Keywords
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome - Tourette disorder - tonic tics - dystonic tics -
simple tics - complex tics
Introduction
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a complex neuropsychiatric condition. The
most significant symptoms of the disease are multiple motor and vocal tics. The disease
begins in childhood and affects children, adolescents, and adults worldwide.[1] The diagnostic criteria according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders-5 include the presence of at least two motor and one vocal tics at some
time during the illness, although not necessarily concurrently, onset before age of
18, the tics may wax and wane in frequency but have persisted for more than 1 year
since first tic onset; tics that are neither substance-induced nor due to a general
medical condition.[2]
Tics are defined as sudden, rapid, recurrent, nonrhythmic motor movements (motor tics),
or vocalizations (vocal tics).[3] Even though this description corresponds well with motor clonic tics, there are
some tics which do not fulfill the above criteria and therefore should be distinguished.
Longer and slower movement is typical for dystonic tics (DTs);[4] blocking tics are a presentation of a rapid cessation of muscle activity and voluntary
action, for example, walking or speech;[5]
[6] cognitive tics are mental acts that have the equivalent among complex vocal tics
such as coprolalia, echolalia, or palilalia and are neither visible nor audible;[7] and finally tonic tics (TTs), which manifest themselves as sustained, isometric
contraction of a muscle group devoid of the movement effect or accompanied by only
slight visible motion. We observed that TTs occur in different parts of the body and
are often associated with features characteristic for typical tics such as premonitory
urges (PU), which are momentarily alleviated by performance of a tic giving the feeling
of relief.[8] We therefore hypothesized that TTs have the same characteristics as classic tics
and they are a part of the tic spectrum.
Blinking and other clonic tics usually start as a presenting symptom of GTS at the
age of 5 to 7 years.[8] As the disease progresses, various types of tics may appear at different times.
The prevalence of different tics may also vary depending on patients' age.[9] We suspected that TTs may appear only in some patients and wanted to assess whether
they are presenting, early or rather late symptom of GTS.
The most commonly used clinician-rated measure of tic severity is the Yale Global
Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), which include the presence of TTs as well.[10]
[11] We hypothesized that TTs add significantly to greater tic severity and overall impairment
caused by tics.
Some psychiatric disorders are more common in patients with GTS, this applies especially
to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder
(OCD).[12] It seems that the more comorbid disorders patients have, the more severe tics they
develop. Freeman et al compared the group of patients with GTS without comorbidity
with patients with at least one additional comorbid diagnosis. They observed that
almost twice as many individuals in the comorbid group had severe tics.[13]
In contrast to typical clonic tics, there are also two types of slow and sustained
tics: tonic and DTs.[5] DTs are defined as sustained muscle contractions frequently causing twisting movements,
or abnormal, short-lasting, and unfixed postures.[4] On EMG typical motor clonic tics last less than 100 ms, while the duration of tonic
and DTs is over 300 ms[14] and according to Jankovic, TTs last even longer than DTs, that is >500 ms.[5] As these “nonrapid” tics share some phenomenology, we hypothesized that the occurrence
of both tics may be correlated.
The aim of this study was (1) to assess the prevalence, age of onset, and body distribution
of TTs; (2) to investigate whether TTs are related to PU and if they are associated
with overall tic severity; (3) to ascertain the associations between TTs and psychiatric
comorbidities; (4) to assess the correlations between TTs and DTs; and (5) to distinguish
between the clinical associations of TTs for patients under the age of 18 years and
adults.
Materials and Methods
Clinical Evaluation
All the patients were recruited from one single outpatient clinic, and were personally
reviewed and evaluated by the same clinician well-experienced in tic disorders (P.J.).
Patients were referred to the clinic by general neurologists and psychiatrists due
to problematic diagnosis or tics refractory to treatment or sought medical advice
on their own because of troublesome tics. The study was designed as a one-time registration
study, as patients were registered in the database only once, and no additional clinical
data obtained in follow-up visits were included in the analysis.
