Anreize zur Beeinflussung der individuellen Rauchentwöhnung – Ergebnisse eines „Overview of Reviews“ zu Wirksamkeitseffekten

R. Winkler; I. Reinsperger; M. Sprenger; B. Piso

doi:10.1055/s-0042-111038

Suchttherapie, Table of Contents

Suchttherapie 2017; 18(01): 34-43
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-111038

Originalarbeit

Anreize zur Beeinflussung der individuellen Rauchentwöhnung – Ergebnisse eines „Overview of Reviews“ zu Wirksamkeitseffekten

Incentives to Influence Individual Smoking Cessation – Results from an Overview of Reviews about Effectiveness

R. Winkler

¹Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Österreich

,

I. Reinsperger

¹Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Österreich

,

M. Sprenger

²Medizinische Universität Graz, Österreich

,

B. Piso

¹Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment, Wien, Österreich

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Anreize stellen für eine Rauchentwöhnung bzw. Tabakprävention ein spezifisches Angebot dar. Dieser Beitrag verfolgt das Ziel, die Wirksamkeit von Anreizen zu erheben.

Methodik: Die Evidenzdarstellung basiert auf einem „Overview of Reviews“. Eine systematische Literatursuche in 8 Datenbanken und eine Qualitätsbewertung der systematischen Reviews markieren das methodische Vorgehen.

Ergebnisse: 17 systematische Reviews erfüllten die Einschlusskriterien. Materielle Anreize zeigen sich in der Rauchentwöhnung (insbesondere für Schwangere und Frauen post partum) wirksam, jedoch kommt es zu einer Abflachung der Effekte nach einem Aussetzen der Anreize. Für die Gruppe der Kinder und Jugendlichen zeigen sich keine eindeutigen Präventionseffekte durch Anreize.

Schlussfolgerungen: Eine effektive Entwöhnung des Tabakkonsums bedarf einer verschränkten Vorgehensweise, die Anreize für Individuen mit präventiven Maßnahmen auf der Policy-Ebene verknüpft.

Abstract

Aims: Incentives represent a specific intervention to support smoking cessation and prevention. This paper aims at assessing the effectiveness of incentives.

Methods: The evidence is based on an overview of reviews. The methodological approach involved a systematic literature search in 8 databases and a quality assessment of the systematic reviews.

Results: 17 systematic reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Incentives have positive effects on smoking cessation (particularly for pregnant women and women post partum), effects decreased once incentives were suspended, though. There is no evidence that incentives have a preventive effect on children and adolescents.

Conclusions: Effective smoking restriction necessitates concerted actions combining incentives for individuals and preventive measures on the policy-level.

Schlüsselwörter

Anreize - Rauchen - Gesundheitsverhalten - Nikotinabstinenz - Overview of Reviews

Key words

incentives - smoking - health behaviour - nicotine abstinence - overview of reviews

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Klemperer D, von Hirschhausen E. Sozialmedizin – Public Health – Gesundheitswissenschaften. Lehrbuch für Gesundheitswissenschaften und Sozialberufe. 3. überarb. Aufl. Bern: Hogrefe; 2015
2 Frazer K, Callinan Joanne E, McHugh J et al. Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2016; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3 CD005992
3 Chamberlain C, O’Mara-Eves A, Oliver S et al. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub4 CD001055
4 Spahni KH. Anreizsysteme in Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Verhaltenssteuerung durch Belohnungen: Hochschule Luzern – Soziale Arbeit. 2013
5 Fischer F. Ökonomische Anreize als Instrumente der Präventionspolitik. Präv Gesundheitsf 2013; 8: 112-116
6 Becker LA, Oxman AD. Overviews of Reviews. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd;; 2008: 607-631
7 Oxman A, Guyatt G. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1271-1278
8 Kavanagh J, Oakley A, Harden A et al. Are incentive schemes effective in changing young people’s behaviour? A systematic review. Health Education Journal 2010; 70: 192-205
9 EPPI-Centre; Social Science Research Unit; UCL Institute of Education. Kavanagh J, Trouton A et al. A systematic review of the evidence for incentive schemes to encourage positive health and other social behaviours in young people. 2006 Im Internet: https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Soskzt1sFZs%3D&tabid=671&mid=1562 Zugriff: 27.01.2016
10 Giles EL, Robalino S, McColl E et al. The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e90347
11 Mantzari E, Vogt F, Shemilt I et al. Personal financial incentives for changing habitual health-related behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive medicine 2015; 75: 75-85
12 Bryant J, Bonevski B, Paul C et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions in selected disadvantaged groups. Addiction 2011; 106: 1568-1585
13 Cahill K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R. Incentives for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015; DOI: http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub5 CD004307
14 Cahill K, Lancaster T. Workplace interventions for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014; DOI: http://dx. doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003440.pub4 CD003440
15 Cahill K, Perera R. Quit and Win contests for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2008; DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD004986.pub3 CD004986
16 Johnston V, Liberato S, Thomas D. Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008645. pub2 CD008645
17 Leeks KD, Hopkins DP, Soler RE et al. Worksite-based incentives and competitions to reduce tobacco use. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38: 263-274
18 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Likis FE, Andrews JC et al. Smoking cessation interventions in pregnancy and postpartum care. Im Internet http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190501/pdf/TOC.pdf Zugriff: 27.01.2016
19 Morgan H, Hoddinott P, Thomson G et al. Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIBS): a mixed-methods study to inform trial design. Health Technol Assess 2015; 19: 1-522 vii–viii
20 Reda AA, Kotz D, Evers SMAA et al. Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004305.pub4 CD004305
21 Su A, Buttenheim AM. Maintenance of smoking cessation in the postpartum period: which interventions work best in the long-term?. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18: 714-728
22 Tsoi D, Porwal T, Webster M et al. Interventions for smoking cessation and reduction in individuals with schizophrenia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013; DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD007253.pub3
23 Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA et al. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006; 101: 192-203
24 Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J et al. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006; 101: 1546-1560
25 Mozaffarian D, Afshin A, Benowitz NL et al. Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity, and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 126: 1514-1563