Keywords
autopsy - COVID-19 - pathology - SARS-CoV-2
Introduction
The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona
virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread from its origin in Wuhan City of the Hubei Province
of China to the rest of the world.[1] Till August 9 of the year 2020, more than 19 million cases of coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19) and more than 7 lakh deaths were reported across the world, while
the number of deaths is continuously increasing.[2] In India, the first confirmed case of COVID-19 was reported on January 30, 2020,
and since then, the virus has spread across the country with many cities becoming
the epicenters of the pandemic.[3] Till August 9, 2020, more than 2 million cases of COVID-19 and more than 43,000
deaths were reported from India.[2]
The pathobiology of the disease is poorly known, and significant efforts have been
made to understand the disease process worldwide. Based on clinical characteristics,
it has been observed that 20% of COVID-19 patients develop severe disease with high
mortality rate and are associated with older age and immunosuppression.[4]
[5] Clinical autopsies are known to have a vital role in developing an understanding
of the disease process. A few case series have been published from Western world.
However, there is dearth of literature on histopathological findings in COVID-19 deaths
from the Indian subcontinent. At our center, we have made an effort to study COVID-19
deaths on histopathology by doing minimally invasive autopsies. In this report, we
are reporting histopathologic findings of 21 cases.
Material and Methods
The study was conducted in a tertiary care center in Western India. In COVID-19 pandemic,
clinical autopsy protocols have been modified and minimally invasive autopsies have
been performed in all COVID-19 positive cases where we could obtain consent from the
next of kin of the deceased. Similar procedure was adopted for COVID-19 suspect cases
whose COVID-19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing report
was not available at the time of death. Minimally invasive autopsy was done in the
form of postmortem core needle biopsies from visceral organs including lungs, liver,
and bone marrow within an hour after death. Random sampling was done from both the
lungs and involving all the lobes. This was done with all biosafety measures taking
help of last radiographic images and surface anatomical landmarks. The tissue specimens
were kept in neutral buffered formalin for 48 hours and then processed with standard
biosafety measures.
Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were prepared, and slides were reviewed by
three pathologists (V.V., A.P., and P.A.E.). Special stains (Periodic acid-Schiff,
Masson’s trichrome, and Elastic Van Gieson) were done, wherever required. Semi-quantitative
assessment of histopathological findings was performed in lung and liver parenchyma
(0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = prominent). Immunohistochemistry was performed for TTF-1
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, 8G7G3/1, 1:100), p63 (Dako, DAK-p63, ready to use), CD3
(Dako, polyclonal, ready to use), CD4 (Dako, 4B12, ready to use), CD8 (Dako, DK25,
ready to use), CD20 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, L26, 1:250), and CD68 (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, KP-1, 1:400) in lung tissue while CD68 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, KP-1,
1:400) alone was performed in liver and bone marrow. Electronic medical records of
all cases were reviewed retrospectively and patients’ clinical details (including
presenting complaints, presence of co-morbidities, duration symptom onset to death
and duration of hospital stay) and results of laboratory investigations (including
complete blood count, X-ray chest, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, and liver function
tests) were noted. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, whenever
applicable. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Institute
(certificate reference number AIIMS/IEC/2020–21/3058).
Results
Clinical Features and Laboratory Findings
We obtained consent in 24 deceased cases wherein minimal autopsies were performed.
Of these 24 cases, 3 cases were negative on RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. The clinical
presentation included shortness of breath (100% cases), fever (71.4%), and cough (52.4%).
The median age of COVID-19 positive cases was 63 years (range 28–73 years). Nearly
three-fourths (76.2%) of these cases were ≥ 60 years with male predominance (M:F ratio
was 4:1). Most cases (85.7%) had comorbidities in the form of diabetes mellitus (57.1%)
and/or hypertension (47.6%).
On investigations, nine patients (42.8%) had mild anemia, eight (38.1%) had mild neutrophilic
leukocytosis, four (19%) patients had mild thrombocytopenia, and six (28.6%) cases
had mildly deranged liver function tests. One case of chronic lymphoproliferative
disorder revealed lymphocytic leukocytosis. Chest X-rays were done at the time of
admission and revealed lung changes in the form of unilateral and bilateral pneumonia
with ground glass opacities in 5 (23.8%) and 14 cases (66.7%), respectively. Duration
of clinical course (symptom onset to death) ranged from 3 to 35 days whereas average
duration of hospital stay was 6.9 days (ranging from 2 to 31 days). Nineteen cases
had severe disease with SpO2 < 90% while two cases had moderate disease with SpO2
approximately 92%. All these cases received anticoagulants (low-molecular weight heparin,
subcutaneous) and steroids (dexamethasone). During the course of hospital stay, all
cases, except one case with moderate activity, had to be put on mechanical ventilation.
The one case with moderate activity had sudden rapid deterioration of the clinical
course and died before mechanical ventilation could be instituted. Detailed clinical
characteristics, laboratory, and radiological findings are provided in [Table 1].
Table 1
Clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 suspect and positive cases
|
Age (years)/sex
|
Comorbidities
|
Hb (g/dL)
|
TLC (/m3)
|
Platelets (/m3)
|
LFT
|
D-dimer (µg/mL)
|
Chest X-ray
|
RFT (Sr Cr/Sr Urea
|
|
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; BLO, bilateral lung opacities; CAD, coronary
artery disease; CLPD, chronic lymphoproliferative disorder; COVID-19, coronavirus
disease 2019; Cr, creatinine; D, deranged; DM, diabetes mellitus; Hb, hemoglobin;
HTN, hypertension; ILD, interstitial lung disease; LFT, liver function test; N, normal;
NA, not available; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; RFT, renal function test; Sr, serum;
TLC, total leukocyte count; ULO, unilateral lung opacities.
aCOVID negative cases.
.. indicates absence of co-morbidities.
|
|
Case 1
|
69/M
|
DM
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
D
|
2.18
|
BLO
|
1.78/89
|
|
Case 2
|
65/F
|
DM, HTN, CAD
|
10.9
|
6.73
|
265
|
N
|
NA
|
BLO
|
1.38/40
|
|
Case 3a
|
45/M
|
··
|
11.5
|
7.07
|
60
|
D
|
NA
|
N
|
1.07/50
|
|
Case 4a
|
65/M
|
DM, HTN
|
6.6
|
0.45
|
12
|
D
|
5.63
|
ULO
|
4.38/193
|
|
Case 5
|
28/M
|
DM, Nocardiosis
|
11.7
|
17.7
|
210
|
D
|
2.03
|
ULO
|
0.88/98
|
|
Case 6
|
62/M
|
DM, HTN, CAD
|
15.7
|
4.48
|
92
|
D
|
> 20
|
BLO
|
1.12/28
|
|
Case 7
|
64/M
|
DM, HTN
|
13.0
|
13.87
|
236
|
N
|
6.2
|
BLO
|
1.48/62
|
|
Case 8a
|
58/M
|
··
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
N
|
4.58
|
N
|
2.4/91
|
|
Case 9
|
62/M
|
CAD
|
11.7
|
6.22
|
217
|
N
|
0.44
|
ULO
|
1.22/35
|
|
Case 10
|
70/M
|
DM, HTN
|
14.6
|
11.2
|
256
|
D
|
NA
|
BLO
|
1.91/57
|
|
Case 11
|
61/M
|
··
|
14.6
|
13.5
|
170
|
N
|
2.64
|
N
|
1.23/42
|
|
Case 12
|
64/M
|
··
|
12.7
|
9.5
|
291
|
NA
|
NA
|
ULO
|
NA
|
|
Case 13
|
60/M
|
HTN
|
13.6
|
8.3
|
275
|
N
|
3.88
|
BLO
|
1.57/73
|
|
Case 14
|
54/M
|
DM
|
13.9
|
13.75
|
284
|
N
|
12.47
|
BLO
|
1.71/72
|
|
Case 15
|
72/F
|
DM, HTN, CAD
|
11.5
|
9.52
|
399
|
N
|
> 20
|
BLO
|
1.59/37
|
|
Case 16
|
65/M
|
RHD, AF
|
13.0
|
5.31
|
74
|
N
|
1.64
|
NA
|
2.8/177
|
|
Case 17
|
43/M
|
DM, ILD
|
13.1
|
3.74
|
119
|
N
|
3.66
|
BLO
|
1.02/18
|
|
Case 18
|
73/M
|
HTN, CAD
|
11.4
|
11.7
|
318
|
N
|
2.45
|
ULO
|
2.17/54
|
|
Case 19
|
63/M
|
HTN
|
11.1
|
14.38
|
323
|
N
|
NA
|
BLO
|
1.54/31
|
|
Case 20
|
63/M
|
··
|
14.1
|
4.13
|
254
|
N
|
9.27
|
ULO
|
0.9/16
|
|
Case 21
|
65/M
|
DM, HTN
|
12
|
13.1
|
258
|
D
|
3.56
|
BLO
|
4.24/135
|
|
Case 22
|
70/F
|
DM
|
12.5
|
7.08
|
201
|
N
|
3.81
|
BLO
|
0.88/18
|
|
Case 23
|
54/M
|
CLPD
|
11
|
96.6
|
263
|
N
|
4.26
|
BLO
|
0.79/20
|
|
Case 24
|
58/F
|
DM, HTN, OSA
|
11.5
|
3.37
|
85
|
D
|
NA
|
BLO
|
4.25/130
|
Pathological Findings
Of the 21 confirmed cases subjected to needle biopsies, lung tissue was sampled in
18 cases, liver tissue in 20 cases, and bone marrow in 20 cases.
Histopathological feature of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was noted in 88.9% (16
of 18) cases. Exudative phase, characterized by interstitial edema, loss of type I
pneumocytes, and deposition of bright eosinophilic hyaline membrane along the alveolar
lining and terminal airways, was identified in 83.3% (15 of 18) cases ([Fig. 1A]). Aggregates of fibrin balls within alveolar spaces, possibly indicating very early
phase of DAD and sometimes described as acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia pattern
of injury co-existed in seven cases ([Fig. 1B]). Organizing phase characterized by presence of loose fibroblastic plug in the alveolar
lumen and early interstitial fibrosis, was identified in 27.7% (5/18) cases ([Fig. 1C]). Pulmonary microthrombi within septal capillaries was seen in 44.4% (8/18) cases
([Fig. 1D]). Other changes of pulmonary parenchyma are summarized in [Table 2]. Further, a correlation of histological findings with duration of clinical course
was sought. However, no temporal association was noted for the exudative and organizing
phase of DAD. We observed organizing phase of DAD as early as 5 days of clinical course
while ongoing exudative phase of DAD on 35 days of clinical course. Additionally,
foci of bronchopneumonia were noted in two cases (case 5 and case 12) and aspirated
material was identified in one case (case 6). On immunohistochemistry, reactive type
II pneumocytes were highlighted by TTF-1 ([Fig. 2A]). Squamous metaplasia, seen in 22.2% (4/18) cases, was highlighted by p63 ([Fig. 2B]). A paucity of interstitial chronic inflammatory cells was noted except in 22.2%
(4/18) cases where mild degree of lymphocytic infiltrate was identified. Immunohistochemistry
revealed presence of T cells ([Fig. 2C]) while there was marked paucity of B cells in the alveolar interstitium. CD3 positive
T cells comprised of predominantly CD8 positive cytotoxic cells with a few CD4 positive
helper T cells. CD68 highlighted macrophages which were mostly located within alveolar
lumina ([Fig. 2D]). D-dimer was available in 13 cases and was elevated in 12 cases. The mean value
of D-dimer was significantly higher in cases showing pulmonary microthrombi (7.59
µg/mL) when compared with the mean value of cases lacking microthrombi (2.36 µg/mL).
Table 2
Detailed histopathological findings in lung parenchyma in COVID-19 infection
|
Duration of clinical course (Days)
|
DAD, EP
|
DAD, OP
|
Multinucleated giant cells
|
Cytopathic effect
|
Microthrombi
|
Alveolar squamous metaplasia
|
Intra-alveolar hemorrhage
|
Type II pneumocyte prominence
|
Septal thickening-fibrosis
|
Septal thickening-inflammation
|
Alveolar macrophages
|
Pulmonary edema
|
Peribronchiolar metaplasia
|
|
Abbreviations: DAD, diffuse alveolar damage; EP, exudative phase; OP, organizing phase.
aAssociated fibrin balls in alveoli (AFOP pattern).
bOrganizing phase +.
|
|
Case 1
|
4
|
2+
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 2
|
5
|
2+
|
2+
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
1
|
|
Case 5
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 6
|
12
|
1+a
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
2+
|
1
|
1
|
|
Case 7
|
12
|
2+a
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 9
|
7
|
1+
|
1+
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1+
|
1
|
1
|
|
Case 10
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 11
|
5
|
1+a
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
2+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 12
|
9
|
1+
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 16
|
10
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
1
|
0
|
|
Case 17
|
10
|
0
|
1+
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1/0
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 18
|
6
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 19
|
5
|
1+a
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
2
|
0
|
|
Case 20
|
17
|
1+
|
2+
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1+
|
1
|
0
|
|
Case 21
|
8
|
2+a
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 22
|
35
|
1+
|
2+
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2+
|
0
|
0
|
|
Case 23
|
13
|
1+a
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2+
|
1
|
0
|
|
Case 24
|
10
|
1+a
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1+
|
0
|
0
|
Fig. 1 Pathological findings in lung caused by COVID-19 infection. (A) Exudative phase of DAD characterized by hyaline membrane along terminal airways.
(B) Aggregates of fibrin forming ball-like structure within alveolar spaces. (C) Loose fibroblastic plugs within alveoli in organizing phase of DAD (Inset Masson
trichrome stain highlighting fibroblastic plug). (D) Microthrombi in small alveolar capillaries (arrow). (A-D, Haematoxylin and Eosin. A-D ×100). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DAD, diffuse alveolar damage.
Fig. 2 Immunohistochemistry. (A) TTF-1 shows type II pneumocyte prominence; (B) p63 highlights squamous metaplasia; (C) CD3 shows the presence of T-cells in the alveolar interstitium. (D) CD68 highlights the intra-alveolar collection of macrophages. (A-B ×100, C-D ×400).
The microscopic findings in the liver are summarized in [Table 3]. The deranged liver function test did not show significant correlation with any
of the histopathological parameters of the liver. (p > 0.05, Chi-square test). Portal tract pathology was subtle and was characterized
by chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate of mild degree (50%, 10 cases) ([Fig. 3A]). Porto-portal fibrosis was noted in 15% (3/20) cases. Features attributed to chronic
venous congestion were noted in 50% (10/20) cases in the form of centrizonal congestion
(10, 50% cases) accompanied by hepatocytic loss (8, 40% cases) ([Fig. 3B]). Macrovesicular steatosis was a dominant finding and was observed in 90% (18/20)
cases. Cholestasis was noted in 45% (9/20) cases; however, it was focal and intracytoplasmic.
Lobular inflammation was observed in 65% (13/20) cases (lymphocytic lobular inflammation,
nine cases and neutrophilic lobular inflammation, four cases) ([Fig. 3C]). The cases with lymphocytic lobular inflammation showed occasional hepatocytic
dropout while those with neutrophils showed focal confluent necrosis. CD68 highlighted
the Kupffer cell hypertrophy in 85% (17/20) cases. Two cases had histological features
suggestive of nonalcoholic/alcoholic steatohepatitis. Bone marrow showed normocellular
(90% cases) to mildly hypercellular (10% cases) marrow spaces. Prominence of histiocytes
with hemophagocytosis was reported in 60% (12/20) cases ([Fig. 3D]).
Table 3
Pathological finding in liver in COVID-19 infection
|
Portal Inflammation
c
|
Centrizonal congestion
|
Centrizonal hepatocytic loss
|
Sinusoidal dilation with neutrophils
|
Macrovesicular steatosis
|
Lobular inflammation
|
Cholestasis
|
Glycogenated nuclei
|
Kupffer cell hypertrophy
|
|
aPresent.
bAbsent.
c1+ indicates mild intensity.
dNeutrophilic lobular inflammation.
eKupffer cell hemophagocytosis.
|
|
Case 1
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
< 10%
|
a,d
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 2
|
1+
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
> 66%
|
a,d
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 5
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 6
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
60–65%
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
|
Case 7
|
1+
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
40–45%
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
|
Case 9
|
1+
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
40–45%
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
b
|
|
Case 10
|
1+
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
< 10%
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 11
|
1+
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
< 10%
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 12
|
1+
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
< 10%
|
a,d
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 13
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
< 10%
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 14
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
< 10%
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
|
Case 16
|
1+
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 17
|
1+
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
10–15%
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
|
Case 18
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
10–15%
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 19
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
35–40%
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
|
Case 20
|
1+
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
40–45%
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
a,e
|
|
Case 21
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
< 10%
|
a
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 22
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
b
|
15–20%
|
b
|
a
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 23
|
b
|
a
|
a
|
a
|
> 90%
|
a,d
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
|
Case 24
|
1+
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
15–20%
|
a
|
b
|
b
|
a
|
Fig. 3 Pathological findings in liver and bone marrow caused by COVID-19 infection. (A) Centrizonal congestion with hepatocyte loss. (B) Centrizonal congestion with hepatocytic loss. (C) Expanded portal tract with mild degree of lymphocytic cells infiltrate. (D) Increased histiocytes with prominent hemophagocytosis in bone marrow. (A-D, Haematoxylin
and Eosin. A-B ×100, C-D ×400). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.
Of the three cases suspected for COVID-19 but negative on molecular testing, two cases
had lung tissue sampled and both cases lacked changes of DAD. Liver, in one case,
had cirrhosis while in remaining two cases lacked portal and lobular changes.
Discussion
Description of pathological findings related to COVID 19 infection has recently begun
to be elucidated.[6]
[7] These findings provide a glimpse of the pathogenic mechanisms involved in severe
COVID-19 infection. In the present study, we report minimally invasive autopsy findings
of lungs, liver, and bone marrow in deceased patients with COVID 19. Our study shows
the major brunt being on the lung, and also provides evidence of significant liver
and bone marrow involvement in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The most significant microscopic finding observed was acute lung injury in the form
of DAD. Similar findings in lung were described during SARS-CoV outbreak of 2002 to
2003 as well as during the current ongoing pandemic of COVID-19.[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15] The first case documenting the histological findings in SARS-CoV-2 infection was
published in February 2020 by Xu et al in biopsies from lung, liver, and heart. The
authors reported bilateral DAD, multinucleated syncytial cells, and cytopathic changes
in pneumocytes.[15] In a recent large series of 21 cases, the prominent finding noted was exudative
(76%) and organizing DAD (38%), followed by microthrombi (45% cases) and pulmonary
lymphoid infiltrates and pulmonary hemorrhage, each noted in 14% cases.[16] The present study showed the presence of T lymphocytes (particularly cytotoxic T
cells) within the alveolar interstitium as the dominant component of inflammatory
cells. It is known that cytotoxic T lymphocytes are helpful to combat acute viral
infections in the pulmonary parenchyma.[17] Barton et al also showed the predominance of cytotoxic T cells in inflammatory infiltrate
within the alveolar intersitium.[14] Menter et al noted pulmonary emboli and vasculitis in 19 and 5% cases, respectively.[16] Additionally, the authors reported superimposed bronchopneumonia in nearly half
of their cases.[16] Another recent study described spectrum of histological changes during disease course,
with early phase characterized by neutrophilic capillaritis and capillary microthrombi
followed by DAD and its subsequent progression to organizing phase.[18] In the current study, exudative as well as organizing phase of DAD was found, often
existing together in 22.2% cases. We could not find any temporal association for the
histological features of lung injury. Instead, organizing phase of DAD was seen as
early as 5 days of hospital stay, indicating a subclinical ongoing lung injury before
symptoms onset. Abnormal CT findings in asymptomatic cases of COVID 19 are in agreement
with this finding.[3]
[19] This fact was also highlighted in the study by Bradley et al, where the authors
reported histological features of organizing phase of DAD as early as 2 days after
symptom onset in a case of fatal COVID-19 infection.[12] Hence, these findings demand strong clinical suspicion for identifying the patients
with ongoing DAD at the time of admission.
In the present study, we found microvascular thrombi in alveolar arterioles in 44.4%
cases. Microthrombi in pulmonary vasculature was demonstrated in several recent studies
and ranges from 35.6 to 80%.[12]
[13]
[14] Presence of microthrombi in significant number of cases in various studies indicated
microvascular injury, an important aspect of COVID-19 pathology. A recent study described
peculiar vascular features, apart from the acute respiratory distress syndrome, in
the form of significant vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and neoangiogenesis.
The author reported widespread presence of these vascular features, seen in SARS-CoV-2
infections, to be distinct from the H1N1 influenza infections.[20] Presence of microthrombi in alveolar capillaries was significantly more prevalent
in cases with COVID-19, when compared with those of H1N1 influenza infections.[20] A few studies highlighted the role of coagulopathy in the possible causation of
widespread thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation.[21]
[22] In one of these studies, the author reported pulmonary thromboembolism as cause
of death in one-third cases and a high frequency (58% cases) of unsuspected DVT.[21] Similarly, Grimes et al described pulmonary emboli as the fatal event in two cases.[22] In the present study, a significantly higher D-dimer level in cases showing pulmonary
microthrombi supports the coagulopathy as a possible cause of thrombosis in pulmonary
vessels. The deranged coagulation system is known to occur in association with many
other viruses such as HIV, Ebola virus, and dengue virus.[23]
[24] Thrombotic events in coronavirus may be triggered by multiple pathogenic mechanisms,
including endothelial injury, systemic inflammation, and a procoagulant state.[21] The histological demonstration of pulmonary microthrombi in the present study supports
an important role of vascular thrombotic events in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 pathology.
