Keywords
Ewing’s sarcoma - musculoskeletal soft tissue - oncology - pediatric - rhabdomyosarcoma
Introduction
Ewing’s sarcoma was first described in 1921 by James Ewing as an osteolytic bone tumor
composed of malignant small round cells.[1]
[2] Extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma (EES) was first described in 1969[3]; it is a malignant mesenchymal tumor much rarer than its intraosseous counterpart.
The few case series and reports of EES that have been published in English literature
in the last decade have been listed in [Table 1].[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] There are a few malignant and benign entities that may mimic an EES on imaging and
therefore, it is essential that radiologists be familiar with this entity and its
radiological aspects to help render an accurate diagnosis. This article depicts the
imaging appearances and findings of five EESs in various anatomical sites, involving
multiple modalities ([Table 2]). Pathologic features of EESs are discussed. This review is written with the intent
to enhance the existing knowledge base/awareness among radiologists of this rare entity.
Table 1
Published studies pertaining to Extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma in the past decade
Author
|
Year
|
Type of study
|
No of cases
|
El Weshi et al5
|
2010
|
Case series
|
57
|
Muratori et al4
|
2020
|
Case series
|
29
|
Barnardt and Roux6
|
2013
|
Case series
|
2
|
Mathew et al8
|
2019
|
Case report
|
1
|
Bang et al7
|
2018
|
Case report
|
1
|
Table 2
Patient demographics and location of tumors
Age (y)
|
Sex
|
Location
|
Imaging characteristics
|
1
|
Male
|
Occipital scalp (Fig. 1)
|
Heterogeneous subcutaneous soft tissue lesion without bony invasion on computed tomography
|
7
|
Female
|
Posterior neck (Fig. 2)
|
Subcutaneous soft tissue lesion, hypoechoic with hyperechoic foci and internal vascularity
on Doppler
|
26
|
Female
|
Left thigh (Fig. 3)
|
Predominantly solid with heterogeneous echogenicity and cystic areas/internal vascularity.
Mildly T1 and T2 hyperintense solid mass with peripheral enhancement and central necrosis
|
20
|
Female
|
Right inguinal (Fig. 4)
|
Soft tissue mass with heterogeneous increased multicysitc T2 hyperintense mass with
septations. Heterogeneous enhancement with areas of cystic change/necrosis
|
19
|
Male
|
Right shoulder (Fig. 5)
|
T1 isointense and T2 hyperintense solid mass that diffusely enhances and contains
a few flow voids representing vessels
|
Discussion
Ewing’s sarcomas are common bone tumors in children.[9] EES is rarer, more commonly found in older children/adults, and often carries a
poorer prognosis.[5]
[10] EES has increasingly been reported from diverse sites whose origin has been attributed
to ectopic neural and neuroectodermal proliferations. Genetic studies have suggested
that EESs are in the same family as primitive neuroectodermal (PNET) tumors. Furthermore,
genetic studies have demonstrated reciprocal translocation of t(11; 22)(q24; q12)
in approximately 95% of patients, with the remainder demonstrating t(21; 22) (q22;
q12) translocation.[11]
[12] Generally, these tumors are commonly seen in the paravertebral regions or in the
deep soft tissues of the extremities, with lower extremities having a higher propensity
than upper extremities.[9] Patients with EES often note a rapidly growing soft-tissue mass, with about one-third
being painful secondary to compression of adjacent structures. They often present
in the second decade of life. There is a mild male predominance and predilection for
Caucasians. There has not been any evidence of familial or environmental influence.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
Radiographs may demonstrate a nonspecific soft-tissue mass in proximity to a bone
without gross osseous involvement.[9]
[15]
[16] Computed tomography (CT) usually shows a soft tissue mass with similar attenuation
as skeletal muscle ([Fig. 1]).[9]
[15] Adjacent bone involvement is uncommon ([Fig. 1]).[9]
[15] Calcification is exceedingly rare[9]
[15] and this feature was a consistent imaging appearance in our patients. Sonographic
findings are variable and nonspecific, and often demonstrate a hypoechoic, heterogeneous
mass with internal vascularity ([Fig. 2]).[9]
[15] Cystic change and necrosis may be seen ([Figs. 3 ]and [4]).[9]
[15]
Fig. 1 (A, B) Axial CT (A) shows a circumscribed homogeneous subcutaneous mass in the right occipital scalp
(white arrows). Bone windows (B) shows no erosion of the calvarium by the mass (white arrows). CT, computed tomography.
