Second, there is a cost associated with undergoing anesthesia along with
the need for a more substantive recovery period with fat grafting compared with office-based
fillers. Therefore, if someone has more limited fat loss, then he/she should be encouraged
to consider having facial fillers instead for all of the reasons outlined previously.
The natural challenge that has been raised by patients is that fat is permanent and
fillers are temporary, and therefore the patient still prefers fat grafting even if
it is a smaller, more limited procedure. It has been observed with hyaluronic acid
based fillers that there is an ongoing improvement in results with a few repeated
sessions where fillers can last over time to a comparable extent as transplanted fat.
There are several exceptions to the aforementioned rule where more limited fat grafting
may be indicated. First, if someone has a significant steatoblepharon where fillers
would not easily cover the protuberant lower eyelid fat pocket, then a simultaneous
transconjunctival blepharoplasty along with periorbital fat transfer is the preferred
method to correct this aesthetic problem. Second, if someone is undergoing other surgical
procedures such as a chin augmentation or rhytidectomy, then fat grafting is a very
reasonable small addition to the larger procedure. Third, in rare individuals who
have had serious repeated infectious issues with fillers, then fat grafting is the
only reasonable volume solution for their issues.
Besides some of the inherent risks of fat grafting, it is worth stating when fat grafting
may be of limited benefit. Transplanted fat should be placed relatively deeply into
the subcutaneous plane (or deeper around the eyes, as will be discussed), and fat
is also very soft and pliable as a material. Accordingly, fat is not a good substance
to correct nasolabial grooves, to fix acne scars, or to lift superficial cutaneous
defects. Furthermore, the postoperative edema following fat grafting in lips can be
deforming and protracted with a high resorption rate. Furthermore, as mentioned previously,
fat may exhibit the risk of hypertrophy postoperatively due to weight gain. Therefore,
it may not be advisable to use fat as a reconstructive tool to fill in asymmetric
facial defects, especially in the younger patient and/or in the patient with a highly
unstable weight history.[5] Where fat fails, hyaluronic acid fillers may be used to achieve the desired ends
and, as stated, oftentimes can be quite durable after repeated sessions. In fact,
it is important for patients who are electing to undergo fat grafting to know that
they would most likely benefit from filler treatments toward the end of the first
postoperative year for two reasons. First, there will be some absorption of the fat.
Second, in the future, the patient will experience further aging even on a yearly
basis that would be better treated with office-based fillers. Multiple fat graft sessions
are not recommended because additional fat grafting sessions may lead to one of two
outcomes: an overfilled face or a desire for still additional fat grafting procedures
because there would be once again partial absorption.
For patients who are uncertain whether to pursue fat grafting or fillers, it may be
advisable that if they do not undergo fat grafting after a year or so, then they should
probably just opt for facial fillers to start looking better sooner. If they say that
they want to try fillers first, it is considered less ideal to start with fillers
because the patient must have their fillers they paid for dissolved before he/she
undergoes fat grafting or wait quite for some time to undergo a fat transfer. As stated,
fillers can last months to years, and if a fat transfer is undertaken a few months
after fillers, then the fat may appear to dissipate more rapidly because, in fact,
the fillers are the part actually fading. Accordingly, fat grafting followed by fillers
months to a year later may be preferable, but it is not the other way around. For
people who have had a lot of fillers, it could be argued that they simply do not need
a fat transfer because they already look exceptional. In short, fillers and fat can
achieve comparable results in the right hands. To help patients decide better between
the two options, a chart ([Table 1]) that is on the touchscreen consultation program in the author's office and also
under both the fat grafting and fillers sections of his web site is used as a simple
graphic.
