Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a renal replacement therapy with many benefits including
being a home modality leading to a better quality of life and autonomy, continuous
therapy, decreased vascular complications, as well as fewer interruptions in therapy.
The utilization of PD as a renal replacement therapy in the United States is lower
than that around the world. However, after the launch of the Advancing American Kidney
Health Initiative in 2019 which emphasized the role of the home dialysis modality,
many programs are investing more resources into expanding PD programs.
Successful PD is dependent on the interaction of cycles of peritoneal fluid freely
flowing within the peritoneal cavity and thus interacting with the peritoneal membrane
through a reliably functional long-term peritoneal access. The fluid must be able
to instill quickly, dwell for the intended period of time with adequate membrane contact,
and subsequently drain quickly. This must be an efficient process which occurs multiple
times per the patient's prescribed treatment to be successful. Hence, monitoring and
treatment of dialysis-related peritoneal infections, mechanical complications, and
catheter-related infections are crucial factors in catheter survival and successful
PD therapy.[1]
Catheter placement can occur via an open surgical placement, laparoscopic placement,
peritoneoscopic placement, fluoroscopic placement (with or without ultrasound), as
well as blindly. Although there are benefits and challenges to each method utilized,
no specific method has been proven to be more successful generally than any other.[2] Each patient should be evaluated individually, and local resources examined before
deciding which method is preferred.[3] This article will cover complications of percutaneous fluoroscopic placement of
the PD catheter performed by interventionalists in the radiology suite.
Complication Categories
The ultimate goal of PD catheter placement is successful PD treatments. Therefore,
any issue that occurs in which the patient is not able to obtain adequate treatments
is a complication. When related to the catheter itself, these can be categorized into
early perioperative complications, mechanical complications, and infectious complications.
Percutaneous fluoroscopic PD catheter placement is described in detail elsewhere and
is beyond the scope of this article; however, many complications occur due to variations
in placement procedure. Therefore, following a systematic stepwise approach during
PD placement is vital for successful PD programs.
Selecting the insertion method and the catheter type is significant ingredient for
successful functional PD catheters.
Selection of Catheter Type
Catheter type selection is an important component of successful peritoneal therapy
and should be individualized for each patient. As a rule, the best catheter for any
particular patient is the one that can achieve appropriate pelvic placement, a clean
exit site easily visible and accessible to the patient, and one which can be inserted
and implanted through the abdominal wall using the least amount of tubing stress.[2] In general, a double Dacron cuff is preferred, as the deep cuff can be embedded
within the rectus muscle, a merit that provides firm tissue ingrowth and fixation
of the cuff leading to better catheter immobilization[2]
[4] ([Fig. 1]). Additionally, the superficial cuff, which is placed in the subcutaneous tissue
2 to 4 cm from the exit site, serves as an effective barrier to contaminants that
can invade the catheter track.[2] Furthermore, the double-cuff configuration may lower the risk of Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis.[5] An extended two-piece catheter with a second piece that has a two-cuff subcutaneous
extension with a titanium connector can be used to create a remote exit site location
in the upper abdomen, back, or chest. These extended PD catheters are ideal for patients
with multiple skin creases and folds, obesity, intestinal stomas, feeding tubes, fecal
or urinary incontinence, suprapubic catheters, or those who like to take deep tub
baths.[4]
[Fig. 2] shows the normal position of PD catheter.
Fig. 1 Relationship of the peritoneal catheter cuffs to the adjacent structures.
Fig. 2 Proper peritoneal catheter position within the pelvis.
Perioperative Complications
Immediate and early complications are those that occur in the perioperative period.
The most severe and critical of these complications is bowel or bladder perforation
as well as critical hemorrhage usually due to puncture of the inferior epigastric
vessels ([Fig. 3]). Bleeding that is related to the rectus muscle and tissue trauma is occasionally
encountered. Using ultrasound during insertion can mitigate the bleeding complications,
as vessels and bowel loops are visualized and needle entry into the peritoneum is
performed under direct ultrasound guidance. Moreover, fluoroscopy to insert a guidewire
into the deep pelvis and contrast injection to identify the posterior pelvis are also
helpful tools in preventing the injury to intra-abdominal organs and structures.
Fig. 3 Selective arteriogram reveals extravasation from the inferior epigastric artery (arrow,
a) treated with coil embolization (arrow, b).
Visceral injury typically occurs during entry into the abdominal cavity or during
advancement of the catheter into the pelvis. If bowel perforation is considered, it
is crucial to recognize and confirm the diagnosis immediately. This can be done via
visualization of bowel lumen, return of bowel contents from the dialysate effluent,
a hissing sound from gas release, or emanation of foul-smelling gas. Contrast injection
characteristically outlines the mucosal folds of the small or large intestine.[6] If undetected, manifestations postoperatively include severe watery diarrhea, abdominal
pain with hypotension, rigid abdomen, and peritonitis.[2] A through-and-through bowel perforation may temporarily mask some of these manifestations.