Fig. 2 (A, B) Sagittal ultrasound images (A, B) show a circumscribed solid hypoechoic mass (white arrows) with small echogenic striations
and mild internal vascularity (arrowheads) in the subcutaneous soft tissue of the
right posterior neck.
Fig. 3 (A–D) Sagittal ultrasound image (A) of the left proximal thigh shows a mass with heterogeneous echogenicity (white arrows)
which is predominantly solid with some areas of cystic change/necrosis. Internal vascularity
(white arrowheads) is seen with Doppler imaging. The axial T1 (B), T2 (C), and postcontrast (D) MRI images of the proximal thigh show a mass with mixed T1 and T2 signal and thick
inhomogeneous peripheral enhancement with areas of central necrosis (white arrows).
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) include a mass with signal intensity
similar to skeletal muscle on T1-weighted imaging ([Figs. 5 ]and [6])[9]
[15]; internal areas of hemorrhage may be seen as high T1 signal ([Fig. 3]).[9]
[15] On T2-weighted images, the mass often demonstrates a heterogeneous intermediate
to hyperintense signal. High T2 signal areas representing foci of cystic or necrotic
changes are common ([Fig. 4]).[9]
[15] On postcontrast images, there is often heterogeneous enhancement ([Figs 3]
[4]
[5]–[6]). High-flow vascular channels or flow voids may also be seen ([Fig. 5]) which is extremely common, although not unique to EES.[9]
[15] Some of these masses may be quite complex, having undergone cystic degeneration/necrosis,
and may contain internal septations ([Fig. 4]).[9]
[15] Fluid-fluid levels may also be observed.[13]
[15]
[17]
[18]
Fig. 4 (A–F) Sonographic image (A) demonstrates a predominantly hypoechoic mass (white arrows) in the right groin with
internal septations. Axial CT (B) demonstrates a heterogeneous well-circumscribed soft-tissue mass (white arrows)
in the right groin without evidence of calcification. Axial T2 fat sat (C), T1 (D), postcontrast axial T1 (E), and coronal (F) MRI images demonstrate a complex predominantly multicystic mass, in the right groin
(white arrow) with a thin rim of peripheral enhancement and an eccentric inhomogeneous
soft tissue component at its superior aspect (white arrowheads). CT, computed tomography;
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Fig. 5 (A–D) Axial T1 (A), T2 (B), T2 fat sat (C) postcontrast T1 fat sat (D), MRI images demonstrate a T1 isointense and T2 hyperintense enhancing mass (white
arrows) within the right anterior deltoid muscle. Flow voids representing vessels
(arrowhead in B). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Fig. 6 (A–D) Axial STIR (A), axial T1 (B), sagittal and axial (C, D) postcontrast MRI images demonstrate a T2 hyperintense and T1 isointense mass with
heterogeneous enhancement and areas of cystic change/necrosis (black arrowheads) within
the left biceps muscle (white arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
On gross pathological specimen, EES often appears gray-yellow or gray-tan with lobulations
and a soft texture.[9] Histopathology confirms EES via monotonous proliferation of small blue round cells
solidly packed with intracellular glycogen which may indent nuclei ([Figs. 7 ]and [8]).[9] Cystic/necrotic regions demonstrating rich vascularity, and areas of hemorrhage
are often present. Membrane staining is almost always positive for CD99 ([Figs. 7 ]and [8]).[19]
[20] Histologic staining for FLI1, demonstrating t(11; 22), will provide definitive diagnosis
([Fig. 8]).[19]
Fig. 7 (A–C) Histopathological images from patient in Fig. 5: Low (A) and high (B) power views of the classic round blue cell look that is seen with neuroblastoma,
rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, and lymphoma. Immunohistochemical stain for CD-99
(C), which is a Beta 2 Microglobulin on the outside of the cell gives the brown outline.