Table 1
From my web site: comparison chart between fat grafting versus fillers
|
Fat grafting
|
Fillers
|
|
Type of procedure
|
Surgical (but no incisions)
|
Office-based
|
|
Ideal age
|
Over 35 y old (with enough facial volume loss to justify the procedure, relatively
stable weight, and healthy to tolerate anesthesia)
|
Any age
|
|
Short-term (initial) cost
|
Higher
|
Lower
|
|
Long-term cost
|
Lower
|
Higher
|
|
Recovery
|
7–10 d: you will not look socially acceptable during the first week but typically
have very little discomfort during that time. You should take at least a week off
from work.
|
Typically, mild swelling for a day or so, but if there is bruising, it could last
in rare cases over a week to two. Ideally, you should give 2 wk before major events,
a week before minor events, but many return to work the same day or the next day if
they are willing to accept some mild swelling and possibly some minor bruising.
|
|
Benefits
|
1. Can provide the most cost-effective solution for an individual with moderate-to-significant
volume loss
2. Permanent solution minus some initial resorption and also further aging
3. Can provide improvement in the quality of skin over time (‘stem cell’ effect)
|
1. Can be tailored to one's budget (small, moderate, or more)
2. Typically, very little recovery
3. Can be effective to treat areas in which fat does not fix well, such as lips and
folds
4. Office-based without the need for anesthesia
5. Not weight-dependent
6. Can last many years after a few rounds
7. Reversible, dissolvable
|
|
Limitations
|
1. More recovery time than fillers (see above)
2. Some initial resorption of fat
3. Does not effectively manage smile lines or lips
4. Fat is dependent on weight, with too much weight loss the fat can look partially
resorbed, or worse with weight gain the face can look too full
|
1. Can be costlier over time when trying to simulate a fat transfer
2. Can take multiple rounds of fillers to achieve longevity, and therefore multiple
smaller rounds of recovery can exceed the one larger recovery time of fat transfer
3. Very low risk (but still possible) of infection since it is not one's own tissue
|
Note: There are two principal ways to restore facial volume: fat grafting and facial
fillers. This is oftentimes a confusing decision for many patients. The table lists
the pros and cons of each method based on Dr. Lam's experience. Even though this table
outlines some of the basic pros and cons of each method, only a consultation with
Dr. Lam can help establish with you which method would be better in your case.
There has also been an increased interest in so-called nanofat injections, which involves
highly emulsified fat, used to improve skin texture, scars, and other cutaneous issues.[6] The author does not have any clinical experience using nanofat and defers this expertise
to his colleagues who perform this procedure. He has observed that after many years
doing fat transfer, there is a finer texture to the skin under areas in which fat
has been transplanted. However, it would be advisable to avoid using hyperbolic marketing
terms that emphasize stem cell rejuvenation of transplanted fat.
Operative Considerations
Anesthesia
Although fat grafting can be accomplished with the patient fully awake, it may be
advisable to perform the procedure with the patient either sedated or under general
anesthesia for improved patient comfort. The deeper the sedation, the less anesthetic
infiltration is required, and therefore, there can be less ecchymosis related to significant
tissue infiltration with local anesthesia. The anesthetic mixture outlined for donor
and recipient sites is tailored for some level of patient sedation, whether intravenous
or general. With the patient under adequate anesthesia, the physician prepares the
donor and recipient sites with povidone–iodine solution. The areas are then sterilely
draped.
Then, a mixture of 5 mL of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine together with 15
mL of plain saline is all that is necessary. Half of the 20-mL mixture is placed with
a long spinal needle (22 gauge, 5″) deeper to the fat plane, and the other half of
the anesthetic is distributed more superficially into the immediate subcutaneous plane.
For example, if the lower abdomen is harvested, a total of 20 mL is used for anesthesia
in that area, whereas each inner thigh would require 20 mL per side. If the anterior
and lateral thighs are intended for harvesting, then an additional 20 mL may be used
per side as needed. In general, the maximum dose of lidocaine can be safely exceeded
with fat harvesting, as the fat cells absorb most of the lidocaine. By using nontumescent
techniques for fat harvesting, fat cell integrity is possibly less compromised, which,
in turn, may lead to more predictable, long-term outcomes.
The face is anesthetized with a regional anesthetic block to minimize discomfort so
that the direct infiltration of local anesthesia of standard 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000
epinephrine can be undertaken without much pain. The entry sites for the face are
then infiltrated with the same 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Additional
anesthetic can be distributed with the same infiltration cannula as used for facial
fat injection, as needed, to supplement the initial local anesthesia when the patient
can tolerate this injection.