YGTSS was used to assess the severity of tics within the last week before the clinical
evaluation.[10] To assess the lifetime intensity of tics we defined descriptively the term peak
tic severity, which is worst-ever tic severity experienced by the patient and we questioned
it actively. Thus, tics at their most severe were determined retrospectively on the
basis of an interview with the patient. This definition prevented inappropriate classification,
for example, not to classify the disease as mild in adults with mild tics at the time
of evaluation but with a history of severe tics during childhood. Peak tic severity
was qualified as mild, moderate, or severe. Mild tics were defined as not related
to physical or mental discomfort, problems in relations with peers, lower than expected
academic achievements, or the need for treatment. Moderate tics generated only small
and temporary restrictions in patients' daily lives (e.g., a few days' absence from
school, as well as difficulties with homework). Severe tics caused an inability to
continue normal daily activities (e.g., repeating grades, losing one's job or physical
discomfort), a significant deterioration in the quality of life and the necessity
of pharmacological therapy. The total number of simple tics and total number of complex
tics were counted for each patient based on a tic symptom checklist included in YGTSS.
We collected information about the presence of PU and a feeling of relief following
a tic.
The patients were evaluated for the clinical diagnosis of GTS according to the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria valid at the time of evaluation
(DSM-IV-TR, DSM-5). All patients were systematically interviewed with the aid of semi-structured
interview comprised of demographic and clinical data, which was gathered for all the
patients. This schedule is based on the Tourette syndrome International database Consortium
Data Entry Form, developed by Freeman et al,[13] in which study the investigator (P.J.) participated and subsequently used this form
in clinical practice. This interview was slightly modified over time and expanded
with the questions on different types of tics including TTs (each symptom was scored
as either present or absent). The prevalence of the most common comorbid disorders
encountered in GTS was evaluated on the basis of the same, mentioned above, and semi-structured
clinical interview. Disorders that were listed in this semi-structured interview were
ADHD, OCD, obsessive compulsive behavior (OCB), depression, anxiety disorder (including
different forms of anxiety disorders, for instance phobias, panic disorder, generalized
anxiety disorder, and separation anxiety disorder), oppositional defiant disorder,
conduct disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. If obsessions and compulsions did
not cause marked distress and did not significantly interfere with the person's normal
functioning, we diagnosed OCB. The list of obsessions and compulsions included in
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) were used to establish clinical spectrum
of OCD/OCB. Each patient was carefully questioned about all the symptoms listed in
the DSM to fulfill the diagnostic criteria of the above-mentioned comorbid disorders.
The diagnoses of mental disorders that had been made in psychiatric clinics, before
our evaluation, were accepted and included into analyses. For the assessment of comorbidities,
no validated rating scales for all adults and most patients under the age 18 were
used. One-third of children and adolescents, with more complex psychopathology, were
assessed with the M.I.N.I. International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and
Adolescents. Patients with severe psychiatric comorbidities were referred to psychiatrist
to confirm the diagnosis. In this case, the psychiatric diagnosis was considered to
be definite, and as such taken into consideration in study analyses.
Collection of clinical data from patients with GTS was approved by the ethics committee
of the Medical University of Warsaw (KB/2/2007).
Study Participants
The cohort of GTS cases comprised 241 consecutive patients aged 5 to 50 years (mean
age: 16.3 ± 9.2; 188 males, 78.0%). The subjects were evaluated from 2013 to 2019.
One hundred and fifty-three children and adolescents (63.5%, mean age: 10.4 ± 3.0)
and 88 adults (mean age: 26.6 ± 7.1) were enrolled. The mean age of tic onset was
6.3 ± 2.7 years. Duration of GTS in children and adolescents ranged 1 to 13 years
(mean: 5.0 ± 2.9 years) and in adults 6 to 39 years (mean: 17.9 ± 7.3 years). One
hundred and ninety-eight patients (82.2%) had, at least, one psychiatric comorbidity,
which includes 75 adults (85.2%) and 123 patients under the age of 18 years (80.4%).
The number of diagnosed mental disorders ranged from 1 to 7, the median was 2 (IQR:
1–3) in all GTS patients, but 3 (IQR: 2–4) in the group of adults, and 2 (IQR: 1–3)
in the group of children and adolescents.
Definition, Differentiation, and Types of Tonic Tics
To avoid misidentification of symptoms, we explained to patients what the different
types of tics are. TTs manifest themselves as isometric muscle contractions that are
associated with no or only slight movement,[5] while DTs consist of slow, twisting movements resembling dystonia.[8] The duration of muscle contraction during TTs and DTs is longer compared with clonic
tics, but unlike DTs, TTs do not lead to any abnormal postures.[14] For example, in the case of abdominal tics, we qualified them as tonic if they were
felt by the patient as tensing of the abdomen or pulling in the stomach, whereas DT
of trunk and abdomen was a twisting movement that lead to an abnormal, usually short-lasting
and noticeable posture. Another feature in which these two types of tics differ is
that DTs are often painful,[15] while TTs mostly are not. However, to distinguish TTs from DTs in some patients
may be challenging, then careful clinical assessment is required. We assessed whether
patients had experienced TTs in the past or were experiencing them at evaluation.
