Keywords patellofemoral joint - single-photon emission tomography - computed tomography - clinical
outcome - total knee replacement
The optimal approach for patellar management during total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
remains controversial. Consensus about patellar resurfacing exists in patients with
inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid arthritis.[1 ] In contrast, patients with osteoarthritis (OA), preoperative anterior knee pain
is traditionally used as an indication of selective patella resurfacing.[2 ] Additionally, damaged patellar articular cartilage noted during surgery may be used
to direct patellar resurfacing during TKA performed for knee OA.[3 ]
[4 ]
[5 ] However, the decision to perform patellar resurfacing in the presence of patellar
cartilage loss is not uniformly accepted. Some surgeons recommend patellar resurfacing
according to the severity of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella.[4 ]
[5 ]
[6 ] Others reported that there was no difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes
between patients with and without patellar resurfacing regardless of the degree of
patellar cartilage degeneration.[7 ]
[8 ]
[9 ]
[10 ]
Single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) is an imaging modality performed after the
administration of a radioactive tracer.[11 ] Active osteoblasts are the main target of the injected tracer. Bone tracer uptake
(BTU) reflects bone turnover in the subchondral bone plate and bone marrow, which
is influenced by blood flow and mechanical loading on bone.[12 ]
[13 ] Recently, SPECT has been combined with computed tomography (CT) for anatomical accuracy.
This hybrid system (SPECT/CT) is sensitive for detecting subchondral lesions.[12 ]
If the BTU observed on SPECT/CT can reflect subchondral bone involvement and the degree
of cartilage degeneration, it may be required to determine the degree of patellar
OA before surgery. Studies have reported that BTU on SPECT/CT increased along the
size and depth of cartilage lesions.[13 ]
[14 ] Hirschmann et al reported that BTU on SPECT/CT could be detectable before structural
changes were found on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CT, and conventional radiographs.[15 ] These findings suggest that SPECT/CT reflects not only the current state of cartilage
lesion, but also the condition before the obvious cartilage degeneration was found
by using other imaging modalities. In addition, it was revealed that in addition to
the clinical symptoms, the responsibility for treatment is related to BTU in middle-aged
patients with anterior knee pain.[11 ]
[16 ] Therefore, if the SPECT/CT is evaluated prior TKA, it could be useful to predict
the patellofemoral (PF) clinical outcomes and help to decide how to manage the PF
compartment. However, no study has previously reported the relationship between cartilage
degeneration underneath the patella and BTU on SPECT/CT in patients who candidates
for TKA. In addition, no study has reported the clinical outcomes of PF after TKA
according to SPECT/CT findings.
We sought to determine whether SPECT/CT reflected the cartilage lesion underneath
the patella in patients with end-stage OA who underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing.
We also wanted to determine whether the PF and overall outcomes after TKA differed
according to the severity of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella evaluated
by intraoperative gross grading and findings on SPECT/CT. We hypothesized that BTU
would increase according to the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella.
We also hypothesized that SPECT/CT findings, which reflect subchondral involvement
rather than visual cartilage degeneration grading determined at the surface, would
be related to PF and overall clinical outcome after TKA.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Population
This retrospective study included 125 patients (206 knees) who underwent primary TKA
without patellar resurfacing. The inclusion criteria were following (1) TKA due to
OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or 4) with pain unresponsive to conservative treatment,
(2) preoperative SPECT/CT evaluation, and (3) clinical evaluation at preoperative,
postoperative 1 year and 2 years after TKA. In total, 127 patients (208 knees) were
eligible for inclusion among the patients who underwent TKA between 2015 and 2017
in our institute. Among the patients eligible for inclusion, two patients (two knees)
were excluded by the following exclusion criteria (1) inflammatory arthritis such
as rheumatoid arthritis and post-traumatic arthritis, (2) neuromuscular disorders
such as Parkinson's disease and Charcot joint, and (3) postoperative complications
such as periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic joint infection within 2 years
after TKA. Two patients (two knees) were excluded as periprosthetic fractures within
2 years after TKA. Finally, 125 patients (206 cases) were included in the study ([Fig. 1 ]). Institutional review board approval was obtained before pursuing the retrospective
review of data.
Fig. 1 Patient selection for the study.