Harvesting
Harvesting of fat is undertaken by hand rather than by wall suction. Many alternative
methods for fat harvesting exist and have worked well for their respective surgeons.
The entry site is made with a no.16 Nokor needle at a discreet location, for example,
the lower aspect of the umbilicus for the lower abdomen and along the inguinal line
for thigh harvesting. A bullet-tipped harvesting cannula (Tulip Medical Inc.) is used
to harvest the fat from the donor area in question. The cannula is outfitted on a
10-mL Luer-Lok syringe, and a “Johnnie Lok” device (Tulip Medical Inc.) can be used
to help hold negative pressure during harvesting so as to alleviate finger strain.
Some basic pearls and pitfalls for proper fat harvesting should be outlined herein
to understand safety guidelines that may not be understood by the surgeon unaccustomed
to body lipoharvesting or liposuction. It is important that the surgeon's nondominant
hand not be used to tent up the skin during harvesting, which, in turn, can lead to
contour irregularities. Instead, the nondominant hand can be used with the palm flat
on the skin in the area to be harvested to stabilize the fat pad during cannula movement,
but that should be the extent of it. More specifically, during harvesting, a novice
surgeon tends forcibly to ram the cannula back and forth with the tip of the cannula
abutting fascia in the deep plane or skin in the superficial plane that, in turn,
will minimize functional fat yield and worsen patient discomfort. Accordingly, the
surgeon should be attentive to remain within the center of the fat plane, allowing
the cannula to pass across the entire expanse of the area to be harvested but not
short or beyond it.
Processing
Like harvesting, processing techniques vary between physicians who practice fat transfer
([Fig. 1]). Unfortunately, each physician is dogmatic about his/her method as the only truly
correct way of processing fat. However, straining, centrifugation, washing, and so
on have all worked for the physicians who are seasoned in this discipline. The reader
is encouraged to learn the method that works by one physician who has extensive experience
and not to experiment too much beyond what has been deemed successful given the questionable
nature of longevity by many inexperienced physicians who attempt facial fat grafting.
Fig. 1 This figure shows the layout on the sterile surgical table (clockwise from top left):
the metallic tray (sleeves for centrifugation, towel clamps, and accessory cannulas),
metal bowl into which supranatant/infratant may be discarded, 4 × 4 cotton gauze,
surgical gown, test-tube rack to be used to place the 10-mL syringes of fat (both
pre- and postcentrifugation), 25-mL transfer syringes with one outfitted with a female-to-female
transfer adapter, 1.2- and 0.9-mm injection cannulas (bottom left corner), 10-mL syringes
with harvesting cannula and Johnnie Lock attached, and the metal caps for centrifugation
(center). (Reproduced with permission from Samuel M. Lam, 2019.)
After the fat is collected, the cannula is removed and replaced with a Luer-Lok plug,
and the plunger is removed and replaced with a tight-fitting cap, all of which is
undertaken sterilely. Syringes prepared in this way are placed into sterile sleeves
in a centrifuge and spun for approximately 3 minutes at 3,000 rpm ([Fig. 2]). Of course, it is important to ensure that a balanced orientation of syringes is
distributed in the centrifuge device. Following centrifugation, the syringes are then
sterilely removed. First, the supranatant is poured off of the plunger side, and then
the infranatant is drained off from the Luer-Lok side. A sterile test-tube rack is
an easy method to keep all of the syringes neatly arranged during this phase of the
procedure. Typically, 3 processed 10-mL syringes of collected fat are then placed
into a 20-mL syringe by pouring the contents from the open plunger side to open plunger
side. The plunger is then inserted into the back of the 20-mL syringe taking care
not to eject the fat into the air by tilting the Luer-Lok side of the 20-mL syringe
upward and sliding the fat back toward the plunger as the plunger is inserted and
the air column is advanced out of the syringe. A female-to-female Luer-Lok transfer
hub is used to transfer the contents from the 20-mL syringe into individual 1-mL Luer-Lok
syringes intended to infiltrate the fat into the face. As the plunger on the 20-mL
syringe is depressed, the plunger on the 1-mL syringe is gently glided backward to
accommodate the transferred fat all the way until the plunger is actually removed
and reinserted back to the 1-mL mark. The infiltration cannula, typically a 1.2-mm-wide,
straight, and blunt cannula (Tulip Medical Inc.) is outfitted onto the 1-mL Luer-Lok
syringe ready for fat injection.