We considered tics to be currently present if they had appeared in the last 7 days,
consistent with the YGTSS. The presence of TTs was determined on the basis of the
interview, occurrence during the examination, or video recording provided by the patient.
We did not use superficial EMG to assess currently occurring tics, which is a limitation
of our study. We also collected information about the anatomical location of these
tics. Patients reported the following types of TTs: tensing of the abdomen, neck,
upper limb, lower limb, buttocks, or the whole body.
Statistical Methods
Continuous numerical variables were described by the use of arithmetic means and standard
deviation (mean ± SD), discrete numerical variables were depicted by the use of medians
and quartiles (Q1, Q3), and categorical (nominal or ordinal) variables were presented as absolute numbers
with frequencies (percentages). The Shapiro–Wilk W test was used to assess the normality
of distributions. Levene's test was performed to assess the homogeneity of variances.
Comparisons for two independent groups, considering the numerical traits, encompassed
one-way analysis of variance without replication or the Mann–Whitney U test. Contingency
tables, depicting and intersecting two categorical variables, were provided with the
Chi-square test of independence with Yate's continuity correction when applicable.
Two-tailed procedures were fitted. A level of p <0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All variables that had been significant
factors within the univariate analyses were entered into logistic regression models
to determine predictors for TTs in the GTS patients. The regression models were controlled
for the studied patients' age and gender. The statistical analyses were performed
using Stata/SE release 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, United States).
In statistical analysis, we included 232 out of 241 examined patients. Nine patients
were excluded as these were young children unable to comprehend questions during the
interview, so it was not possible to assess whether they experienced TTs.
Results
TTs occurred at some point in the lifetime of 167 out of 232 evaluated patients (72%),
including 75 out of 88 adults (85.2%) and 92 out of 144 children and adolescents (63.9%).
TTs had occurred statistically significantly more often in adults than in children
and adolescents (p < 0.001). TTs were present in 127 patients (76%) at the time of evaluation. In 40
patients (24%), they were present only in the past. The age of onset was known in
109 patients (65.3%) and the mean age of onset was 10.4 ± 4.9 years. TTs occurred
on average 4.0 ± 4.1 years after tic onset. Most frequently, the onset of TTs was
in childhood (67% at the age of 3–11 years), less frequent in adolescence (28.4% at
the age of 12–17 years), exceptionally in adulthood (4.6% at the age ≥18 years). In
patients with TTs, their number ranged from 1 to 6. The median was 2 (IQR: 1–3) overall,
but 3 (IQR: 2–4) in the group of adults, and 2 (IQR: 1–3) in the group of patients
under the age of 18 years.
In more than half of the patients, tensing of the abdomen, neck, and upper limbs was
found. Less frequently, patients reported tensing the lower limbs, whole body, and
buttocks ([Fig. 1]).
Fig. 1 Prevalence of tonic tics by their location (n = 167).
Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between TTs and
peak tic severity, YGTSS, total number of simple tics, total number of complex tics,
number of mental disorders, age at the time of evaluation, duration of GTS, DTs, presence
of PU, and feeling of relief after tic. Univariate analysis performed in the group
of children and adolescents showed a statistically significant association between
TTs and total number of simple tics, total number of complex tics, age at the time
of evaluation, and duration of GTS, while in the analysis performed in the group of
adults, the correlation between TTs and peak tic severity, total number of simple
tics, total number of complex tics, DTs, and PU was statistically significant ([Table 1]). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed only significant association
between TTs and age at the time of evaluation, total number of simple tics, and total
number of complex tics. In the multivariate analysis performed in a group of children
and adolescents statistically significant parameters were total number of simple tics,
total number of complex tics, age at the time of evaluation, and duration of GTS,
while in the analysis for the group of adults, the total number of simple tics, total
number of complex tics, peak tic severity, DTs, and PU turned out to be statistically
significant ([Table 2]).
