Keywords
true posterior communicating artery aneurysm - surgical approach - subtemporal approach
- premammillary artery
Introduction
True posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms are defined as aneurysms that
arise from the PCoA itself and are attached to neither the internal carotid artery
(ICA) nor the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and constitute 1.3% of all intracranial
aneurysms.[1] Although true PCoA aneurysms have been reported to be located close to the ICA,
at the middle part of the PCoA, or close to the PCA, the best surgical approach for
the treatment of true PCoA aneurysms in each location remains unclear. Here, we report
the case of an aneurysm arising from the middle portion of the PCoA, which was successfully
clipped via the subtemporal approach. We also review reported surgical approaches
for true PCoA aneurysms and discuss the optimal treatment for these lesions.
Case Description
A 34-year-old woman without cardiovascular risk factors presented with a sudden onset
of headache and vomiting and was admitted to our hospital as an emergency. Brain computed
tomography (CT) showed a diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Although initial CT
angiography could not detect a bleeding source, repeat digital subtraction angiography
(DSA) revealed an aneurysm in the middle portion of the right fetal-type PCoA ([Figs. 1A, B]). Some perforator branches appeared to originate from the posterior aspect of the
aneurysm ([Fig. 1C]). On the 20th day after onset, she underwent surgery via the right subtemporal approach.
The dome of the aneurysm projected superiorly. The premammillary artery (PMA) arose
very close to the neck of the aneurysm and ran superiorly, adhering to the dome of
the aneurysm ([Fig. 2A]), but no perforators originated from the posterior aspect of the dome. As it was
difficult to thoroughly dissect the PMA from the aneurysm, the PMA was partially dissected
from the aneurysmal neck to obtain a space for the blades of a clip, and a 7-mm bayonet
clip was applied ([Fig. 2B]). The patency of the PCoA and the PMA was confirmed by indocyanine green angiography.
A postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed no perforator infarction
or temporal lobe contusion. Angiography demonstrated complete obliteration of the
aneurysm and preservation of the PCoA ([Fig. 3]). The patient was discharged from hospital without any neurological deficit.
Fig. 1 Right carotid angiogram on the second day (A) and 14th day (B) after onset, and a high-magnification image of the aneurysm (C). Repeat angiography disclosed an aneurysm (arrow) in the middle portion of the posterior communicating artery. Some perforator branches
(arrowheads) appeared to originate from the posterior aspect of the aneurysm.
Fig. 2 Intraoperative photographs before (A) and after (B) clipping. Abbreviations: CN III, oculomotor nerve, PCoA, posterior communicating
artery, PMA, premammillary artery.
Fig. 3 Postoperative right carotid angiogram demonstrating complete clipping of the aneurysm
and preservation of the posterior communicating artery.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a literature review using PubMed, searching for cases of true PCoA aneurysm
treated by direct surgery up to July 2021, using the search term “true posterior communicating
artery aneurysm.” References cited by the retrieved articles were also thoroughly
reviewed. Selection criteria were as follows: (1) available clinical information of
the patient and angiographic findings of the aneurysm; (2) articles providing information
on surgical approach and complications; and (3) articles written in English and Japanese.
Aneurysms associated with tumors or vascular malformations were excluded because the
selection of surgical approach may have been affected by these concomitant lesions.
Data extracted from these articles included patient age, patient gender, rupture status
of the aneurysm, presence of fetal-type PCoA, location and projecting direction of
the aneurysm, surgical approach, and surgical complications. Of the 439 articles found,
40 were finally considered eligible for our study ([Fig. 4]).
Fig. 4 PRISMA flow diagram.
Results
Including our own, we found 46 patients with 47 true PCoA aneurysms treated by direct
surgery ([Table 1]).[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41] Thirty-nine patients (85%) presented with SAH. Thirty-four aneurysms arose on the
fetal-type PCoA and 5 arose from a dilated PCoA, which supplies the principal collateral
flow associated with the occlusion of major vessels. Twenty-nine aneurysms originated
from the proximal portion, 10 from the middle portion, and 6 from the distal portion;
there were two giant aneurysms ([Table 2]). True PCoA aneurysms had a variety of projecting directions ([Fig. 5]). Six aneurysms were fusiform with circumferential dilatation. Surgical approaches
for these lesions were as follows ([Fig. 6]). The ipsilateral pterional approach was used for 37 true PCoA aneurysms (27 in
the proximal portion, 8 in the middle portion, and 2 in the distal portion of PCoA).
