Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2016; 48(04): 278-280
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-121580
Leser fragen – Expertem antworten
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Leser fragen – Expertem antworten, Kann man Zähne kieferorthopädisch durch Knochenersatzmaterialien bewegen?

Is it Possible to Move Teeth Orthodontically by Bone Graft Substitutes
C. Reichert
1   Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 January 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Frage

Kann man Zähne kieferorthopädisch durch Knochenersatzmaterialien bewegen?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Reichert C, Götz W, Smeets R et al. The impact of non-autogenous bone graft on orthodontic treatment. Quintessence Int 2010; 41: 665-672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Linton JL, Sohn BW, Yook JI et al. Effects of calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft materials on permanent teeth eruption in beagles. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 197-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schneider B, Diedrich P.. Interaktion von kieferorthopädischer Zahnbewegung und Hydroxylapatit-Keramik. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1989; 44: 282-285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hossain MZ, Kyomen S, Tanne K.. Biologic responses of autogenous bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics transplanted into bone defects to orthodontic forces. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996; 33: 277-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kawamoto T, Motohashi N, Kitamura A et al. A histological study on experimental tooth movement into bone induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in beagle dogs. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 439-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kawamoto T, Motohashi N, Kitamura A et al. Experimental tooth movement into bone induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40: 538-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Feinberg SE, Vitt M.. Effect of calcium phosphate ceramic implants on tooth eruption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 46: 124-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Feinberg SE, Weisbrode SE, Heintschel G.. Radiographic and histological analysis of tooth eruption through calcium phosphate ceramics in the cat. Arch Oral Biol 1989; 34: 975-984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Holtgrave EA.. Inhibition of tooth eruption through calcium-phosphate ceramic granules in the rat. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 47: 1043-1047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials – from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40: 706-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reichert C, Wenghoefer M, Götz W et al. Pilot study on orthodontic space closure after guided bone regeneration. J Orofac Orthop 2011; 72: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Reichert C, Kutschera E, Wenghoefer M et al. Ridge preservation with synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite reduces the severity of gingival invaginations – a prospective clinical study. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 74: 7-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reichert C.. Einbindung eines nanopartikulären Knochenersatzmaterials in die kieferorthopädische Therapie – in vivo- und in vitro-Untersuchungen [Habilitationsschrift]. Bonn, Deutschland: Medizinische Fakultät Universität Bonn; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Reichert C, Götz W, Reimann S et al. Resorption behavior of a nanostructured bone substitute: in vitro investigation and clinical application. J Orofac Orthop 2013; 74: 165-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Konermann A, Staubwasser M, Dirk C et al. Bone substitute material composition and morphology differentially modulate calcium and phosphate release through osteoclast-like cells. Int J Oral & Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43: 514-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Götz W, Gerber T, Michel B et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel (NanoBone(r)) osteogenesis: a study on biopsies from human jaws. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1016-1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Punke C, Zehlicke T, Just T et al. Matrix change of bone grafting substitute after implantation into guinea pig bulla. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2012; 71: 109-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Reichert C, Kutschera E, Nienkemper M et al. Influence of time after extraction on the development of gingival invagination: Study protocol for a multicenter pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials 2013; 14: 10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Reichert C, Kutschera E, Plötz C et al. Inzidenz und Ausprägung von Gingivaduplikaturen bei frühem vs. spätem Beginn des kieferorthopädischen Extraktionslückenschlusses – Eine randomisierte kontrollierte klinische Pilotstudie. under review
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE et al. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Perio Rest Dent 2001; 21: 9-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liem AM, Hoogeveen EJ, Jansma J et al. Surgically facilitated experimental movement of teeth: systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53: 491-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ogihara S, Tarnow DP.. Efficacy of forced eruption/enamel matrix derivative with freeze-dried bone allograft or with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in infrabony defects: A randomized trial. Quintessence Int 2015; 46: 481-490
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Weijs WL, Siebers TJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM et al. Early secondary closure of alveolar clefts with mandibular symphyseal bone grafts and beta-tri calcium phosphate (beta-TCP). Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39: 424-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reichert C, Götz W, Denzel U et al. Hemmung der kieferorthopädischen Zahnbewegung durch Knochenersatzmaterial?. Kieferorthopädie 2013; 27: 345-347
    PubMedGoogle Scholar