In a mass CD-99 is not specific for Ewing’s sarcoma but is highly characteristic.
Fig. 8 (A–C) Histopathological images from patient in Fig. 6: High power view (A) of the small round blue cell tumor. The CD99 staining (B) demonstrates a brown rim around the cells, highly characteristic of, though not
specific for, Ewing sarcoma. The FLI1 (C) is a new immunohistochemical stain that looks for the chromosome 11–22 translocation
(EMS-FLI1) which is characteristic of Ewing’s sarcoma and stains the nucleus brown
as seen in this patient.
Treatment often involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy typically with ifosfamide and etoposide
followed by a combination of surgical excision and radiation therapy.[4]
[5]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25] Increased tumor burden and distant metastasis at presentation are associated with
a poor overall survival.[4] The 5-year survival for patients with localized disease is around 60% and 40% for
patients with metastatic disease.[26]
Differential Diagnosis
Differential considerations of EES mainly include rhabdomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma
([Table 3]).
Table 3
Differential diagnosis for Extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma
Tumor
|
Age (peak)
|
Sex
|
Location
|
Imaging
|
Rhabdomyosarcoma
|
First decade
|
Slight male predilection
|
Anywhere in the body. The alveolar and pleomorphic variants having a predilection
for extremities
|
Heterogeneous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity and enhancement. Flow
voids. Bone involvement in 25%
|
Synovial sarcoma
|
Third decade of life
|
Female predilection
|
Juxta-articular regions
|
“Bowl of grapes” and “triple sign” appearance on MRI from areas of necrosis and hemorrhage.
Calcification in 30% of patients.
|
Neuroblastoma
|
One
|
No sex predilection
|
Adrenal and paravertebral
|
Necrosis or hemorrhage, and calcifications are common. MRI demonstrates high and low
T1 and T2 signal, related to calcification, hemorrhage, and necrosis.
|
Extraosseous mesenchymal chondrosarcoma
|
Second to third decade.
|
Female predilection
|
Head and neck
|
Central or eccentric mineralization. MRI variable low signal mineralization with T2
hyperintensity and intense heterogeneous enhancement
|
Venous malformation
|
Any age
|
No sex predilection
|
No site predilection
|
Highly vascular lesion with thrombus, or phlebolith, on imaging
|
Neuroblastoma and lymphoma are less common considerations. Benign entities such as
a venous malformation, especially the microcystic type, soft-tissue abscesses, and
hematomas can also mimic a soft tissue tumor. Rare tumors, such as extraosseous mesenchymal
chondrosarcomas, may also be included in the differential for an EES.
Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft tissue malignancy in children and may be
painless though rapidly growing. CT will demonstrate a soft-tissue density ([Fig. 9]) with heterogeneous enhancement ± adjacent bony destruction.[27] MRI demonstrates T1 isointensity to muscle ± areas of hemorrhage and T2 hyperintensity
to muscle associated with avid enhancement.[28] There may be prominent flow voids (in alveolar subtype). Embryonal, alveolar, and
pleomorphic histologic subtypes, all show skeletal muscle differentiation which is
key to histopathological diagnosis ([Fig. 9]).[27]
[28]
[29]
Fig. 9 (A–C) Axial CT image (A) demonstrates a left axillary mass (white arrow). Hematoxylin and eosin magnification
×400 specimen (B) demonstrating skeletal muscle differentiation (black arrow). Rhabdomyoblasts highlighted
by desmin stain (C). CT, computed tomography.