The liver pathology seen in the present study points to different pathogenic mechanisms
as described in recent studies.[25]
[26] Centrizonal congestion with hepatocytic loss noted in one-half of cases might be
related to cardiogenic passive venous congestion as terminal events in severely ill
patients, rather than direct insult to liver by viral particles. Significant portal
inflammation and prominent cholestatic features were absent in this study, as reported
in other case series as well.[25]
[26]
[27] Sinusoidal dilatation with influx of neutrophils and Kupffer cell prominence seen
in present study might represent a hyperinflammatory response/shock-related changes.
In this cohort, we found occasional hepatocyte dropout and focal confluent necrosis
which might be related to direct viral insult and/or ischemic changes. It has been
shown that the biliary epithelial cells express ACE2, a receptor for binding the viral
particles, almost comparable to the expression seen in respiratory epithelial cells.[28] However, in the present study, no definitive or suggestive features of bile duct
injury was noted. The same finding was also reported by Sonzogni et al in their cohort
of 48 cases with additional steatosis in more than 50% cases.[29] The present study also documented steatosis in majority of cases with 38.9% cases
showing moderate (> 33%) to severe (> 66%) degree of steatotic changes. Additionally,
a single case, in our study, had prominent hemophagocytosis by Kupffer cell in liver
tissue. Thus, it can be derived that liver pathology in COVID-19 infections are attributed
to multiple pathogenic events, including circulatory disturbances, ischemic changes,
shock-induced changes, and a possible role of direct viral attack. Further, no significant
association of any specific pathological parameters with deranged liver function tests
was documented. Lagana et al, in their 40 patients, also could not found any association
of liver function tests with specific histological changes.[25] Earlier studies have shown that a significant number of cases with hepatitis B virus
infection had considerable histological activity even with normal ALT levels.[30] However, part of lack of this association in the present study might have been attributed
to a small sample size.
A high proportion of cases (60% cases) showed hyperplasia of histiocytes with prominent
hemophagocytosis in bone marrow biopsies. However, no significant pancytopenia was
documented in these cases, contrasting with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. There
is paucity of literature that documents postmortem marrow findings in these patients.
Of the studies published, prominent hemophagocytosis was a common finding.[31]
[32] Abnormal cytotoxic T-cell response, triggered by viral infection, resulting in increased
release of cytokines and overactivation of histiocytes has been postulated for hemophagocytosis.[33] Histological presence of hemophagocytosis is described in many conditions, including
sepsis, chemotherapy administration, after blood transfusions, and major surgeries
and, thus are not very specific for diagnosis of HLH.[34] Goel et al reported that the presence of marrow hemophagocytosis had a sensitivity
of 83% and specificity of only 60%, for the diagnosis of HLH.[35] An isolated finding of marrow hemophagocytosis in COVID-19 infections should not
be considered as evidence of HLH, especially when the supporting clinical presentation
and laboratory parameters for HLH are lacking.
The present study strengthens the view that minimally invasive autopsy is an effective
approach to study the pathobiology of the novel infectious agents, where the extent
of safety precautions required for performing complete autopsy is not adequate or
not known. The procedure can be performed in mortuary rooms lacking laminar air flow
and further has advantages of reduced procedure time, minimal aerosol generations
and reduced costs. In addition, the relatives of the deceased often refuse to get
complete autopsy done, due to their socio-cultural beliefs. In these conditions, the
relatives can be offered the options for minimally invasive autopsy. This may enhance
the opportunity to study the pathology, where the cause of death remains uncertain.
Our study has several limitations. The most important is lack of complete autopsy.
Further, we are not able to comment on the changes of proximal airways, related to
sampling issue. Electron microscopy was not performed in the study. Hence, we are
not able to demonstrate viral particles in the tissues examined.
Conclusion
Incorporation of minimally invasive autopsies provides a safe and effective method
to study the pathological findings in deceased patients with COVID-19. Presence of
pulmonary microthrombi in significant number of cases supports the vascular events,
apart from the characteristic DAD, as an important pathogenic mechanism for lung injury
in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Higher D-dimer values indicate clinical evidence for underlying
microthrombi in circulation. Histopathological findings in liver and bone marrow suggest
indirect insult to these organs, related to circulatory and/or hyperinflammatory response
to viral infections.