Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020; 33(02): 102-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400313
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Computed Tomographic Assessment of Block Recession Trochleoplasty and Partial Parasagittal Patellectomy in Cats

Valentina Brioschi
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Lynda Rutherford
2   The Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, London University, Hatfield, United Kingdom
,
Karin Newell
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Caroline Trotter
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Gareth I. Arthurs
1   Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
3   Arthurs Orthopaedics, Hardwick, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Funding This project was funded by a BVOA clinical research grant.
Further Information

Publication History

17 April 2019

01 October 2019

Publication Date:
24 January 2020 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess computed tomography (CT) images of cadaveric feline stifles and record the relationship between the patella and femoral trochlea in normal stifles; then to investigate the effect of block recession trochleoplasty (BRT) with and without partial parasagittal patellectomy (PPP) on patellofemoral contact, depth of patellar recession and size of trochlea and patella.

Materials and Methods The sample population included six cat cadavers (12 stifles). Preoperative CT scans with stifles in three positions: extended (155–165°), neutral (85–95°) and flexed (35–45°). Lateral stifle arthrotomy was followed by BRT. CT scans were taken as above. PPP was performed so the width of the patella was 1 mm narrower than the BRT. CT scans were repeated and CT measurements were taken.

Results The area of contact between the patella and femoral trochlea was significantly reduced after BRT and then significantly increased after PPP. The depth of patellar recession was unchanged after BRT, but then was significantly higher after PPP. The patella was wider than the trochlea preoperatively and post-BRT and narrower post-PPP. Reduction in bone volume following PPP (mean: 20%) was 50% the reduction in patella width (mean: 40%).

Conclusion Block recession trochleoplasty did not improve patellar recession and decreased patellofemoral contact area. Following BRT, the patella rides the trochlear ridges and loses contact with the trochlear sulcus. Block recession trochleoplasty alone should not be performed in cats. Instead, BRT should be combined with PPP.

Note

This study was presented as a Clinical research abstract at the ECVS congress, Edinburgh, 2017.


Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.