Fig. 2 This photograph shows the 10-mL syringe of fat immediately after centrifugation,
removal of the syringe from the sterile sleeve, and the contents with the separated
supranatant (above) consisting of lysed fat cells, the central column of fat, and
the infranatant (below) consisting of blood and lidocaine. (Reproduced with permission
from Samuel M. Lam, 2019.)
Injection
With the patient's face properly anesthetized and the fat already processed, fat injection
can proceed apace. First, the total fat collected should be measured and quantified
as a plan for whether sufficient fat was harvested to complete the job at hand. A
status report as the surgeon progresses should be made to ensure that the fat is adequately
distributed without running out of transferrable fat. It is typically easier to fill
one structure on one side of the face and then the precisely same structure on the
other side, for example, lower eyelid orbital rim on the left followed by the same
on the right, for four reasons. One, the volumes are immediately recalled so that
the same volume is placed per side. Second, immediate recall is still present of how
the distribution of fat was made in a particular location, for example, placing more
of the 1 mL of fat toward the lateral brow on the left to be matched on the right
side. Third, the facial design can be more readily apparent as the face is slowly
built up section by section. Fourth, the fat is less likely to be inadvertently depleted
if one side is aggressively filled and then the physician does not have an adequate
amount to complete the contralateral side, mandating another harvest for more usable
fat.
All entry points are made with a standard 18-gauge needle. An entry point that has
worked well for me is the midcheek region to approach the inferior orbital rim, the
lateral cheek, the buccal region, and the nasolabial groove. The second entry site
is just lateral to the lateral canthus, which allows access to the upper eyelid/brow,
temple, and cheek. The third entry site just behind the prejowl sulcus permits augmentation
of the prejowl region and the anterior chin.
Inferior Orbital Rim
This is technically the most demanding area to work on, as too much placed too quickly
in the wrong tissue plane can lead to contour problems that are not easy to manage.
From the midcheek entry point, the cannula is guided upward toward the orbital rim.
The nondominant index finger is used to protect the globe and also to guide placement
in the right plane and the right location. The cannula tip should feel like it is
releasing some fibrous adhesions so that the tip resides in the immediate supraperiosteal
plane. Again, no more than hundredth of a milliliter per pass of the cannula should
be used to inject the fat to permit only very small aliquots at any one time. In general,
a total of no more than 3 mL should be placed per side with perhaps another 0.5 mL
targeted specifically in the lateral canthal hollow, which is also more easily approached
from a separate lateral entry site. The nondominant index finger can feel that the
placement of the fat is just running back and forth across the bony orbital rim by
about a millimeter on each side and no farther ([Fig. 3]). Additional 1 mL of fat can be placed into the nasojugal groove or triangular soft
tissue defect just inferior to the medial aspect of the inferior orbital rim.
Fig. 3 This is technically the most demanding area to work on, as too much placed too quickly
in the wrong tissue plane can lead to contour problems that are not easy to manage.
From the midcheek entry point, the cannula is guided upward toward the orbital rim.
The nondominant index finger is used to protect the globe and also to guide placement
in the right plane and the right location. The cannula tip should feel like it is
releasing some fibrous adhesions so that the tip resides in the immediate supraperiosteal
plane. Again, no more than a hundredth of a milliliter per pass of the cannula should
be used to inject the fat to permit only very small aliquots at any one time. In general,
a total of no more than 3 mL should be placed per side with perhaps another 0.5 mL
targeted specifically in the lateral canthal hollow, which is also more easily approached
from a separate lateral entry site. The nondominant index finger can feel that the
placement of the fat is just running back and forth across the bony orbital rim by
about a millimeter on each side and no farther. (Reproduced with permission from Samuel