Table 1
Univariate comparisons between patients with tonic tics and patients without tonic
tics
|
Variable
|
All GTS patients (n = 232)
|
Children and adolescents with GTS (n = 145)
|
Adults with GTS (n = 87)
|
|
Patients with TTs (n = 167)
|
Patients without TTs (n = 65)
|
p-Value
|
Patients with TTs (n = 92)
|
Patients without TTs (n = 53)
|
p-Value
|
Patients with TTs (n = 75)
|
Patients without TTs (n = 12)
|
p-Value
|
|
Gender (females), n (%)
|
37 (22.2)
|
13 (20.0)
|
0.720
|
21 (22.8)
|
10 (18.9)
|
0.576
|
16 (21.3)
|
3 (25.0)
|
0.720
|
|
Age (y), mean (SD), min–max
|
18.1 (9.3), 5–50
|
12.6 (7.8), 5–41
|
<0.001
|
11.2 (3.1), 5–17
|
9.4 (2.2), 5–17
|
<0.001
|
26.6 (7.1), 18–50
|
26.9 (7.3), 18–41
|
0.892
|
|
Duration of GTS (y), mean (SD), min–max
|
11.0 (8.1), 1–39
|
5.7 (5.4), 1–26
|
<0.001
|
5.8 (3.0), 1–13
|
3.9 (2.0), 1–12
|
<0.001
|
18.2 (7.4), 6–39
|
16.5 (6.7), 6–26
|
0.483
|
|
YGTSS, mean (SD), min–max
|
48.6 (21.3), 5–96
|
38.5 (21.9), 0–92
|
0.001
|
43.5 (21.0), 5–83
|
36.8 (21.8), 0–86
|
0.069
|
54.9 (20.2), 14–96
|
45.8 (20.8), 17–92
|
0.155
|
|
Peak tic severity (ever), n (%)
Mild
Moderate
Severe
|
21 (12.6)
89 (53.3)
57 (34.1)
|
21 (32.3)
34 (52.3)
10 (15.4)
|
<0.001
|
19 (20.7)
56 (60.9)
17 (18.5)
|
20 (37.7)
25 (47.2)
8 (15.1)
|
0.073
|
2 (2.7)
33 (44.0)
40 (53.3)
|
1 (8.3)
9 (75.0)
2 (16.7)
|
0.015
|
|
Premonitory urges, n (%)
|
105 (65.6)
|
29 (46.7)
|
0.013
|
44 (51.2)
|
23 (46.0)
|
0.561
|
61 (82.4)
|
6 (50.0)
|
0.012
|
|
Relief after tic, n (%)
|
124 (77.5)
|
38 (59.4)
|
0.007
|
58 (67.4)
|
28 (56.0)
|
0.182
|
66 (89.2)
|
9 (75.0)
|
0.179
|
|
Total number of simple tics, median (Q1–Q3), min–max
|
13 (10–17), 2–30
|
10 (7–12), 3–19
|
<0.001
|
13 (11–16), 5–24
|
10 (8–12), 5–19
|
<0.001
|
14 (10–18), 2–30
|
7 (6–12), 3–19
|
0.002
|
|
Total number of complex tics, median (Q1–Q3), min–max
|
8 (4–12), 0–30
|
5 (2–7), 0–15
|
<0.001
|
8 (5–12), 0–26
|
6 (3–8), 0–15
|
0.009
|
7 (4–12), 0–30
|
2 (1–4), 0–13
|
<0.001
|
|
Dystonic tics, n (%)
|
131 (78.4)
|
41 (63.1)
|
0.016
|
71 (77.2)
|
35 (66.0)
|
0.145
|
60 (80.0)
|
6 (50.0)
|
0.024
|
|
Number of mental disorders, median (Q1–Q3), min–max
|
2 (1–3), 0–7
|
1 (1–2), 0–7
|
0.006
|
2 (1–3), 0–7
|
1 (1–3), 0–7
|
0.089
|
2 (1–4), 0–7
|
2 (1–2), 0–6
|
0.119
|
Abbreviations: GTS, Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; max, maximum value; min., minimum
value; n, number; Q1, lower quartile; Q3, upper quartile; SD, standard deviation; TTs, tonic tics; YGTSS, Yale Global Tic
Severity Scale.
Missing data were case-wise deleted.