This is far more common with the use of trocars and blind insertion methodologies.
Most microperforations can be managed by keeping the patient NPO, giving prophylactic
antibiotics, and close observation.[7] Occasionally, immediate surgical intervention may be required to address this complication.
Bladder perforation is rarely encountered when the percutaneous PD technique is used.
Several signs and tests can help in the diagnosis, such as checking glucose on a urinalysis,
an increase in urine volume, hematuria, bladder distention immediately after instillation
of dialysis fluid, and urinary peritonitis causing ileus. Importantly, this complication
can go unnoticed as some of the holes of the PD catheter may remain outside the bladder;
therefore, other diagnostic tools can be used to confirm the diagnosis including postoperative
cystoscopy, cystogram, and other imaging. Notably, neurogenic bladder with incomplete
emptying may predispose to perforation.[2] Therefore, emptying the bladder and inserting a Foley catheter prior to PD catheter
insertion are important preventive steps.
Hemorrhage of the inferior epigastric vessels may require ligation if noted intraoperatively
or surgical versus angiographic embolization if discovered postoperatively ([Fig. 3]).[2] On the other hand, intra-abdominal trauma may result in mild bleeding that manifests
as blood-stained effluent. This is usually self-limited and requires conservative
management including regular flushes and possible use of intraperitoneal heparin.[2] Bleeding at the exit site may also occur and is usually controlled with manual pressure,
suture placement, injection with epinephrine, and frequent dressing changes.
Post-Insertion Complications
Complications that occur after PD catheter placement can be categorized into mechanical
and infectious, as depicted in [Fig. 4].[5] Mechanical complications can be further grouped into flow dysfunction or pericatheter
leakage issues.
Fig. 4 Classification of PD catheter complications post-insertion.
Mechanical Complications
These complications include issues with flow dysfunction due to extrinsic compression
of the catheter tip, internal luminal obstruction, poor positioning and/or migration,
and tissue attachment and entrapment. On the other hand, peritoneal leakage complications
can also occur with a reported frequency as high as 12.8%. These leakages can broadly
be categorized into pericatheter leaks, abdominal wall hernias, and pleuroperitoneal
connection or fistula development.[2]
Flow dysfunction issues: Flow dysfunction mainly manifests as drain pain that is encountered upon draining
the dialysate. This pain typically results from incomplete evacuation of dialysate
fluid as visceral structures in the pelvis siphon up to the catheter tip causing contact
and irritation against the parietal peritoneum. This phenomenon typically occurs when
the PD catheter is placed too deep in the pelvis, usually seen when the umbilicus
is used as a landmark rather than the pubic symphysis. Subsequently, the PD catheter
may become crowded between the rectum, uterus, and bladder. In most cases, catheter
replacement is required, as neither drainage to gravity nor manipulation would effectively
solve this problem. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance that the operator applies
due diligence preoperatively and during implantation to ensure adequate placement
of the PD catheter with careful attention paid to catheter type according to body
habitus/belt line, incision site, and exit-site location. Flow dysfunction of PD catheter
may arise from extrinsic compression, luminal obstruction, catheter migration, or
catheter entrapment, as detailed in the following paragraphs.
Extrinsic compression of the catheter tip: This dysfunction is commonly caused by constipation and/or bladder distension and
usually manifests as a difficulty with draining the dialysate, incomplete draining,
or drain pain. The distended bladder or colon obstructs the side holes of the catheter,
which, in turn, impairs the drainage process of the dialysate fluid. A simple abdominal
X-ray and checking a post-void residual urine volume are used for diagnosis and treating
the underlying cause usually solves the problem.
Luminal obstruction of the catheter: This complication occurs due to a tube kink or fibrin/blood clot creating a two-way
obstruction that manifests as a difficulty with both instillation and drainage of
the dialysate ([Fig. 5]).[8] Simple methods to dislodge or dissolve debris include irrigation using a syringe
of saline, instilling tissue plasminogen activator to dissolve the luminal clot, or
the use of wires under fluoroscopic guidance through the catheter lumen to dislodge
obstructive debris. If these maneuvers are unsuccessful, the next step would involve
PD catheter exchange to resume the effective PD. A subcutaneous kink in the tubing
system is almost always due to technical errors during insertion that often occurs
in the transmural segment.[4]
Fig. 5 Obstructed peritoneal dialysis catheter with intraluminal debris.
Catheter migration: This complication can occur any time after placement and is usually related to the
catheter shape-memory resiliency forces that occur when a straight catheter is bent
imposing excessive stress on the tubing. Typically, catheter migration occurs with
the tip into a subdiaphragmatic location. A plain radiograph is usually sufficient
for diagnosis as seen in [Fig. 6].[9] Once catheter migration is diagnosed on plain radiograph, repositioning the PD catheter
can be attempted under fluoroscopic guidance. The success rate of catheter repositioning
is usually low, making catheter exchange the next logical step.
