Practical Ethical Approaches for Common Issues in Pediatric Epilepsy

Abstract

The aim of this commentary is to provide clinicians with the tools needed (or, at least, knowledge of where to find them) to navigate the often-turbulent seas of medical ethics. The cases described and questions asked in this issue are not only relevant to pediatric epilepsy but also typical of quandaries faced frequently by health care professionals (HCPs). By examining these cases and extrapolating the ethical questions raised, the clinician will find that there are several ethical approaches that can be taken and may lead to a variety of ways forward. However, by employing the ideas highlighted in this commentary, it is my hope that HCPs will be able to identify these various points of view, evaluate their options, and act in ways that are ethically justifiable.

Keywords

medical ethics - moral theory - paternalism - autonomy

• References

• 1 Beauchamp T, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009
• 2 Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998
• 3 Ross WD. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1930
• 4 van der Vossen B. Libertarianism. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/libertarianism/ . Accessed June 1, 2020
• 5 Arras J. Theory and Bioethics. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/theory-bioethics/ . Accessed June 1, 2020
• 6 Powers M, Faden R. Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006
• 7 Arras JD. The way we reason now: reflective equilibrium in bioethics. In: Steinbock B. , ed. Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007: 46-71
• 8 Beauchamp T. On eliminating the distinction between applied ethics and ethical theory. Monist 1984; 67 (04) 514-531
• 9 Styron W. Sophie's Choice. New York, NY: Bantam Books; 1980
• 10 McConnell T. Moral Dilemmas. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moral-dilemmas/ . Accessed 1 June 2020
• 11 Lederer SE. Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995
• 12 Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966; 274: 1354-1360
• 13 D'Arcy Hart P. A change in scientific approach: From alternation to randomised allocation in clinical trials in the 1940s. BMJ 1999; 319: 572-573
• 14 Lederer SE, Grodin MA. Historical overview: pediatric experimentation. In: Grodin MA, Glantz LH. , eds. Children as Research Subjects. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1994: 19
• 15 Zuckerman D. The ethics of inclusion and exclusion in clinical trials: race, sex, and age. In: Caplan AL, Fiester A, Ravitsky V. , eds. The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. New York, NY: Springer; 2009: 243-258
• 16 Miller PB, Weijer C. Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 542-547
• 17 Christman J. Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/autonomy-moral/ . Accessed June 1, 2020
• 18 Dworkin G. Paternalism. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/paternalism/ . Accessed June 1, 2020
• 19 Charland LC. Decision-Making Capacity. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/decision-capacity/ . Accessed June 1, 2020
• 20 Roskies A. Neuroethics. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/neuroethics/ . Accessed June 1, 2020