Table 2
Multivariate logistic regression estimates
|
Variable
|
All GTS patients (n = 232)
|
Children and adolescents with GTS (n = 145)
|
Adults with GTS (n = 87)
|
|
OR
|
95% CI
|
p-Value
|
OR
|
95% CI
|
p-Value
|
OR
|
95% CI
|
p-Value
|
|
Gender (females)
|
1.64
|
0.69–3.91
|
0.264
|
1.27
|
0.55–2.95
|
0.576
|
0.81
|
0.20–3.36
|
0.776
|
|
Age (y)
|
1.06
|
1.02–1.12
|
0.009
|
1.28
|
1.11–1.47
|
<0.001
|
0.99
|
0.91–1.08
|
0.890
|
|
Duration of GTS (y)
|
0.95
|
0.81–1.11
|
0.484
|
1.31
|
1.13–1.51
|
<0.001
|
|
|
|
|
YGTSS
|
0.98
|
0.95–1.02
|
0.336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak tic severity
|
1.86
|
0.78–4.43
|
0.164
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
1.27–11.84
|
0.017
|
|
Premonitory urges
|
1.03
|
0.34–3.16
|
0.954
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
1.30–16.88
|
0.018
|
|
Relief after tic
|
2.08
|
0.93–4.66
|
0.076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of simple tics
|
1.17
|
1.05–1.31
|
0.005
|
1.23
|
1.10–1.38
|
<0.001
|
1.24
|
1.06–1.46
|
0.007
|
|
Total number of complex tics
|
1.11
|
1.02–1.22
|
0.023
|
1.12
|
1.03–1.23
|
0.012
|
1.40
|
1.09–1.79
|
0.008
|
|
Dystonic tics
|
0.82
|
0.34–1.94
|
0.647
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
1.13–14.17
|
0.032
|
|
Number of mental disorders
|
0.80
|
0.60–1.05
|
0.105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GTS, Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; OR, odds
ratio; YGTSS, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale.
Discussion
This publication shows that TTs are a common symptom of GTS. In our study group, TTs
occurred at some point in the lifetime in 7 out of 10 consecutively examined patients.
TTs were reported more often by adult patients, which results probably from longer
disease duration and greater age at patients' evaluation ([Table 1]). Our findings show that the risk of TTs increases with the duration of the disease
but only in childhood and adolescence, which suggests that in most patients TTs will
appear during these periods. This thesis seems to be confirmed by the fact that the
group of nonadult patients with TTs was significantly older than the group of nonadult
patients without such tics ([Tables 1] and [2]). Age at onset of TTs was known in two-third of patients. In nearly 67% of them,
TTs had their onset in childhood, less frequently in adolescence, and onset in adulthood
was found exceptionally. We assume that even in the few patients who reported the
onset of TTs in adulthood, these tics have actually occurred before. Due to recall
bias, many adult patients do not remember the symptoms that occurred in childhood
and they usually come alone for outpatient visits, without parents. Mean age of TTs
onset was just over 10 years, which was on average 4 years after first tic onset.
Thus, TTs seem to be an early symptom of GTS, and although they cannot be considered
as a presenting symptom, they seem to join classic tics after only a few years of
the disease.
Our study shows that TTs may be present as a single phenomenon or may occur as a few
tics in the same patient. In the study group, the number of these tics ranged from
1 to even 6, the median was 2 (IQR: 1–3). Adult patients reported more types of TTs
compared with children and adolescents, which probably results from longer disease
duration or greater awareness of tic symptoms. Tensing the axial muscles (abdomen
and neck) was found most commonly, followed by tensing the limb muscles. TTs occurred
more often within the upper part of the body. Tensing the abdomen was the most frequently
reported tonic tic among our patients ([Fig. 1]). Therefore, the incidence of TTs in different parts of the body differs from that
observed for classic tics. Typically, motor tics located most often in the eyes, face,
and head are a presenting symptom of GTS, followed by the neck and shoulders, later
and less often they affect the arms and hands. Motor tics of the trunk and legs are
the least common.[8]
[16]
Occurrence of PU and a feeling of relief following a tic are another characteristic
features of tics.[1] Univariate analysis showed statistically significantly more frequent occurrence
of PU in the group of patients with TTs compared with the group without these tics
([Table 1]). According to the literature approximately 90% of adults and 37% of children with
GTS report the occurrence of PU.[17]
[18] Thus, it is not surprising that TTs were associated with PU more often in adults
than in children and adolescents ([Tables 1] and [2]). In a study by Leckman et al, 93% from 135 evaluated patients reported experiencing
PU. The mean age at which the patients first became aware of PU was 10.0 ± 6.2 years,
which was on average 3.1 ± 5.7 years after the onset of tics.[19] This corresponds to the characteristics of patients with TTs in our cohort- the
mean age at onset of TTs was 10.4 ± 4.9 years, which was 4.0 ± 4.1 years after first
tic onset. This additionally proves that patients with TTs can potentially experience
and report the occurrence of PU. If clinicians are aware that TTs are often associated
with the occurrence of PU, it could increase in the number of patients who would be
candidates for behavioral therapy because tic-related PU enable to implicate this
first-line treatment. In addition, some patients with GTS perceive tics as voluntary
movements made automatically to reduce the PU.[20] Due to the fact that patients with TTs significantly more often experience PU, they
are more likely to consider these tics as voluntary movements compared with GTS patients
who do not have TTs. Another typical feature of tics is a feeling of relief after
tic, which is related to short-term disappearance of PU. Univariate analysis showed
that relief after tic occurs significantly more often in the group of patients with
TTs compared with the group without these tics ([Table 1]). In about third-fourth of patients TTs were present at the time of evaluation,
and in about one-fourth they occurred only in the past. This proves that TTs have
features characteristic for other tics, such as variability over time, and they can
occur and vanish similar to typical tics. The above paragraph proves that TTs have
many characteristics of classic tics that enables us to include TTs in the tic spectrum.