Among these, 29 were approached via the retrocarotid route and 8 via the opticocarotid
route. The anterior temporal approach was used for two distal-portion aneurysms and
one giant aneurysm. The anterior subtemporal approach was used for one distal-portion
aneurysm. The subtemporal approach was used for two middle-portion aneurysms and one
giant aneurysm. The contralateral pterional approach was used for two proximal-portion
aneurysms and one distal-portion aneurysm. Neck clipping was performed for 38 aneurysms,
trapping for 7 aneurysms, proximal clipping for 1 aneurysm, and neck clipping and
accidental proximal ligation for 1 aneurysm. With respect to procedure-related complications,
oculomotor nerve (CN III) palsy occurred in six patients, cerebral infarction (including
emotional incontinence) in five, and rerupture of the aneurysm in one.
Fig. 5 Direction of true posterior communicating artery aneurysms. The dome of the aneurysm
has a variety of projecting directions.
Fig. 6 Schematic representation of microsurgical approaches for true posterior communicating
artery aneurysms. Selected approaches include 37 pterional (29 retrocarotid, 8 opticocarotid),
3 anterior temporal, 1 anterior subtemporal, 3 subtemporal, and 3 contralateral pterional
approaches. Abbreviations: CN III, oculomotor nerve; ICA, internal carotid artery;
OC, optic chiasm; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; PCoA, posterior communicating artery;
PMA, premammillary artery.
Table 1
Summary of reported cases of true posterior communicating artery aneurysms treated
by direct surgery
|
Author, year
|
Age/
Sex
|
Presentation
|
Fetal PCoA
|
Location
|
Dome projection
|
Surgical approach
|
Treatment
|
Procedure-related complications
|
|
Yoshida et al,[2]
1979
|
46/M
|
SAH
|
–
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Kamiyama et al,[3]
1980
|
28/F
|
SAH
|
–
|
M
|
Inferior
|
Subtemporal
|
Trapping
|
Emotional incontinence
|
|
Abiko et al,[4]
1981
|
57/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
D
|
Fusiform
|
Pterional
|
Trapping
|
Internal capsule infarction
CN III palsy
|
|
Tanizaki et al,[5]
1982
|
69/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
Transient CN III palsy
|
|
Miyazawa et al,[6]
1983
|
68/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
M
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Masuda et al,[7]
1984
|
45/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Waga et al,[8]
1984
|
54/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Waga et al,[8]
1984
|
64/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Takeda et al,[9]
1985
|
73/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
M
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Okada et al,[10]
1988
|
40/F
|
SAH
|
–
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Kudo et al,[11]
1990
|
57/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
CN III palsy
|
|
Akimura et al,[12]
1991
|
45/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
M
|
Superolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Mandai et al,[13]
1992
|
42/F
|
SAH
|
–
|
D
|
Fusiform
|
Pterional
|
Trapping
|
Occipital infarction
|
|
Takahashi et al,[14] 1992
|
27/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
M
|
Lateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Takahashi et al,[14]
1992
|
23/M
|
Traumatic
|
–
|
M
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Hayashi et al,[15]
1993
|
51/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Koga et al,[16]
1994
|
65/F
|
Unruptured
|
+
|
P
|
Inferior
|
Contralateral
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Ogasawara et al,[17]
1995
|
58/F
|
SAH
|
Dilated
|
D
|
Inferior
|
Contralateral
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Timothy et al,[18]
1995
|
72/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Fusiform
|
Pterional
|
Proximal clipping
|
Rerupture
|
|
Matsumoto et al,[19]
1997
|
27/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
Giant
|
Inferior
|
Subtemporal
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Matsumoto et al,[20]
1997
|
62/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Fusiform
|
Pterional
|
Trapping
|
No
|
|
Abe et al,[21]
2000
|
45/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Okuchi et al,[22]
2000
|
66/M
|
SAH
|
Dilated
|
P
|
Inferomedial
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Muneda et al,[23]
2001
|
51/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Lateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Kaspera et al,[24]
2002
|
63/M
|
SAH
|
Dilated
|
M
|
Superomedial
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Cho et al,[25]
2003
|
57/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
Thalamic infarction
CN III palsy
|
|
Matsumori et al,[26]
2003
|
72/F
|
Unruptured
|
+
|
P
|
Inferior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Nakazaki et al,[27]
2004
|
51/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superomedial
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Sorimachi et al,[28]
2004
|
55/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
CN III palsy
|
|
Nakatsuka et al,[29]
2007
|
32/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
M
|
Fusiform
|
Pterional
|
Trapping
|
No
|
|
Ishikawa et al,[30]
2010
|
83/F
|
Unruptured
Unruptured
|
+
|
P
P
|
Superior
Lateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Nakano et al,[31]
2011
|
43/M
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Nakano et al,[31]
2011
|
71/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Vuignier et al,[32]
2011
|
82/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superomedial
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Abe et al,[33]
2012
|
73/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Abe et al,[33]
2012
|
61/F
|
Unruptured