Surgical Techniques and Implants
All TKAs were performed with posterior stabilized patellar-friendly designed femoral
implants by a single senior surgeon. The surgical techniques were the same for all
TKAs. The medial parapatellar approach with a midline incision was used. Distal femoral
and proximal tibial bone resection was performed using an intramedullary guide. A
transepicondylar axis and Whiteside's line were used for femoral component rotation.[17 ] The size of the femoral component was determined by the posterior referencing method.
The rotation of the tibial component was set by considering not only the anatomical
landmarks such as the medial one-third of the tibial tuberosity (Insall's reference),
patella tendon, and alignment with femoral component and tibial crest.[17 ]
[18 ] In terms of patellar managements, the peripheral osteophytes around patella were
removed and the denuded patella was tried to be made flattened.[19 ] All patellar rims were denervated by electrocautery.[20 ] A partial lateral facetectomy was performed after the lateral peripatellar soft
tissue was released.[21 ]
[22 ] Patellar tracking was validated by the towel clip technique after the tourniquet
was deflated.[23 ]
Single-Photon Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Evaluation
SPECT/CT (GE Healthcare Milwaukee, WI) was performed after patients were injected
with 99 mTc-hydroxymethylenediphosphonate (HDP). This system incorporates a bone scintigraphy
and a CT scan in one step. Images of the knee were obtained 2 hours after injection
which were reconstructed in three planes: axial, coronal, and sagittal (SPECT with
128 × 128 matrix, 32 angular step, 35 seconds per frame, step and shoot).[11 ]
[24 ] BTU was graded on a four-scale system; grade 0, BTU was equivalent to normal cancellous
bone; grade 1, BTU was higher than normal cancellous bone and however lower than the
articular surface; grade 2, BTU was equivalent to the articular surface; and grade
3, BTU was higher than the articular surface.[11 ] Grades 1 and 2 were classified as the low uptake group and grades 3 and 4 were classified
as the high uptake group ([Fig. 2 ]).
Fig. 2 The grading system of single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography for patellofemoral
compartment; grade 0, BTU was equivalent to normal cancelous bone; grade 1, BTU was
higher than normal cancelous bone, however, lower than the articular surface; grade
2, BTU was equivalent to the articular surface; grade 3, BTU was higher than the articular
surface. BTU; bone tracer uptake.
Intraoperative Visual Grading of Cartilage Degeneration
The degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella was assessed intraoperatively.
The evaluation was based on the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and
recorded on the surgical record along the anatomical side of the medial and lateral
facets.[25 ] They were categorized into two groups; the low grade group (ICRS grade 0, 1, 2,
and 3) and the high grade group (ICRS grade 4) because the denuded patella was accepted
for patellar resurfacing to some surgeons.[3 ]
[4 ]
[5 ]
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluations
The Feller's patella score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
Index (WOMAC) were assessed for clinical evaluation.[26 ]
[27 ] To analyze how much difference in WOMAC Index score was clinically meaningful, minimal
clinically important meaningful difference (MCID) in the WOMAC index score was determined
according to the study of Clement et al.[28 ] After the score was being translated into a percentage, MCID for total score was
10, for pain was 11, for function was 9, and for stiffness was 8. Patellar tilting
angle and patellar lateral shift were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years
postoperatively.[29 ] Lateral patellar tilt was measured between the line bisecting the widest portion
of the patella and the line connecting the most anterior portion of the femoral condyles.
Lateral patella shift was defined as the proportion of the distance from the anterior
portion of the femoral condyle to the lateral portion of the patella compared with
the distance between the most anterior portion of the femoral condyles.[29 ]
The patients were similar in terms of demographic variables, preoperative clinical
and radiographic status regardless of the groups categorized by SPECT/CT and ICRS
grading ([Table 1 ]).
Table 1
Baseline of demographics and radiologic findings
Gr 1–3
(n = 166)
Gr 4
(n = 40)
p -Value
Low uptake group
(n = 120)
High uptake group
(n = 86)
p -Value
Demographics
Age (y)
69.5 ± 6.6
71.3 ± 5.2
0.114[a ]
70.0 ± 6.7
69.7 ± 5.9
0.703[a ]
BMI (kg/m2 )
27.2 ± 3.7
26.0 ± 3.2
0.061[a ]
27.1 ± 3.8
26.8 ± 3.4
0.563[a ]
Sex
0.655[b ]
0.960[b ]
Female (%)
151 (91)
38 (95)
110 (91.7)
79 (91.9)
Male (%)
15 (9)
2 (5)
10 (8.3)
7 (8.1)
Laterality
0.401[b ]
0.814[b ]
Right (%)
80 (69.0)
21 (52.5)
58 (48.3)
43 (50)
Left (%)
86 (51.8)
19 (47.5)
62 (51.7)
43 (50)
Physical examination
Range of motion (degrees)
117 ± 19.6
117 ± 17.4
0.671[b ]
117 ± 19.6
118 ± 19.1
0.682[b ]
Radiologic findings
Lateral patella tilt (degrees)
8.2 ± 4.3
7.5 ± 4.7
0.412[b ]
8.5 ± 4.3
7.4 ± 4.5
0.217[b ]
Lateral patella shift
10.5 ± 7.2
9.3 ± 8.0
0.407[b ]
10.6 ± 7.4
9.8 ± 7.5
0.785[b ]
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; Gr, the International Cartilage Repair Society
grade; HU, high uptake group; LU, low uptake group.
