Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(03): 223-227
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-109471
Aktuell diskutiert
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Informationstechnologie in der Reproduktionsmedizin – Europäische IVF-Register – warum Zahlen nicht gleich Zahlen sind

Markus Kupka
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 April 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

„You must look at the facts because they look at you“. Sir Winston Churchill wird dieses Zitat zugesprochen. Er soll es vor 90 Jahren ausgesprochen haben. An der Aktualität hat sich nichts geändert. Ebenfalls aus England stammte der Mediziner Archibald Cochrane, der seit der Veröffentlichung seines Buches „Effectiveness and Efficiency – Random Reflections on Health Services“[1] als Vater der evidenzbasierten Medizin gilt. Nur das Sammeln, Analysieren und Interpretieren großer Datenmengen scheint Aufschluss über Sinnhaftigkeit, Effektivität und Sicherheit medizinischer Behandlungen zu ermöglichen [2], [3]. Dies gilt auch im Bereich der assistierten Reproduktionstechniken (ART) oder allgemeiner: für die Kinderwunschbehandlung [4]–[6].

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. Research report. 1 Jun 1972
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Kupka MS, Felberbaum RE, van der Ven HH et al. Prognosefaktoren der as-sistierten Reproduktion – Analysen auf der Grundlage der Ergebnisse des Deutschen IVF-Registers (DIR). Gynäkologe 2004; 37: 686-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kupka MS, Dorn C, Richter O, Felberbaum R, van der Ven H. Impact of repro-ductive history on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection outcome: Evidence from the German IVF Registry. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 508-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kupka MS, Dorn C, Richter O, van der Ven H, Baur M. Easy and effective – web-based information systems designed and maintained by physicians: ex-perience with two gynecological projects. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003; 268: 184-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kupka MS, Ellinger T, Richter O, van der Ven H, Goldschmidt AJW. IT-unterstütztes Geschäftsprozessmanagement am Beispiel einer universitären reproduktionsmedizinischen Einrichtung. Journal für Fertilität und Reproduktion 2001; 11: 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kupka MS, Dorn C, van der Ven H. Development of Electronic Data Collection as a Tool for Quality Assessment in Reproductive Techniques in Germany. Reprod Technol 2001; 10: 332-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 http://www.eshre.eu/eim
    PubMed
  • 8 Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Re-prod 2001; 16: 384-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nygren KG, Nyboe Andersen A. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1998. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2459-2471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nygren KG, Andersen AN. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1999. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 3260-3274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Nygren KG. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European Registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 490-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG. As-sisted Reproductive Technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from Eu-ropean Registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 1158-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG. As-sisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1680-1697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Gianaroli L et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1513-1525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Ferraretti AP et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 756-771
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauter-ine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2009;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1851-1862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S et al. Assisted reproductive tech-nology in Europe, 2007: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 954-966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Em-bryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2571-2584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S et al. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduc-tion and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 2318-2331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kupka MS, Ferraretti AP, de Mouzon J et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE†. European IVF-Monitoring Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Hum Reprod 2014; 29: 2099-2113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pak SJ, Warlich J, van Rooij TN. RecDate – an IT-solution for the documenta-tion and quality management of reproductive medicine. Zentralbl Gynakol 2001; 123: 482-486
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Fertility_statistics/de
    PubMed
  • 24 http://www.icmartivf.org
    PubMed
  • 25 Sullivan EA, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: as-sisted reproductive technology 2004. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 1375-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nygren KG, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2003. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 2209-2222.e17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren KG et al. World Collaborative Report on Assisted Reproductive Technology 2002. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 2310-2320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Lancaster P et al. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization 2000. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1586-1622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Adamson GD, Lancaster P, de Mouzon J et al. World collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 1998. IFFS, Melbourne, 25–29 November 2001a
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Adamson GD, Lancaster P, de Mouzon J et al. World collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 1998. In: Reproductive Medicine in the 21st Century. London: Parthenon Publishing Group; 2001: 209-219
    Google Scholar
  • 31 de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren K, Zegers-Hochschild F. World report: pre-liminary data for 1996. 16th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, IFFS, San Francisco, USA, 4–9 October 1998
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 de Mouzon J, Lancaster P. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization. Preliminary data for 1995. J Assist Reprod Gen 1997; 14: 251s-265s
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 de Mouzon J, Lancaster P. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 1993. Congress Booklet, Montpellier, 17–22 September 1995, 1–43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cohen J, de Mouzon J, Lancaster P. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 1991. VIIIth Congress on In Vitro and Alternate Assisted Reproduction. Congress Booklet, Kyoto, 12–15 September 1993, 1–38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Adamson GD, Lancaster P, de Mouzon J et al. ICMART World Report on In Vitro Fertilization 2000: How Does the United States Compare?. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: S86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Adamson GD, Zegers-Hochschild F, Nygren KG, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O. ICMART report on global trends in ART from 2000–2004: how does the USA compare?. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: S53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Germond M, Wirthner D, Senn A. et al. Core data for assisted reproductive technology registers: results of a consensus meeting.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17: 834-840
    CrossrefPubMed
  • 39 Kupka MS, Bühler K, Felberbaum R. Nationale und internationale Einrichtungen zur Qualitätssicherung und Qualitätskontrolle in der Reproduktionsmedizin. Der Gynäkologe 2009; 42: 522-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Nygren K, Adamson GD, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J. Cross-border fertility care – International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies global Survey: 2006 data and estimates. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: e4-e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar