J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(S 02): e395-e400
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729909
Original Article

Endoscopic Endonasal versus Transcranial Optic Canal Decompression: A Morphometric, Cadaveric Study

Jun Kim*
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Aaron R Plitt*
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Awais Vance
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Scott Connors
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
James Caruso
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Babu Welch
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
,
Tomas Garzon-Muvdi
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction Decompression of the optic nerve within the optic canal is indicated for compressive visual decline. The two most common approaches utilized for optic canal decompression are a medial approach with an endoscopic endonasal approach and a lateral approach with a craniotomy. Our study is a cadaveric anatomical study comparing the length and circumference of the orbit decompressed via an endoscopic endonasal approach versus a frontotemporal craniotomy.

Methods Five cadaveric specimens were utilized. Predissection computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on each specimen. On each specimen, a standard frontotemporal craniotomy with anterior clinoidectomy and superolateral orbital decompression was performed on one side and an endoscopic endonasal approach with medial wall decompression was performed on the contralateral side. Post-dissection CT scans were performed. An independent radiologist provided measurements of the length (mm) and circumference (degrees) of optic canal decompression bilaterally.

Results The mean length of optic canal decompression for open and endoscopic approach was 13 mm (range 12–15 mm) and 12.4 mm (range 10–16 mm), respectively. The mean circumference of decompression for open and endoscopic approaches was 252.8 degrees (range 205–280 degrees) and 124.6 degrees (range 100–163 degrees), respectively.

Conclusion The endoscopic endonasal and the transcranial approaches provide a similar length of optic canal decompression, but the transcranial approach leads to greater circumferential decompression. The endoscopic endonasal approach has the benefit of being minimally invasive, though. Ultimately, the surgical approach decision should be based on the location of the pathology and the surgeon's comfort.

* Co-authorship.




