PDF icon PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2021; 8(02): 85-86
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1734402
Editorial

Regional Anesthesia Practice in Neurosurgery

Parmod K. Bithal 
1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Girija P. Rath
1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar aufeRefMedOne
 
 als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

Maintenance of cerebral and spinal cord perfusion is the cornerstone for the safety of any neurosurgical procedure, and it depends upon stable hemodynamics.[ 1 ] Fluctuation in blood pressure (BP) in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation may impact cerebral blood flow (CBF), and thus, perioperative morbidity and mortality.[ 2 ] Inadequate analgesia under general anesthesia (GA) is one major factor that causes episodic surges in BP. Anesthesiologists rely primarily on opioids for intraoperative analgesia during neurosurgery. Quick postoperative recovery after craniotomy is critically important and highly desirable. However, the opioids may delay recovery from anesthesia, thereby preventing immediate postoperative neurological assessment. Opioids may also cause respiratory depression with its attendant sequel, as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Local anesthetic infiltration of the scalp for craniotomies, in combination with GA, was first described by Harvey Cushing and George Crile in the early 1900s.[ 1 ] Modern neuroanesthesia with extensive neuromonitoring capabilities and safer anesthetic agents restricted the utility of regional anesthesia (RA) in neurosurgical patients. However, the resurgence of interest in awake craniotomy with expanding neurosurgical indications and awareness of the side effects of opioids has demonstrated that there is still a place for RA in neurosurgery, not only for craniotomy procedures but also for many spinal procedures. RA alone is not only valuable to facilitate safer surgery in some specific groups of neurosurgical procedures, but it is also a key modality of providing postoperative analgesia, thereby neuroanesthesiologists can afford to shun their reliance on opioids. More importantly, RA application has minimal effects on hemodynamics.

Scalp nerve block (SNB) is the principal modality of RA used for awake craniotomy and to provide postoperative analgesia. SNB is easy to achieve and requires knowledge of anatomical landmarks for innervation of the forehead and scalp by various sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve. For successful SNB, bilateral branches of trigeminal nerves should be blocked. However, the posterior scalp is innervated by cranial spinal nerves. SNB provides effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia in adults as well as in small children.[ 3 ] , [ 4 ] SNB also facilitates “transitional analgesia” following remifentanil-based intraoperative analgesia.[ 5 ] SNB largely obviates hemodynamic perturbations from Mayfield clamp application, which are not effectively attenuated by opioid administration under GA.[ 6 ] Scalp block is associated with improved progression-free survival of patients receiving primary glioma resection.[ 7 ]

By reducing the intraoperative opioid requirement, SNB facilitates immediate neurological assessment postoperatively. Ropivacaine having selective action on the sensory Aδ and C fibers (because of rich innervation of the scalp by these nerve fibers) is a favored agent for SNB, in the strength of 0.75%. The effect of adjuvants such as opioids, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and magnesium sulfate has been investigated to improve the quality and duration of the block, showing varying results.

Spine surgery, which constitutes a significant proportion of the neurosurgical population, may be simple (single or two levels of discectomy) or complex (requiring instrumentation). Neuraxial anesthesia is an exciting proposition for single or two levels of discectomy. A review of the literature suggested that both RA and GA are safe and effective techniques for lumbar spine surgery and that RA may prove a better alternative to GA particularly, for patients who are at higher risk of complications of GA.[ 8 ] Epidural anesthesia is also a substitute for spinal anesthesia in simple lumbar spine surgery.[ 9 ] Neuraxial anesthesia is associated with cost reduction to the hospital as well as to the patients, diminished blood loss, lower incidence of hemodynamic fluctuations, reduced need for postoperative analgesia, shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of urinary retention, the fewer incidence of PONV, and lessened incidence of thromboembolism. In addition, patients are mildly sedated during surgery, which allows addressing position-related discomfort. Due to the limited duration of action of spinal anesthesia, this technique must be eschewed in procedures expected to last longer than 3 hours and also when a less experienced neurosurgeon conducts the surgery. The possibility of losing the airway in a prone position with limited choices in useful airway devices and an inability to perform normal airway rescue maneuvers must be taken into account when considering this technique.[ 10 ] Additionally, there is the possibility of intrathecal migration of local anesthetic if dura mater is torn during surgery. The pain of complex lumbar spine surgery can be effectively prevented by erector spinae plane block (ESPB). However, the current evidence is insufficient to support the routine use of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery. High-quality randomized controlled trials are urgently needed.[ 11 ]