Fig. 6 Abdominal radiographs demonstrating catheter tip migration superiorly from the pelvis
to the right upper abdomen (arrow).
Catheter migration can be minimized by ensuring that when the catheter is placed,
the appropriate shape is chosen to follow the catheter's natural course of direction
and that the deep cuff is immobilized in the rectus musculature, preferably with a
purse string suture. Specifically, the tangential insertion of the appropriate catheter
through the rectus muscle at the paramedian site with positioning of the deep cuff
within the musculature is critical. Choosing the correct configuration of the catheter
is important as well. If the incision site (location of the deep cuff) is located
above the belt line, a catheter with a straightened intercuff segment should be chosen
so that the exit site and catheter sit laterally and downward externally without inducing
resiliency forces on the internal portion of the catheter. Packaging can also induce
shape-memory resiliency forces, especially in the coiled configuration. Special attention
should be paid to this when placing the catheter so that the coil is facing the appropriate
direction (typically left for left abdominal wall placement and vice versa).[1]
Tissue attachment and entrapment: This complication can create either one-way flow issues (during drainage) or two-way
flow impairment during both instillation and drainage. The catheter becomes entrapped
due to omental wrapping or ensnaring by adhesions within the peritoneal cavity resulting
in obstruction of the side holes of the catheter ([Fig. 7]).[10] In most cases, catheter entrapment requires a laparoscopic approach in which adhesions
and omental entrapment can be addressed and the PD catheter can be released or exchanged.
Fig. 7 The PD catheter is trapped within the omentum (a) and within the adhesions (b).
PD Catheter Leakage Issues
These complications can occur early or late after PD catheter placement.
Early pericatheter leaks are mostly seen in urgent start PD patients in which PD therapy is initiated immediately
after catheter placement. To mitigate pericatheter leakage, low-volume fills of PD
fluids used in the supine position are advised. Furthermore, avoiding any activity
that increases the abdominal pressure, such as vigorous physical activities and heavy
lifting, in the perioperative period is recommended. Depending on the severity of
the leak, the patient may require switching to hemodialysis until the PD catheter
site is fully healed.[5] Delaying the PD initiation for approximately 2 weeks—known as the peritoneal catheter
“break-in period”—can minimize the risk for pericatheter leak. A dramatic early leak
(within 30 days of catheter insertion by convention) can be seen with purse string
suture failure of the deep cuff or technical error of wound repair during placement[11] ([Fig. 8]). This requires immediate exploration as persistent leakage of fluid is prone to
infection, which may require prophylactic antibiotics. Eventually, persistent leaks
will require catheter replacement. Of special note, in cases of urgent start PD use,
special attention is required to ensure water-tight seals at all incision points including
a tight purse string suture around the deep cuff within the rectus muscle, precise
placement of the superficial cuff, and tight creation of the exit site.
Fig. 8 Diagram showing pericatheter leak.
Late pericatheter leaks are usually seen after 30 days of catheter insertion and encountered with occult
tunnel infections or pericatheter hernia development in the setting of improper placement
of the deep cuff outside the muscle wall or in the midline fascia. Most late PD catheter
leaks require catheter replacement.[11]
Abdominal wall hernias can develop due to increased abdominal pressure during PD treatments. Risk factors
include steroid use and obesity. These hernias may require surgical repair ([Fig. 9]).
Fig. 9 Abdominal wall hernia is evident on exam and confirmed with CT abdomen (arrows).
Hydrothorax is a rare complication that usually occurs on the right side of the chest. It usually
develops as the result of a pleuroperitoneal connection (fistula formation).[12] Consequently, in the presence of this connection, the dialysate fluid moves from
the peritoneum into the pleural space resulting in clinical sequelae. Hydrothorax
requires surgical repair of the fistulous communication between the two cavities within
the diaphragm ([Fig. 10]).[12]
Fig. 10 Massive right pleural effusion shown on chest X-ray and chest CT (arrows).
Infectious Complications
Catheter-related infections are the most common cause for the loss of PD catheters
with subsequent switch to the hemodialysis modality. Infectious complications can
be classified into exit-site infections, superficial cuff extrusion, tunnel infections,
and peritonitis.