M. Lam, 2019.)
Superior Orbital Rim and Brow
Rather than looking strictly at dermatochalasis of the upper eyelid, there is oftentimes
a flattening of the brow and at times a visible depression of the skin along the superior
aspect of the orbital rim. This depression tends to be a focus of concern that can
lead to remarkable aesthetic improvement. Approaching the soft tissue loss of the
upper eyelid and infrabrow region, the physician can more rapidly place fat across
this defect from a lateral entry site at the lateral canthus. On average 1 to 2 mL
works well to augment this region effectively. Some particular regions of the upper
eyelid and infrabrow that can be effectively targeted include the medial notching
from either aging or surgical fat removal, known as the A-frame deformity, and/or
more laterally along the brow that could typically be thought of as brow ptosis when
it could be simply brow deflation. The plane of infiltration is along that of least
resistance, typically in the subcutaneous dimension ([Fig. 4]).
Fig. 4 Rather than looking strictly at dermatochalasis of the upper eyelid, there is oftentimes
a flattening of the brow and at times a visible depression of the skin along the superior
aspect of the orbital rim. This depression tends to be a focus of concern that can
lead to remarkable aesthetic improvement. Approaching the soft tissue loss of the
upper eyelid and infrabrow region, the physician can more rapidly place fat across
this defect from a lateral entry site at the lateral canthus. On average, 1 to 2 mL
works well to augment this region effectively. Some particular regions of the upper
eyelid and infrabrow that can be effectively targeted include the medial notching
from either aging or surgical fat removal, known as the A-frame deformity, and/or
more laterally along the brow that could typically be thought of as brow ptosis when
it could be simply brow deflation. The plane of infiltration is along that of least
resistance, typically in the subcutaneous dimension. (Reproduced with permission from
Samuel M. Lam, 2019.)
Temple
The temple is a relatively advanced area to fill and perhaps should be approached
with ongoing sophistication in technique and acquired experience. Just like the hollow
inferior orbital rim, only very small aliquots of a hundredth of a milliliter should
be passed in the subcutaneous plane to avoid a likely contour problem. Using only
1 to 2 mL is adequate in most cases to fill each temple. However, experience will
dictate the quantity that would be safe and effective in a particular surgeon's hands.
Anterior Cheek
The anterior cheek should only be filled in rare cases. Fat retention is simply too
high in this area, as it can lead to an overfilled appearance, and even 1 to 2 mL
may appear too full in many cases.
Lateral Cheek
The lateral cheek is the area in continuity with the anterior cheek but lies more
laterally across the exposed malar bony prominence. The lateral cheek can be approached
easily from the midcheek entry site while aiming the cannula superolaterally. Typically,
1 to 2 mL is adequate to build the lateral cheek dimension ([Fig. 5]).
Fig. 5 This photograph shows the placement of fat into the lateral cheek (superior to where
the cannula resides in the photograph) and the area directly below the zygomatic arch
(where the cannula tip is shown) and contiguous with the lateral cheek fill above.
This outer area of filling extending from over the zygomatic arch inferiorly to the
arch can be a critical area to fill to create a more attractive and youthful facial
shape, the classic oval-shaped face of youth. (Reproduced with permission from Samuel
M. Lam, 2019.)
Buccal Area
In the slightly overweight patient, the buccal area is typically avoided because it
can make the individual appear to be even more corpulent. The buccal area can be easily
approached from the midcheek entry site aiming inferolaterally in a plane of least
resistance in the subcutaneous dimension. Typically, 1 to 4 mL can be used depending
on the degree of hollowness. However, the central buccal area can also contribute
to an overfilled appearance when the patient smiles therefore; it is recommended to
inject the fat far more laterally under the zygomatic arch to be blended upward with
the zygomatic prominence ([Fig. 5]).
Prejowl Sulcus
The area immediately anterior to the jowl reflects a bony depression, which, if filled,
can blend the appearance of the jowl better and make the lower face more youthful.
In the individual with mild jowling, the prejowl fill with fat can be sufficient to
create a less obvious jowl appearance. For the individual with substantial jowling,
the result of a lower rhytidectomy can be enhanced by combining the procedure with
a fat transfer to the prejowl sulcus. Typically, 2 to 4 mL can be used along a plane
of least resistance to fill in this area with rapid, larger boluses of fat on the
order of 1/10th of a milliliter per pass like in the buccal and cheek areas ([Fig. 6]).