Publication History

Received: 29 August 2020

Accepted: 19 March 2021

Article published online:
29 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Slavin KV, Dujovny M, Soeira G, Ausman JI. Optic canal: microanatomic study. Skull Base Surg 1994; 4 (03) 136-144
  • 2 Mesquita Filho PM, Prevedello DM, Prevedello LM. et al. Optic canal decompression: comparison of 2 surgical techniques. World Neurosurg 2017; 104: 745-751
  • 3 Abhinav K, Acosta Y, Wang WH. et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the optic canal: anatomic considerations and surgical relevance. Neurosurgery 2015; 11 (Suppl. 03) 431-445 , discussion 445–446
  • 4 Emanuelli E, Bignami M, Digilio E, Fusetti S, Volo T, Castelnuovo P. Post-traumatic optic neuropathy: our surgical and medical protocol. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (11) 3301-3309
  • 5 Li H, Zhou B, Shi J, Cheng L, Wen W, Xu G. Treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy: our experience of endoscopic optic nerve decompression. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (12) 1325-1329
  • 6 Bowers CA, Sorour M, Patel BC, Couldwell WT. Outcomes after surgical treatment of meningioma-associated proptosis. J Neurosurg 2016; 125 (03) 544-550
  • 7 Carta F, Siccardi D, Cossu M, Viola C, Maiello M. Removal of tumours of the orbital apex via a postero-lateral orbitotomy. J Neurosurg Sci 1998; 42 (04) 185-188
  • 8 Rimmer RA, Graf AE, Fastenberg JH. et al. Management of orbital masses: outcomes of endoscopic and combined approaches with no orbital reconstruction. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 2020; 11: 2152656719899922
  • 9 Beer-Furlan A, Evins AI, Rigante L. et al. Endoscopic extradural anterior clinoidectomy and optic nerve decompression through a pterional port. J Clin Neurosci 2014; 21 (05) 836-840
  • 10 Berhouma M, Jacquesson T, Abouaf L, Vighetto A, Jouanneau E. Endoscopic endonasal optic nerve and orbital apex decompression for nontraumatic optic neuropathy: surgical nuances and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (04) E19
  • 11 Bingham CM, Harris MA, Vidor IA. et al. Transcranial orbital decompression for progressive compressive optic neuropathy after 3-wall decompression in severe graves' orbitopathy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 30 (03) 215-218
  • 12 Kong DS, Shin HJ, Kim HY. et al. Endoscopic optic canal decompression for compressive optic neuropathy. J Clin Neurosci 2011; 18 (11) 1541-1545
  • 13 Jefferis JM, Jones RK, Currie ZI, Tan JH, Salvi SM. Orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease: methods, outcomes, and complications. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32 (03) 626-636
  • 14 Mehta P, Durrani OM. Outcome of deep lateral wall rim-sparing orbital decompression in thyroid-associated orbitopathy: a new technique and results of a case series. Orbit 2011; 30 (06) 265-268
  • 15 Sellari-Franceschini S, Berrettini S, Santoro A. et al. Orbital decompression in graves' ophthalmopathy by medial and lateral wall removal. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133 (02) 185-189
  • 16 Castelnuovo P, Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Locatelli D, Dallan I. Endoscopic endonasal management of orbital pathologies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2015; 26 (03) 463-472
  • 17 Dallan I, Lenzi R, de Notaris M. et al. Quantitative study on endoscopic endonasal approach to the posterior sino-orbito-cranial interface: implications and clinical considerations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271 (08) 2197-2203
  • 18 Di Somma A, Cavallo LM, de Notaris M. et al. Endoscopic endonasal medial-to-lateral and transorbital lateral-to-medial optic nerve decompression: an anatomical study with surgical implications. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (01) 199-208
  • 19 Lal D, Stankiewicz JA. Endoscopic optic nerve decompression. Oper Tech Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg 2009; 20 (02) 96-100
  • 20 Locatelli M, Caroli M, Pluderi M. et al. Endoscopic transsphenoidal optic nerve decompression: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33 (03) 257-262
  • 21 Lund VJ, Rose GE. Endoscopic transnasal orbital decompression for visual failure due to sphenoid wing meningioma. Eye (Lond) 2006; 20 (10) 1213-1219
  • 22 Pletcher SD, Metson R. Endoscopic optic nerve decompression for nontraumatic optic neuropathy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (08) 780-783
  • 23 Sieskiewicz A, Lyson T, Mariak Z, Rogowski M. Endoscopic trans-nasal approach for biopsy of orbital tumours using image-guided neuro-navigation system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (05) 441-445 , discussion 445
  • 24 Chiarullo M, Mura J, Rubino P. et al; Study of Feasibility and Proof of Concept. Technical description of minimally invasive extradural anterior clinoidectomy and optic nerve decompression. World Neurosurg 2019; 129: e502-e513
  • 25 Di Somma A, Andaluz N, Gogela SL. et al. Surgical freedom evaluation during optic nerve decompression: laboratory investigation. World Neurosurg 2017; 101: 227-235
  • 26 Gogela SL, Zimmer LA, Keller JT, Andaluz N. Refining operative strategies for optic nerve decompression: a morphometric analysis of transcranial and endoscopic endonasal techniques using clinical parameters. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 14 (03) 295-302
  • 27 McDermott MW, Durity FA, Rootman J, Woodhurst WB. Combined frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach for tumors of the sphenoid wing and orbit. Neurosurgery 1990; 26 (01) 107-116
  • 28 Yang Y, Wang H, Shao Y, Wei Z, Zhu S, Wang J. Extradural anterior clinoidectomy as an alternative approach for optic nerve decompression: anatomic study and clinical experience. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (04, Suppl 2): discussion ONS262 ONS253-ONS262
  • 29 Murchison AP, Rosen MR, Evans JJ, Bilyk JR. Endoscopic approach to the orbital apex and periorbital skull base. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (03) 463-467
  • 30 Netuka D, Masopust V, Belšán T, Profantová N, Beneš V. Endoscopic endonasal resection of medial orbital lesions with intraoperative MRI. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (03) 455-461
  • 31 Paluzzi A, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC. et al. “Round-the-clock” surgical access to the orbit. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (01) 12-24
  • 32 Turri-Zanoni M, Dallan I, Terranova P. et al. Frontoethmoidal and intraorbital osteomas: exploring the limits of the endoscopic approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 138 (05) 498-504
  • 33 Michalinos A, Zogana S, Kotsiomitis E, Mazarakis A, Troupis T. Anatomy of the ophthalmic artery: a review concerning its modern surgical and clinical applications. Anat Res Int 2015; 2015: 591961
  • 34 Snyderman C, Kassam A, Carrau R, Mintz A, Gardner P, Prevedello DM. Acquisition of surgical skills for endonasal skull base surgery: a training program. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (04) 699-705