Exit-site infections: These infections are typically related to either poor exit site location or poor
exit site care. The diagnosis is usually made on clinical basis through examining
of the visible exit site and performing an ultrasound of the tunneled track to rule
out any track involvement. Management includes obtaining culture and Gram stain of
the drainage fluid and starting empiric antibiotics. If the exit-site infection becomes
chronic (persists or relapses after 2–3 weeks of appropriate care), especially with
S. aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, involvement of the superficial cuff and/or the tunnel needs to be ruled out using
ultrasound and requires timely treatment to prevent infection spread with subsequent
development of peritonitis. As a preventive best practice measure, the exit site should
be created in a lateral and downward position that the patient can easily see and
access to ensure adequate exit-site care and prevent pooling of bacteria, debris,
or fluids.
Superficial cuff extrusion: Hypermobility of the PD catheter may lead to this complication. To prevent catheter
hypermobility, a purse string suture around the deep cuff ensures immobility of the
catheter. Moreover, the placement of the superficial cuff at least 1 to 2 cm internal
to the exit site without excessive manipulation of the tubing is also helpful in preventing
this complication.[4] Interestingly, this complication can be managed conservatively by shaving and removing
the external cuff with a scalpel or avulsing from the tubing with forceps and allowing
the exit site to heal without the need to exchange the catheter ([Fig. 11]).[13] However, purulent drainage related to cuff extrusion mandates wound cultures, empiric
antibiotics initiation, and local exit-site care.
Fig. 11 Cuff extrusion and exit-site infection.
PD catheter tunnel infections: The spread of infection into the catheter tunnel is the culprit for these complications
([Fig. 12]). The management of these infections is largely dependent on the involvement of
the deep cuff. Therefore, the absence of evidence for infection that is usually suspected
by the presence of fluid around the superficial cuff implies that the infection is
mainly related to poor exit-site location. In this case scenario, the catheter can
be salvaged by splicing a new catheter segment to the intercuff section of the indwelling
catheter and tunneling it to an appropriate exit-site location.[4] However, the presence of fluid around the superficial cuff on ultrasound without
the involvement of the deep cuff and without concurrent peritonitis implies catheter
tunnel infection. In experienced centers, these infections can be managed conservatively
by excising the exit-site skin and extending the incision over the subcutaneous track
until the superficial cuff is exposed. The cuff is then shaved, and the catheter immobilized
with the shaved segment external to the wound, leaving the incision open to heal by
secondary intention.[4]
[14] Another strategy to manage tunnel infections is to excise the exit site and skin
overlying the subcutaneous track en bloc with the underlying tissue around the catheter
segment containing the superficial cuff (in theory to avoid contamination of infected
material). The wound is then closed, and subsequently infected tissue removed from
the catheter, the superficial cuff shaved, and the catheter immobilized. However,
in real-life practice, most tunnel infections are treated by removing the old catheter
and inserting a new one using a different site. Finally, once the deep cuff is infected
or the infection reaches the peritoneal cavity causing peritonitis, the treatment
usually consists of a staged removal of the infected catheter, fluid cultures and
antibiotic initiation, and eventually insertion of a new catheter after a period of
peritoneal rest.[4] The ultimate goal is to preserve the peritoneal membrane at all costs.
Fig. 12 Peritoneal catheter tunnel infection.
Catheter-related peritonitis: This complication occurs when the deep cuff is involved in infection and subsequently
the infection spreads to the peritoneal cavity resulting in full blown peritonitis
that manifests as systemic symptoms (fever, chills), abdominal pain, and PD fluid
color changes ([Fig. 13]). Once peritonitis is suspected, peritoneal fluid cultures are obtained and antibiotic
therapy is initiated. The decision of changing the PD catheter is dependent on the
response to antibiotic therapy. Therefore, the infected PD catheter can be exchanged
over a wire if the patient is responding to appropriate treatment. However, in the
absence of response to appropriate treatment, there should be a low threshold for
removing the PD catheter as the next step. The rationale for this approach is always
to save the peritoneum and prevent further scarring. In daily clinical practice, the
lack of improvement after 5 days of antibiotic therapy necessitates immediate catheter
removal. There are certain clinical scenarios of peritonitis in which PD catheter
removal is indicated. These include fungal peritonitis, refractory or relapsing peritonitis,
refractory exit-site/tunnel infections, nonresponse to medical therapy, growth of
multiple enteric organisms, and mycobacterial peritonitis cases.
Fig. 13 Peritoneal fluid color in different clinical scenarios.
Finally, to avoid or prevent both mechanical and infectious complications, the International
Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) recommends that programs utilize the best practice
guidelines and routinely monitor and audit catheter-related complications at least
annually to provide opportunities to improve practices.[4] Specific goals should include catheter patency at 12 months more than 80% for nonlaparoscopic
insertion, exit-site/tunnel infection within 30 days of insertion less than 5%, peritonitis
within 30 days of insertion less than 5%, visceral injury (bladder, bowel) less than
1%, significant hemorrhage requiring transfusion or surgical intervention less than
1%, incidence of pericatheter leaks recorded separately for early PD starts (<14 days)
versus late starts (>14 days).[4]