Statistical analysis:
a Independent sample t -test.
b Mann–Whitney test.
Statistical Analysis
The independent sample t -test and Mann–Whitney test were used to compare the demographic and radiographic
data. The correlation between the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the
patella in the intraoperative field and the degree of BTU on SPECT/CT was evaluated
by Goodman and Kruskal's gamma (γ) statistics. In addition, after comparing SPECT/CT
and intraoperative findings, the lesions were classified according to the anatomical
agreement into three groups: group matched, the anatomical sites of the most denuded
lesion and the highest BTU was properly matched; group partially matched, the anatomical
sites were mismatched but as BTU was found in the denuded lesion, the denuded lesion
could be included in SPECT/CT; and group mismatched, not only the anatomical sites
were mismatched, but also the denuded lesion was not included in SPECT/CT because
BTU was not observed in the denuded lesion ([Fig. 3 ]). To determine the risk of the presence of denuded patellar cartilage according
to the degree of BTU in SPECT/CT, a Chi-square test was performed. Repeated measures
analysis of variance was utilized to compare the clinical outcomes preoperatively
and 1 and 2 years postoperatively according to the intraoperative gross findings and
the findings on SPECT/CT. For post hoc analysis, the Mann–Whitney test was performed
where a p -value was corrected by the Bonferroni method. Statistical analyses were performed
with SPSS 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). A p -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Fig. 3 Comparing the anatomical site of the cartilage lesion in SPECT/CT and in intraoperative
field. After comparing SPECT/CT and intraoperative finding, the lesions were classified
according to the anatomical agreement into three groups: group matched, the anatomical
sites of the most denuded lesion and the highest BTU was properly matched; group partially
matched, the anatomical sites were mismatched but as BTU was found in the denuded
lesion, the denuded lesion could be included in SPECT/CT; and group mismatched, not
only the anatomical sites were mismatched, but also the denuded lesion was not included
in SPECT/CT because there was no BTU in the denuded lesion. (A ) group matched, (B ) group partially matched, and (C ) group mismatched. SPECT/CT, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography;
BTU, bone tracer uptake; ICRS, International Cartilage Repair Society.
Results
SPECT/CT reflected the degree of cartilage degeneration and the anatomical site of
the cartilage lesion in the PF joint. There was a strong association between the degree
of BTU and the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella (γ = 0.451,
p < 0.001; [Table 2 ]). The risk for the presence of ICRS grade 4 cartilage degeneration was greater in
the high uptake group than the low uptake group (odds ratio = 5.89, 95% confidence
interval: 2.69–12.92; [Table 2 ]). When comparing the anatomical site of the cartilage lesion on SPECT/CT with that
on intraoperative finding, the proportion at which SPECT/CT included the intraoperative
cartilage finding was 94.7% (group matched, 73.3% and group partially matched, 21.4%).
Table 2
The risk for cartilage degeneration according to the bone tracer uptake in single-photon
emission tomography/computed tomography
Bone tracer uptake
ICRS
γ[a ]
Gr 0 (n = 12)
Gr 1 (n = 12)
Gr 2 (n = 60)
Gr 3 (n = 82)
Gr 4 (n = 40)
Gr 0 (n = 11)
1
0
6
2
2
0.451
Gr 1 (n = 109)
10
11
33
47
8
Gr 2 (n = 71)
1
1
19
25
25
Gr 3 (n = 15)
0
0
2
8
5
Bone tracer uptake
ICRS
Odds ratio (95% CI)
p -Value[b ]
Gr 1–3 (n = 166)
Gr 4 (n = 40)
Low uptake (n = 86)
110
10
Reference value
High uptake (n = 120)
56
30
5.89 (2.69–12.92)
<0.001
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Gr, grade; ICRS, the International Cartilage
Repair Society; SPECT/CT, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography.