|
+
|
P
|
Superior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Nagatani et al,[34]
2013
|
59/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferolateral
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Guo et al,[35]
2014
|
46/M
|
SAH
|
–
|
M
|
Fusiform
|
Pterional
|
Trapping
|
No
|
|
Takeda et al,[36]
2015
|
83/M
|
SAH
|
Dilated
|
D
|
Superomedial
|
ATA
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Nery et al,[37]
2016
|
51/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Superior
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
Transient CN III palsy
|
|
Nery et al,[37]
2016
|
53/F
|
Unruptured
|
+
|
P
|
Inferior
|
Contralateral
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Mochizuki et al,[38]
2017
|
85/M
|
Mass effect
|
–
|
Giant
|
Superior
|
ATA
|
Trapping
|
No
|
|
Yokoya et al,[39]
2017
|
65/M
|
SAH
|
Dilated
|
D
|
Superomedial
|
ATA
|
Clipping and
proximal ligation
|
Multiple infarction
|
|
Aso et al,[40]
2019
|
41/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
P
|
Inferomedial
|
Pterional
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Yang et al,[41]
2019
|
63/F
|
SAH
|
–
|
D
|
Superior
|
ASA
|
Clipping
|
No
|
|
Present case
|
34/F
|
SAH
|
+
|
M
|
Superior
|
Subtemporal
|
Clipping
|
No
|
Abbreviations: ASA, anterior subtemporal approach; ATA, anterior temporal approach;
CN III, oculomotor nerve; D, distal; M, middle; P, proximal; PCoA, posterior communicating
artery; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Table 2
Surgical approach according to location of the aneurysm
|
Approach
|
Location of the aneurysm
|
Total
|
|
Proximal
|
Middle
|
Distal
|
Giant
|
|
Pterional
|
27
|
8
|
2
|
0
|
37
|
|
Anterior temporal
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|
Anterior subtemporal
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Subtemporal
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
|
Contralateral pterional
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
|
Total
|
29
|
10
|
6
|
2
|
47
|
Discussion
In this study, 85% of patients presented with SAH and 72% of aneurysms arose on the
fetal-type PCoA. He et al suggested that true PCoA aneurysms have a larger PCoA relative
to the ipsilateral P1 segment of the PCA and are more prone to rupture than ICA–PCoA
aneurysms.[42] Moreover, true PCoA aneurysms have been located near the curvature of fetal PCoA
or dilated PCoA supplying collateral flow.[15]
[22]
[36] These findings indicate that hemodynamic stress may play an important role in the
development and rupture of true PCoA aneurysms.
Several authors have reported that true PCoA aneurysms project inferiorly or laterally,
unrelated to the branching site of the perforating arteries, and that they could be
clipped with relative ease.[8]
[14]
[23] However, our results indicate that true PCoA aneurysms have a variety of projecting
directions.
An average of eight (range, 4–14) perforating branches arise from the PCoA, mostly
from the superior and lateral surfaces, and course superiorly to supply critical structures
including the thalamus, hypothalamus, optic tract, and internal capsule. The PMA is
the largest branch of the PCoA and originates on the middle third of the PCoA.[43] Therefore, the superiorly projecting aneurysms in the middle portion of the PCoA
may carry a risk of ischemic surgical complications. In addition, CN III usually runs
below and lateral to the PCoA, meaning that inferolaterally projecting aneurysms may
bear a risk of CN III injury. In this study, we could not clarify the relationship
between the aneurysmal location/direction and surgical complications. Further studies
of large series are needed to elucidate the risk factors for surgical complications.
We now review several reported surgical approaches for the treatment of PCoA aneurysms.
Pterional Approach
True PCoA aneurysms typically arise at 2 to 3 mm distal to the junction of the ICA
with the PCoA; therefore, most of the aneurysms can be clipped using a standard pterional
approach. In most cases, the PCoA should be followed posteriorly through the retrocarotid
space to visualize the aneurysm neck.[44] When it is difficult to achieve a satisfactory visual angle through the standard
pterional approach, additional techniques are necessary to acquire a wider surgical
space. Two medially projecting aneurysms in the proximal portion of the PCoA were
successfully clipped after widening the opticocarotid space.[22]
[32] After the removal of the anterior clinoid process and opening of the optic canal,
the carotid dural ring was incised for mobilization of the ICA and optic nerve, which
allowed acquirement of a wider opticocarotid space. Given that the surgical corridor
of the contralateral pterional approach is deep and narrow, its application has been
limited to cases of unruptured lesions associated with a contralateral ruptured aneurysm
or cases in which for some reason the surgeon is unable to perform ipsilateral craniotomy.[16]
[17]
[37]
Subtemporal Approach
Matsumoto et al successfully clipped a giant true PCoA aneurysm by reconstructing
the PCoA and proximal PCA via the subtemporal approach,[19] demonstrating that this technique allows for good visualization of the distal portion
of the PCoA; however, it poses the risk of temporal lobe contusion and venous injury
resulting from excessive brain retraction. If the aneurysmal neck is located higher
than usual, it is difficult to access the aneurysm. We selected a subtemporal approach
for the present case to obtain the best view of the posterior aspect of the aneurysm
from where some perforators appeared to arise on the preoperative DSA. In addition,
there were no bridging veins in the temporal base and the aneurysmal neck was 2 mm
above the interclinoid line, circumstances which we considered suitable for this approach.