The neuraxial block is not restricted only to adult lumbar spine surgery but has been found useful for repairing meningomyelocele.[ 12 ] Neonates born with this neural tube defect usually have hydrocephalus that may make airway management difficult.[ 13 ] Spinal anesthesia ensures patent airway, avoids any direct pressure to the exposed neural placode, decreases postoperative apneic episodes, and attenuates the surgical stress response. Viscomi et al reported successful repair of meningomyelocele in 14 patients.[ 12 ]

Carotid artery stenosis is now being diagnosed frequently due to increasing life expectancy. The American Heart Association guidelines recommend carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis of 50 to 99% if the risk of perioperative stroke or death is less than 6%.[ 14 ] Elderly patients (more than 75 years of age) derive more benefits from this procedure than the younger ones. CEA can be performed either under GA or RA with cervical plexus block (CPB); the CPB is the preferred technique.

The cervical plexus arises from the ventral rami of C1 to C4 nerves, divided into superficial plexus and deep plexus. The deep branches are motor, while the superficial branches are sensory and supply the skin and subcutaneous tissues of the neck and posterior aspect of the head. Location of peripheral nerves with nerve stimulators and ultrasound has refined the technique of CPB.[ 15 ] With CPB, an awake patient can self-monitor the satisfactory CBF throughout cross-clamping of the carotid artery; it provides predictable hemodynamic control and reduces hospital stay. CPB for CEA is particularly useful in healthcare facilities with limited neuromonitoring resources. CPB has also been used in anterior cervical discectomy and fixation (ACDF). However, the GA is superior to CPB in achieving better intraoperative hemodynamic stability and higher patient satisfaction with adequate intraoperative analgesia for patients undergoing ACDF. However, GA entails longer surgical and anesthesia time, may require more postoperative analgesia, and increased cost of anesthesia.[ 16 ]

Possible concerns with CPB in this procedure include remote access to the upper airway, conversion to GA, if needed, is difficult, and the need for patient cooperation. Ultrasound-guided deep CPB may allow a reduction in complications from inadvertent subarachnoid deposition of local anesthetic or injection of the agents into the vertebral artery, and respiratory distress due to the entrapment of the local anesthetic agent in paravertebral space and the direct spread of the anesthetic injection around the cervical nerve plexus.[ 17 ]

Apart from an alternative option to GA in a certain neurosurgical scenario, RA has been employed regularly in neurosurgical practice, in line with the upcoming concept of pre-emptive analgesia and its role in perioperative hemodynamic stability and early postoperative recovery. It should also be borne in mind that acute and chronic postneurosurgical pain has been extensively studied, and RA has a major role in their management. Nonetheless, the nerve blocks are an excellent analgesic option for polytrauma patients managed in the neurointensive care units. Pain is an important factor affecting intracranial pressure (ICP) in such patients, and appropriate analgesia helps control the ICP.

This narrative is a further testament to the fact that RA is an underutilized asset in the armamentarium of neuroanesthesiologists. if employed, in cooperative patients or patients with multiple systemic comorbidities, RA would lead to better patient outcomes with preservation of hospital resources. The use of RA in neurosurgery may be under-reported. We want to emphasize the utility and encourage its widespread use and documentation.


 

Conflict of Interest

None declared.


Address for correspondence

Girija Prasad Rath, MD, DM
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029
India   

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. September 2021

© 2021. Indian Society of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India


  Lizenzen und Reprints