Statistical analysis:
a Goodman and Kruskal's gamma (γ) statistics.
b Chi-square test.
Clinical outcomes did not worsen by the severity of cartilage degeneration underneath
the patella evaluated in the intraoperative field, but also the degree of BTU in preoperative
SPECT/CT. There was no significant difference in clinical scores in total score and
subscale score including the incidence and severity of anterior knee pain after TKA
between the two groups ([Tables 3 ] and [4 ]; [Figs. 4 ] and [5 ]). The WOMAC index total score was 12.9 in the low grade group and 12.2 in the high
grade group, respectively at 2 years after TKA according to the ICRS grading system.
In addition, the WOMAC index total score was 12.8 in the low uptake group and 12.7
in the high uptake group, respectively, 2 years after TKA (p > 0.05) ([Tables 3 ] and [4 ]). Although the high uptake group showed more severe stiffness than the low uptake
group at 2 years after TKA (1.1 vs. 1.6, p = 0.007), it did not reach a clinically meaningful difference.
Fig. 4 Clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing according
to the severity of patellofemoral osteoarthritis evaluated by intraoperative findings.
(A ) Feller's patellar score and (B ) WOMAC index score. TKA, total knee arthroplasty; Gr, the International Cartilage
Repair Society grade, Preop; preoperative, POP; postoperative; WOMAC, Western Ontario
and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; *p -value < 0.05.
Fig. 5 Clinical outcomes after TKA without patellar resurfacing according to the severity
of PF osteoarthritis evaluated by SPECT/CT. (A ) Feller's patellar score and (B ) WOMAC index score. Preop, preoperative; POP, postoperative; PF, patellofemoral;
SPECT/CT, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography; TKA, total knee arthroplasty;
WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. *p -value < 0.05.
Table 3
Clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing according
to the degree of patellofemoral osteoarthritis evaluated by intraoperative findings
Preoperative
Postoperative 1 y
Postoperative 2 y
Gr 1–3
(n = 166)
Gr 4
(n = 40)
p -Value[a ]
Gr 1–3
(n = 166)
Gr 4
(n = 40)
p -Value[a ]
Gr 1–3
(n = 166)
Gr 4
(n = 40)
p -Value[a ]
Physical examination
Range of motion (degrees)
117 (19.6)
117 (17.4)
0.671
121 (13.8)
121 (12.3)
0.952
119 (15.9)
120 (15.8)
0.421
Radiologic findings
Lateral patella tilt (degrees)
8.2 (4.3)
7.5 (4.7)
0.412
5.2 (4.3)
5.6 (4.2)
0.591
4.5 (3.7)
5.2 (5.2)
0.965
Lateral patella shift
10.5 (7.2)
9.3 (8.0)
0.407
5.8 (6.5)
6.4 (7.0)
0.699
6.2 (5.8)
6.4 (7.4)
0.965
Incidence of anterior knee pain
62.7
57.5
0.942
15.1
12.5
0.652
14.5
17.5
0.175
Patella score
Anterior knee pain
10.7 (4.0)
10.4 (4.6)
0.788
14.3 (1.7)
14.4 (1.7)
0.802
14.3 (1.8)
14.1 (2.3)
0.653
Quadriceps strength
4.5 (0.9)
3.9 (1.4)
0.002
4.7 (0.7)
4.8 (0.7)
0.879
4.8 (0.6)
4.6 (0.8)
0.116
Ability to rise from chair
3.1 (0.8)
2.8 (0.8)
0.044
3.8 (1.1)
3.9 (1.0)
0.837
3.9 (1.0)
4.2 (1.0)
0.105
Stair-climbing
2.5 (0.9)
2.3 (0.7)
0.240
3.6 (1.1)
3.7 (1.0)
0.584
3.8 (0.9)
3.9 (0.9)
0.728
Total
20.7 (4.8)
19.3 (5.3)
0.137
26.5 (3.0)
26.8 (3.1)
0.553
26.9 (2.9)
26.8 (3.7)
0.550
WOMAC score
Pain
7.4 (2.9)
7.3 (2.4)
0.903
1.7 (2.4)
1.6 (3.3)
0.634
1.2 (1.8)
1.0 (1.7)
0.644
Stiffness
1.9 (1.9)
2.2 (2.1)
0.401
1.8 (1.7)
1.8 (1.8)
0.903
1.3 (1.6)
1.1 (1.3)
0.549
Function
24.8 (7.7)
24.5 (6.5)
0.798
15.1 (9.1)
13.6 (7.6)
0.519
12.9 (7.0)
12.2 (6.2)
0.650
Total
34.1 (10.5)
34.0 (9.2)
0.846
18.6 (11.7)
17.0 (10.8)
0.518
12.9 (7.0)
12.2 (6.2)
0.650
Abbreviations: TKA, total knee arthroplasty; PF, patellofemoral; Gr, the International
Cartilage Repair Society grade; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
Index.