In the natural course of GTS, tics commonly have their onset at the age of 4 to 6
years, reach their peak severity at the age of 10–12 years, and then their intensity
gradually decreases during adolescence and adulthood.[21] The mean age of onset of TTs in our patients coincides with the period of greatest
severity of tics. This may suggest that this type of tics can add significantly to
the impairment caused by tics. The results of our analysis suggest that TTs occur
in patients with a more severe form of GTS. We proved that TTs correlate with a higher
total number of tics, greater tic severity, and additionally with a greater number
of psychiatric disorders.
We found that at least one psychiatric disorder occurred in 82.2% of our patients.
Univariate analysis showed significantly more psychiatric disorders in the group of
patients with TTs compared with patients without TTs; however, this correlation was
not confirmed neither by multivariate analysis nor by analyses conducted separately
in the groups of patients under the age of 18 years and adults ([Tables 1] and [2]). It is not clear whether the presence of TTs reflects a more severe GTS phenotype
that is associated with more comorbidities, or whether the presence of concomitant
psychiatric disorders increases the risk of TTs.
As TTs and DTs belong to “nonrapid” tics, we suspected that characteristics and clinical
correlates might be similar for both these tics. Actually, the prevalence and mean
age at onset of TTs and DTs were nearly the same (72 and 73.9%, and 10.4 and 9.9 years,
respectively). Additionally, clinical analysis of DTs performed by our team in nearly
the same patient cohort showed similar results compared with those we obtained during
the analysis of TTs.[22] Among variables included in analyses of both DTs and TTs, almost the same parameters
turned out to be statistically significant: severity of tics at the time of evaluation
(YGTSS) and in the past (peak tic severity), number of mental disorders, total number
of simple, and total number of complex tics. Only age was not a statistically significant
parameter in the analysis of DTs, while it was for TTs. In the present study, we showed
that DTs occurred more frequently in patients with TTs, and the positive correlation
between TTs and DTs in adult patients was confirmed by multivariate analysis ([Tables 1] and [2]). Similarities of clinical phenomenology between these two types of tics and their
coexistence in many patients may confirm their affiliation to the “nonrapid” tic spectrum.
Affiliation of TTs to the tic spectrum demonstrated in this publication suggests that
their treatment may be the same as that of classic tics. Although there is a relationship
between TTs and the overall severity of tics, the treatment should only be initiated
in patients for whom tics are bothersome, as in the case of typical clonic tics. Despite
many similarities between TTs and DTs we have described, it seems that the injections
with botulinum toxin, although effective in many patients with DTs,[15] will not find application in patients with TTs. This is due to the fact that TTs
affect large muscle groups, for example, the entire limb or the entire abdomen, so
it is not possible to administer botulinum toxin to all muscles responsible for causing
symptoms.
Conclusion
The diagnosis of GTS is based on the clinical picture. Therefore, clinicians should
carefully search for any tic symptoms and actively ask patients about their occurrence.
We showed that TTs belong to the tic spectrum, are common and early symptoms of GTS,
and should be differentiated from DTs. We also found that patients with TTs have a
greater total number of tics which are more severe, and they have more comorbidities.