Synovial sarcomas are the most common nonrhabdomyosarcomatous childhood malignancies
of the lower extremities.[30] These slow growing masses have predilection for juxta-articular regions.[30]
[31] CT examination will demonstrate a heterogeneous soft-tissue mass with or without
calcifications ([Fig. 10]). MRI demonstrates a mass, generally isointense to muscle on T1-weighted imaging,
with heterogeneous and hyperintense T2 signal from necrosis, areas of hemorrhage,
and bands of fibrosis. The combination of largely cystic areas and prominent hemorrhagic
foci often creates a “bowl of grapes appearance.”[30] Although the poorly differentiated subtype is histologically similar to EES, monophasic
subtype reveals uniform atypical spindle cells, while biphasic subtypes have an epithelial
element ([Fig. 10]).[32] “Synovial” is a misnomer, as these tumors are not derived from synovium. Cytogenetic
studies show translocation of (x; 18).[30]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
Fig. 10 (A, B) Axial CT (A) demonstrates a soft tissue mass (white arrow) in the anterior right upper thorax
extending between the ribs. Hematoxylin and eosin magnification ×160 (B) shows short, uniform, moderately atypical spindle cells, consistent with monophasic
synovial sarcoma. CT, computed tomography.
Outside of the adrenal gland, neuroblastomas (NBLs) are often paravertebral in location
but in a younger demographic than EES.[36]
[37] Laboratory assessment will commonly show elevated urinary catecholamine levels.[36] Bony metastases are common and may be the presenting finding.[36] On ultrasound, NBLs are heterogeneous solid lesions, mostly echogenic.[36] The masses may appear heterogeneous from necrosis or hemorrhage, and calcifications
are common.[36] CT or MRI can accurately assess the location and the size of the primary tumor and
identify vascular encasement which determines tumor resectability.[36]
[37] Coarse, finely stippled, or curvilinear calcifications are seen in 85% of the neuroblastomas.[36] MRI demonstrates high and low signal on T1 and T2 imaging, related to calcification,
hemorrhage, and necrosis.[36]
[38] Microscopic features include immature, undifferentiated sympathetic cells.[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
Lymphomas are differentiated from EES via identification of lymph node involvement;
EES rarely involves lymph nodes.[43]
[44]
[45]
Extraosseous mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are painless, slowly growing masses with
chondroid matrix ([Fig. 11]). The lesion is extremely rare in patients younger than 20 years of age. On CT,
a soft tissue mass with similar attenuation to muscle is demonstrated with either
central or eccentric mineralization.[46]
[47] Necrosis may be present, and enhancement is heterogeneous. MRI findings include
a soft-tissue mass containing variable low-signal mineralization with isointensity
to muscle on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging and intense
heterogeneous enhancement ([Fig. 11]).[46] Histopathologic features include a biomorphic appearance with well-differentiated
cartilage surrounded by sheets of closely packed undifferentiated cells. Stains are
positive for S100, neuron-specific enolase, and Leu-7, and negative for actin, epithelial
membrane antigen, and cytokeratin.[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
Fig. 11 (A–C) Extra osseous mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the left thigh. AP radiograph of the
femur (A) showing a calcified mass (white arrow) in thigh. The mass (white arrow) is T1 isointense
(B) with enhancement (white arrow) on the postcontrast images (C). AP, anteroposterior.
Benign entities including venous malformations, soft-tissue abscesses, and hematoma
can be distinguished based on several key features. Rapidly growing venous malformations
can be distinguished by identifying a highly vascular lesion with thrombus or phlebolith
on imaging. Soft-tissue abscesses are often thick rimmed, with irregular peripheral
enhancement, and the patient usually has systemic and local symptoms of infection.
Hematomas may show dark signal on susceptibility weighted sequences due to presence
of blood products.[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
Conclusion
EES should be considered in the differential diagnosis when a circumscribed, aggressive
appearing mass is encountered in the lower extremities or paravertebral regions of
an older child/adolescent. Features, like flow voids, T1 signal similar to muscle,
proximity to bone without gross osseous involvement in the early stages, cystic changes/necrosis,
and lack of calcification, are seen in EES and are helpful in narrowing the differential
diagnosis.