Note: The values are represented as mean ( ± standard deviation).
a Statistical analysis: Mann–Whitney test, p -value was corrected by Bonferroni method.
Table 4
Clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing according
to the degree of patellofemoral osteoarthritis evaluated by SPECT/CT
Preoperative
Postoperative 1 y
Postoperative 2 y
LU
(n = 120)
HU
(n = 86)
p -Value[a ]
LU
(n = 120)
HU
(n = 86)
p -Value[a ]
LU
(n = 120)
HU
(n = 86)
p -Value[a ]
Physical examination
Range of motion (degrees)
117 (19.6)
118 (19.1)
0.682
120 (14.9)
122 (11.4)
0.416
119 (13.8)
120 (18.5)
0.165
Radiologic findings
Lateral patella tilt (degrees)
8.5 (4.3)
7.4 (4.5)
0.217
5.8 (4.6)
4.8 (3.8)
0.729
4.9 (4.4)
4.4 (3.6)
0.905
Lateral patella shift
10.6 (7.4)
9.8 (7.5)
0.785
5.6 (6.9)
6.4 (6.2)
0.362
6.0 (6.5)
6.6 (5.8)
0.449
Incidence of anterior knee pain
62.5
60.5
0.768
16.7
11.6
0.313
13.3
17.4
0.417
Patella score
Anterior knee pain
10.5 (4.2)
10.8 (4.0)
0.746
14.2 (1.8)
14.5 (1.5)
0.272
14.3 (2.0)
14.3 (1.7)
0.977
Quadriceps strength
4.4 (1.0)
4.4 (1.0)
0.952
4.7 (0.7)
4.7 (0.7)
0.754
4.8 (0.7)
4.8 (0.6)
0.376
Ability to rise from chair
2.9 (0.8)
3.2 (0.9)
0.013
3.9 (1.1)
3.8 (1.0)
0.671
4.0 (1.0)
4.0 (1.0)
0.532
Stair-climbing
2.4 (0.8)
2.6 (0.9)
0.093
3.6 (1.1)
3.6 (1.0)
0.889
3.8 (0.9)
3.8 (1.0)
0.901
Total
20.1 (5.0)
20.9 (4.7)
0.321
26.5 (3.1)
26.6 (2.8)
0.920
26.8 (3.3)
27.0 (2.8)
0.802
WOMAC score
Pain
7.7 (3.1)
7.0 (2.3)
0.093
1.8 (3.0)
1.4 (2.1)
0.318
1.2 (1.8)
1.0 (1.7)
0.249
Stiffness
2.0 (2.0)
2.0 (2.0)
0.995
1.8 (1.7)
1.8 (1.7)
0.779
1.1 (1.4)
1.6 (1.6)
0.007
Function
25.6 (8.1)
23.4 (6.5)
0.112
14.9 (9.8)
14.6 (7.2)
0.558
12.8 (7.1)
12.7 (6.4)
0.780
Total
35.3 (11.3)
32.3 (8.3)
0.167
18.6 (12.8)
17.8 (9.6)
0.723
12.8 (7.1)
12.7 (6.4)
0.780
Note: The values are represented as mean ( ± standard deviation).
Abbreviations: HU, high uptake group; LU, low uptake group; PF, patellofemoral; SPECT/CT,
single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography; TKA, total knee arthroplasty;
WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
a Statistical analysis: Mann–Whitney test, p -Value was corrected by Bonferroni method.