Fig. 6 The area immediately anterior to the jowl reflects a bony depression, which, if filled,
can blend the appearance of the jowl better and make the lower face more youthful.
In the individual with mild jowling, the prejowl fill with fat can be sufficient to
create a less obvious jowl appearance. For the individual with substantial jowling,
the result of a lower rhytidectomy can be significantly improved by combining the
procedure with a fat transfer to the prejowl sulcus. The physician should imagine
the prejowl expanse as a confluence of three cylinders that needs filling: one along
the anterior margin of the mandible, a second in the inferior aspect of the mandible
(where the jowl is hanging), and a third as a transition between the two areas. Typically,
2 to 4 mL can be used along a plane of least resistance to fill in this area with
rapid, larger boluses of fat on the order of 1/10th of a milliliter per pass like
in the buccal and cheek areas. (Reproduced with permission from Samuel M. Lam, 2019.)
Postoperative Considerations
Postoperative Considerations
Postoperative Care
Since there are no sutures or bandages used, there is very little afterwork required
in terms of wound care and so on. However, ice in the face can reduce postoperative
edema and thus can reduce excessive valsalva/straining, bending over, or heavy salt
diets. There is truly no prohibitive exercise, but care should be taken to not engage
in overzealous activity that would predispose toward prolonged edema. Patients should
know that their face will look too swollen typically for the first 1 to 2 weeks and
may take as long as 3 to 4 weeks to begin liking the result. As a reminder to the
patient, there is a decline in the aesthetic result that can manifest 2 to 3 months
following the procedure, but that should gradually improve over the first 6 to 18
months postoperatively, as the graft begins to take hold and attain blood supply.
Patients should be evaluated with sequential photographs to show them these changes
and should be patiently reminded about the slow process to attain optimal results.
Management of Complications
Hopefully, this article will serve to provide a basic framework of knowledge to help
the beginning surgeon to circumvent easily avoidable mistakes.[7] Taking care to inject slowly sensitive areas such as the lower eyelid in the prescribed
manner can virtually eliminate risks of contour deformities. Conservative volumes
of fat transfer can lead to safer outcomes, especially if the physician avoids the
temptation for too early a touch-up before the fat grafting result has even begun
to manifest. Choosing patients wisely who do not have significant weight fluctuations
can be one of the most important ways to preclude a problem that can arise with significant
postoperative weight gain following a fat transfer.
Nevertheless, complications can and do occur despite the work of the most technically
gifted and precise surgeon. A firm, fibrotic mass that at times can be palpable in
the lower eyelid region is because of the placement of the fat in the wrong plane
and can typically be corrected with injectable 5-fluorouracil or with diluted triamcinolone
acetonide. For a visible, rounder lump, the lump should just be excised along a discreet
line, for example, the tear trough. If the patient is overfilled, it is very difficult
to microliposuction the face of all the excessive fat, but some improvement can be
attained. Therefore, it is very important to be conservative and add more fat, which
is easy, as needed in the future.
Conclusion
Fat grafting can be a safe and wonderful intervention for the aging face whether by
itself or as a complement to traditional lifting procedures ([Figs. 7], [8]). Understanding the way the face ages through volume loss is a prerequisite to begin
one's journey toward performing fat transfer for facial rejuvenation. The obsolete
idea that fat transfer is dangerous or futile has been replaced with the current protocol
that can lead to safety and longevity when the surgeon exercises proper technique,
caution, and artistic judgment over time.
Fig. 7 This 53-year-old woman underwent full-facial fat grafting, rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy,
full-facial erbium laser resurfacing, and botulinum toxin treatments to achieve a
global rejuvenation. (Reproduced with permission from Samuel M. Lam, 2019.)
Fig. 8 (A) This 55-year-old woman underwent full-facial fat grafting and is shown before and
after with notable softening and rejuvenation of her facial features. (B) She is shown that even while smiling, the cheeks do not look overinflated because
no fat was placed into the central and anterior cheek to avoid this type of complication.
(Reproduced with permission from Samuel M. Lam, 2019.)
