Addressing bias in polyp size measurement

Cesare Hassan; Allesandro Repici; Douglas K. Rex

doi:10.1055/s-0042-112580

Endoscopy, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Endoscopy 2016; 48(10): 881-883
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-112580

Editorial

Addressing bias in polyp size measurement

Autoren

Cesare Hassan

¹Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
Allesandro Repici

²Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
Douglas K. Rex

³Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Abstract

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Corley D, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-1306
2 Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803
3 Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541
4 Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ et al. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 515-520
5 Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 856-861
6 Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy – results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80 e71
7 Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 264-271
8 Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N et al. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1335-1343
9 Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
10 Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-851
11 Saini SD, Nayak RS, Kuhn L et al. Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 554-558
12 Anderson BW, Smyrk TC, Anderson KS et al. Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 201-208
13 Rex DK, Rabinovitz R. Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 402-407
14 Plumb A, Nickerson C, Wooldrage K et al. Terminal digit preference biases polyp size measurements at endoscopy, computed tomographic colonography, and histopathology. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 899-908
15 Burnier M, Gasser UE. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods. Blood Press 2008; 17: 104-109
16 Edouard L, Senthilselvan A. Observer error and birthweight: digit preference in recording. Public Health 1997; 111: 77-79
17 Rex DK, Hewett DG, Raghavendra M et al. The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2312-2317
18 Hyun YS, Han DS, Bae JH et al. Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 391-394
19 Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH et al. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 3220-3226
20 Kaz AM, Anwar A, O’Neill DR et al. Use of a novel polyp “ruler snare” improves estimation of colon polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 812-816
21 Leng Q, Jin HY. Measurement system that improves the accuracy of polyp size determined at colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 2178-2182