Discussion
The indication for selective patellar resurfacing is controversial. Several surgeons
have previously reported that denuded patella is required to be resurfaced.[4 ]
[5 ]
[6 ] Others reported that there was no difference in clinical outcomes according to the
severity of PF OA regardless of patella resurfacing.[7 ]
[8 ]
[9 ]
[10 ] As SPECT/CT reflected the subchondral status before the structural change occurred,
the evaluation of clinical outcomes related to PF after TKA according to SPECT/CT
might be helpful to surgeons in managing the PF compartment.[15 ] The principal finding of our study was that SPECT/CT reflected the degree of cartilage
degeneration underneath the patella in the patients with end-stage OA who underwent
TKA. However, there was no difference in clinical outcome along the cartilage degeneration
underneath the patella, as evaluated by intraoperative grading. Although the patients
with higher uptake in SPECT/CT showed more severe stiffness after TKA, it did not
reach any clinically meaningful difference. Therefore, the severity of PF OA even
evaluated by SPECT/CT did not predict worse clinical and radiologic outcomes until
2 years after TKA without patellar resurfacing.
The results of our study confirmed our hypothesis that there would be increased BTU
in the PF joint according to the degree of patellar cartilage degeneration. Studies
have reported the relationship between the cartilage lesion on MRI, knee arthroscopy,
and the BTU on SPECT/CT.[11 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
[14 ] The BTU was higher as the size of the cartilage lesion increased and as the degree
of cartilage degeneration was severe.[14 ] The degree of cartilage degeneration on knee arthroscopy was agreement with BTU
in SPECT/CT (r = 0.625).[11 ] Mass et al claimed that nonmorphological cartilage lesion was found on MRI in 35%
of patients with increased BTU.[13 ] They suggested this finding might be an early stage of cartilage pathology.[13 ] Our findings are in line with the studies that have demonstrated that SPECT/CT reflected
the degenerative state of cartilage. A total of 73.3% (group matched) showed current
cartilage degeneration and 21.4% (group partially matched) reflected the nonmorphological
cartilage lesion. Therefore, SPECT/CT is probably one of the modalities to show not
only the current degenerative state, but also the condition before the structural
change was found.
The results of our findings did not support our hypothesis that the PF clinical outcome
and functional outcome would be worse in patients with increased PF BTU in SPECT/CT.
Studies have reported that there is more anterior knee pain and poor clinical outcomes
after TKA without patellar resurfacing in patients with severe PF OA.[4 ]
[5 ] However, Studies have revealed that the severity of PF OA is not related to worse
clinical and radiographic outcomes and that patellar resurfacing could not improve
clinical outcomes in patients with severe PF OA.[7 ]
[10 ] In our study, the stiffness subscale of the WOMAC index score was statistically
worse in the high uptake group on SPECT/CT. These findings seem to concur with previous
reports. However, the MCID for stiffness was 8 after the score was translated into
a percentage.[28 ]
[30 ] The difference between the two groups in our study (0.5) could be translated into
6.5 according to the aforementioned method. This suggested that although the difference
in the stiffness subscale score was statistically meaningful, it did not reach any
clinically meaningful difference. Therefore, there was no clinically meaningful outcome
difference according to the severity of PF OA even evaluated by SPECT/CT.
Several limitations should be considered in our study. First, the study was designed
retrospectively and the proportion of females was higher than males. Therefore, the
same results may not apply to populations with different sex proportions. However,
in Asians, it is well known that OA is more frequent in women, and even in Westerners,
it is known that there are more knee OAs in women.[31 ]
[32 ]
[33 ] Thus, the author believes that our research can provide valuable information to
readers. Second, methods to evaluate the clinical outcome of the PF joint have not
been established.[34 ] Therefore, if we used another score system, the study had the possibility to show
different results. Fourth, PF outcomes might be influenced not only by the patella,
but also the anterior portion of the distal femur. As the anterior portion of the
distal femur was resurfaced during TKA, the effect of the PF compartment might be
decreased. Additionally, we did not leave the patella alone, but did several procedures
such as resection of the peripheral osteophyte, patelloplasty, peripatellar neurectomy,
and partial lateral facetectomy with lateral peripatellar soft tissue release. These
procedures might positively affect the PF compartment. Fifth, although the stiffness
subscale score did not reach any clinical meaningful difference at 2-year follow-up
study, it reached the statistical difference at 2 years after surgery which did not
observed in 1 year after surgery. It is possible that longer follow-up may be associated
with additional outcome degradation. Finally, our findings were made among the patient
who did not have patellar resurfacing. If the PF compartment with high uptake on SPECT/CT
was performed with patellar resurfacing, the clinical outcome could have been different.
Conclusion
Visual assessment of the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella and
preoperative SPECT/CT evaluations of the PF joint were not predictive of early postoperative
clinical outcome after TKA performed without patellar resurfacing.
