Isolated distal pisiform dislocation: Case Report^[*]

Abstract

Isolated pisiform dislocation is a rare lesion with few cases described in the literature. This type of lesion is typically observed in young males and can be easily overlooked at first assessment. Isolated proximal dislocation is more common due to the action of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle.

We present the case of a 19-year-old male patient with isolated distal pisiform dislocation after wrist trauma. He underwent open reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires with excellent functional outcomes.

Although there is no consensual therapeutic method, closed reduction is a first-line treatment for acute presentations. Pisiform open reduction or excision may be performed alternatively or after a failed closed reduction.

 

MissingLinkText

Keywords

wrist injuries - carpal bones - joint dislocations - pisiform

Introduction

Pisiform dislocation is a rare condition with less than 30 documented cases.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Its location within the tendon of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle accounts for its intrinsic stability, making dislocation unlikely, especially with no other associated injuries. With few cases described in the literature, the ideal therapeutic approach is still unclear.

 

MissingLinkText

Clinical Case

We present the case of a 19-year-old male patient with trauma to the volar face of the left wrist after lifting a heavy object (furniture). The continuous compression inflicted by the weight of the object on the extended wrist resulted in sudden onset of pain and slight functional wrist disability. Upon admission to the emergency department, the patient presented pain and swelling on the left ulnar edge of the wrist and hand. He reported slight limitation of wrist flexion and showed no signs of neurological impairment.

The radiography revealed a distal pisiform dislocation at the level of the hook of hamate ([Figure 1]). A computed tomography scan did not show any other concomitant injuries ([Figure 2]). A closed reduction attempt was unsuccessful. Thus, the patient had his wrist immobilized with a posterior plaster cast from the forearm to the palm of the hand and was referred to surgical intervention.

Fig. 1 Initial radiograph demonstrating a distal pisiform dislocation.

Fig. 2 Computed tomography scan (with three-dimensional reconstruction) showing pisiform dislocation and no other concomitant lesions.

An open reduction of the pisiform was performed, followed by fixation to the triquetral bone with two Kirschner wires under radioscopic control ([Figure 3]). The joint capsule was disrupted but the FCU remained intact. The patient's wrist was immobilized with a posterior plaster cast from the forearm to the palm of the hand in flexion and ulnar deviation.

Fig. 3 Immediate postoperative radiograph demonstrating the anatomical reduction of the pisiform and its fixation to the triquetral bone with Kirschner wires.

Five weeks after the surgery, the Kirschner wires and the plaster cast were removed, and motor rehabilitation was started. At 12 weeks postoperatively, a follow-up radiography showed the pisiform in its native position ([Figure 4]). At 12 months postoperatively, the patient recovered the wrist's complete range of motion, presenting symmetrical muscle strength and no residual pain ([Figure 5]). In addition, the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores were equal to 0.

Fig. 4 (A) Radiograph of the left wrist at 12 weeks postoperatively, revealing the sustained pisiform reduction; (B) Radiograph of the right wrist.

Fig. 5 Photograph of the patient demonstrating a symmetrical range of motion.

 

MissingLinkText

Discussion

Isolated pisiform dislocation is an extremely rare lesion, with a small number of cases described in the literature. This type of injury is easily overlooked, especially when concomitant lesions are present. Thus, a high degree of suspicion is required to identify it in patients with upper limb trauma.

Located on the ulnar edge of the proximal carpal row, the pisiform bone articulates with the triquetral bone through its dorsal face. Due to its flat joint facet, the pisiform depends on the surrounding soft tissues to sustain its stability, such as the pisohamate and pisometacarpal ligaments, FCU tendons, and abductor digiti minimi muscle. The pisiform acts as a sesamoid bone, working as a lever to increase the flexion force of the wrist produced by the FCU.[1] [8] [9]

Two mechanisms are proposed to explain pisiform dislocation: direct external trauma or excessive traction force exerted by the FCU.[2] [3] [4] This last mechanism seems to be the most frequent, either due to a fall with trauma of the wrist in extension, or a sudden, violent FCU muscle contraction.

The FCU, as the main wrist flexor muscle, tends to displace the pisiform proximally. Thus, pisiform proximal dislocation is the most frequent type observed, due to the overlap of forces from the FCU and other stabilizing structures.[5]

In our case, the specific traumatic mechanism may explain the pathophysiology of the pisiform dislocation in a distal direction. We hypothesized that the progressive tangential force exerted by the heavy object on the wrist resulted in the distal migration of the pisiform due to capsular disruption and FCU tendon stretching. The hook of the hamate can act as a blocking factor to reduce the pisiform to its anatomical position. The force exerted by the abductor digiti minimi muscle may represent another factor for pisiform migration to the distal carpal row.

The preferred treatment is still unclear, but an attempted closed reduction in acute trauma may be the first therapeutic option. If the closed reduction is unsuccessful, open reduction and internal fixation or excision of the pisiform must be performed. In cases of non-immediate treatment or diagnostic delay, anatomical reduction may become difficult, and pisiform excision results in more predictable outcomes.[3] [6]

In our case, we opted for open reduction and pisiform fixation in its anatomical position due to the potential full recovery of FCU function. The immobilization in flexion and ulnar deviation reduces tension over the FCU, enhancing the healing of this and the remaining juxta-articular structures.[8] We believe that this technique is a reliable method with good functional outcomes in isolated pisiform dislocation.

 

MissingLinkText

 

MissingLinkText

Conflito de Interesses

Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses.

O estudo foi realizado em conformidade com a Declaração da Associação Médica Mundial de Helsinque sobre Princípios Éticos para Pesquisa Médica Envolvendo Seres Humanos.

^* Study developed at Surgical Specialties Department, Orthopedics Functional Unit, Hospital de Cascais – Dr. José de Almeida, Alcabideche, Portugal.

• Referências

• 1 Kwon OS, Choi SP, Won HY. Acute isolated pisiform dislocation: A case report. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2007; 42 (05) 688-691
• 2 Minami M, Yamazaki J, Ishii S. Isolated dislocation of the pisiform: a case report and review of the literature. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9A [phone]
• 3 Schädel-Höpfner M, Junge A, Böhringer G. [Dislocation of the pisiform bone. A review of the literature]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2002; 34 (03) 168-172
• 4 Sharara KH, Farrar M. Isolated dislocation of the pisiform bone. J Hand Surg Br 1993; 18 (02) 195-196
• 5 Campbell E, Magi E. A dislocated pisiform: Case report. Can J Plast Surg 1999; 7 (02) 57-58
• 6 Goriainov V, Bayne G, Warwick DJ. Traumatic dislocation of the pisiform: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2010; 18 (03) 389-390
• 7 Kubiak R, Slongo T, Tschäppeler H. Isolated dislocation of the pisiform: an unusual injury during a cartwheel maneuver. J Trauma 2001; 51 (04) 788-789
• 8 Pevny T, Rayan GM, Egle D. Ligamentous and tendinous support of the pisiform, anatomic and biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (02) 299-304
• 9 Moojen TM, Snel JG, Ritt MJ, Venema HW, den Heeten GJ, Bos KE. Pisiform kinematics in vivo. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (05) 901-907

Publication History

Received: 06 June 2020

Accepted: 17 September 2020

Article published online:
31 March 2021