CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2021; 56(01): 127
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722595
Carta ao Editor
Joelho

Answer to the Letter to the Editor Regarding the Comments on the Article “Radiological Evaluation of the Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction”

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
Luciano Rodrigo Peres
1   Grupo do Joelho, Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
1   Grupo do Joelho, Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Caetano Scalizi Júnior
1   Grupo do Joelho, Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
,
Wolf Akl Filho
1   Grupo do Joelho, Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
› Institutsangaben
 

Dear editor,

First of all, we would like to thank you for your interest in our article. We appreciate your references regarding our study.

The main objective of our study was to evaluate the inclination and length of femoral tunnels and to compare the measurements obtained through computed tomography (CT) and anteroposterior (AP) radiography. Since the femoral tunnel is oblique, there is no supplementary test nor gold standard method to measure its length. Length assessment in an axial CT or CT with three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction seems more reliable. However, as described in our study and reported by the cited authors, the difficulty in comparing different tests is evident, mainly because radiography is subject to a bias regarding knee positioning in addition to the overlap and magnification of anatomical bone landmarks.

The radiological measurements in AP view were based on a line that inferiorly touches the image formed by the overlap of the entire femoral condyle, not considering femoral rotation. Since the femoral tunnel is oblique, a CT standard axial section does not consider a more proximal position of the anatomical curvature of the condyle. Therefore, any comparison is unfeasible, since these reference lines may not be parallel.

Therefore, we decided to measure the inclination and length of the femoral tunnel at the same tomographic position, considering the lower portion of the femoral condyles. A perfect comparison between tests would require the knowledge of the real anatomical inclination and length of the femoral tunnel, either in a cadaveric evaluation or using an anatomical model made with a 3D printer.


#

Conflito de Interesses

Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses.

  • Referências

  • 1 Hensler D, Working ZM, Illingworth KD, Tashman S, Fu FH. Correlation between femoral tunnel length and tunnel position in ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (22) 2029-2034

Endereço para correspondência

Matheus Silva Teixeira
Rua Silveira Peixoto 380, apto. 601, Água Verde, Curitiba, PR, 80240-120
Brasil   

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 16. September 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Februar 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

  • Referências

  • 1 Hensler D, Working ZM, Illingworth KD, Tashman S, Fu FH. Correlation between femoral tunnel length and tunnel position in ACL reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (22) 2029-2034