To avoid temporal contusion, we inserted a lumbar drain to achieve adequate brain
relaxation, and the temporal lobe was carefully retracted to expose the free margin
of the tentorium in stepwise manner from the posterior part of the temporal lobe because
the temporal lobe extends deeply into the middle cranial fossa anteriorly.
Anterior Subtemporal Approach
Horiuchi et al described the anterior subtemporal approach for posteriorly projecting
ICA-PCoA aneurysms,[45] and Yang et al applied this approach to a true PCoA aneurysm in the distal portion.[41] After frontotemporal craniotomy and zygomatic osteotomy, the temporal lobe was elevated
without opening the Sylvian fissure. In this approach, the aneurysm can be observed
from the more lateral side in comparison with the pterional approach. However, using
this method the aneurysms are occasionally hidden under the tentorial edge because
of an upward viewing angle from the anterior temporal base. In such a situation, the
tentorial edge should be incised to obtain good visualization of the aneurysm, which
may increase the risk of CN III injury. Moreover, the temporal tip bridging veins
should be sacrificed to retract the temporal lobe posteriorly, which may create a
risk of venous infarction.
Anterior Temporal Approach
This approach enables posterior retraction of the temporal lobe by dissection of the
superficial Sylvian vein and the anterior temporal artery from the temporal lobe,
and provides the middle surgical corridor of the pterional approach and subtemporal
approach.[46] A wider retrocarotid space obtained with this approach provides better visualization
of true PCoA aneurysms, particularly in the middle and distal portions. Additional
orbitozygomatic osteotomy may allow clipping of high-position true PCoA aneurysms
situated higher than 10 mm from the interclinoid line.[47] We considered this approach unsuitable for our case because the superficial Sylvian
vein was short and emptied into the sphenoparietal sinus lateral to the superior orbital
fissure, which might have restricted posterior retraction of the temporal lobe. In
such a situation, a useful alternative may be the extradural temporopolar approach,[48] whereby the meningo-orbital band is incised and the dura propria of the temporal
lobe is peeled from the superior orbital fissure to the lateral wall of the cavernous
sinus, after which the temporal lobe is retracted posteriorly with the dura mater.
Great care must be taken not to injure the sphenoparietal sinus while peeling the
dura propria.
Endovascular Treatment
Detailed information on patients with true PCoA aneurysms treated by endovascular
means is limited. Recently, Wang et al reported 43 true PCoA aneurysms treated endovascularly.[49] In their study, 41 aneurysms originated from the proximal portion, 1 from the middle
portion, and 1 from the distal portion. All aneurysms were successfully treated without
complications; however, the recurrence rate was higher than usual. The acute angle
of PCoA origin from the ICA and the thinness of PCoA as a parent artery may be a disadvantage
of this approach, hindering the appropriate stability of the microcatheter and the
use of adjunctive techniques, thus making it difficult to achieve dense packing.[50] There are a few reports on endovascular treatment for aneurysms in the middle and
distal portions of the PCoA, and the safety and efficacy of the treatment of such
lesions remains unclear.
Limitations
The major limitations of this research are the small number of participants and the
absence of evidence stronger than level IV. The choice of surgical approach may depend
not only on the aneurysm's characteristics but also on other factors such as brain
edema, venous drainage patterns, and deviation of the ICA. None of these factors were
evaluated in this study. Nonetheless, this review provides the most recent and largest
overview of microsurgical approaches to the management of true PCoA aneurysms.
Conclusion
True PCoA aneurysms most commonly originate from the proximal portion of the PCoA,
followed by the middle portion, then the distal portion, in a variety of projecting
directions. Most true PCoA aneurysms can be treated by the pterional approach; however,
others such as the anterior temporal approach and subtemporal approach can be applicable
for aneurysms in the middle and distal portions of the PCoA or giant aneurysms. Surgeons
should select an appropriate approach for each aneurysm while considering the advantages
and disadvantages of each technique.