Keywords
anchor reinsertion - FDP and FDS avulsion - FDP avulsion - Leddy and Packer classification
Introduction
Closed tendon avulsion is a well-documented injury in hand surgery literature.[1]
[2] Avulsion of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), also called “jersey finger” is
classically caused by forced hyperextension against a fully flexed finger. It is seen
commonly in contact sports, mainly in the context of a player grasping his opponents'
shirt with the tip of his finger, while the opponent is running away.
However, closed avulsion of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon associated
with an avulsion of the FDP tendon is a rare occurrence without preexisting pathology.
It can occur at the insertions or at the midsubstance of the tendons. Only 14 cases
in 12 hands of closed ruptures of both FDS and FDP tendons from their insertions have
been reported since the first series in 1960.[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10] A further six cases have been reported of rupture in the midsubstance of both tendons.[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
We encountered an unusual case of closed avulsion of both flexor tendons of the ring
finger with rupture of the FDP and FDS tendons, both from their respective sites of
insertion. This is the most recent reported combination of this rare presentation.
We will present our case, review the literature, and present our treatment strategy.
Case Report
A right hand dominant 27-year-old male, with no past medical history and no regular
medications presented to the emergency department immediately after a Gaelic Athletic
Association Hurling match with no ability to flex the ring finger of his left hand.
Hurling is a sport of Irish origin in which players hit a small ball with wooden sticks
and is a contact sport that involves tackling. This player had been involved in an
altercation during the game and reported catching his left ring finger in his opponent's
jersey during the incident. He reported immediately feeling pain and subsequent swelling
within a few minutes of the incident.
On examination, he had a swollen and tender ring finger which was held in extension
at rest with an abnormal cascade. Isolating both the FDS and FDP, he could actively
flex neither the distal nor proximal interphalangeal joint; however, normal passive
range of motion was preserved. Additionally, he had a palpable mass just proximal
to the level of the A1 pulley, suggesting the presence of one or both flexor tendons
in zone III. There was no bony injury seen on radiographs of his hand. His clinical
presentation and radiographs can be seen in [Fig. 1].
Fig. 1 (A, B) Clinical presentation. (C, D) X-ray images at presentation with no bone avulsion injury. (E) US images showing a reported 2.49-cm gap in the FDP tendon. FDP, flexor digitorum
profundus; US, ultrasound.
Clinical judgement led us to believe that there was an FDP avulsion, associated with
a possible FDS rupture. Given the rarity of this presentation, an ultrasound scan
was performed. This reported an FDP avulsion that had retracted 2.5-cm proximal to
the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) but suggested that the FDS tendon was still intact.
Surgical exploration with Bruner's incisions, as shown in [Fig. 2], was performed the following day, demonstrating an avulsion of both the FDP and
FDS tendons from their points of insertion. No previous trauma or other pathology
could explain this double rupture. We also noted a rupture of the A4 pulley with both
volar plates being intact.
Fig. 2 (A) Tendons retrieved proximally. (B) FDS repaired at insertion, as indicated by the forceps. This FDP is turned backward
and overlies the A2 pulley to show the insertion of the FDS tendon. (C) Both FDS and FDP tendons repaired before skin closure. FDP, flexor digitorum profundus;
FDS, flexor digitorum superficialis.
Both tendons were retrieved from the palm with a pediatric nasogastric tube and 3–0
Prolene, to preserve the remaining pulley system. The two FDS tendon slips were reattached
to their sites of insertion in the middle phalanx using two micro-Mitek suture anchors
(DePuy Synthes) with a modified Kessler suture. The FDP tendon was replaced to its
anatomical position through the chiasm and inserted into the base of the distal phalanx
also with two micro-Mitek suture anchors with hemi-Adelaide's to each slip.[15] A 5–0 p-dioxanone (PDS) epitendinous suture from the FDP tendon to the distal phalanx
periosteum was also performed. The A4 pulley was not repaired as the remaining pulley
system was intact and no bowstringing was encountered. The patient was dressed and
placed in a dorsal blocking splint in the intrinsic plus position[16] postoperatively following closure with nonabsorbable sutures. Both tendons had good
glide intraoperatively, with no gapping.
He started early active mobilization protocol as per the Manchester Rehabilitation
Protocol[17] for flexor tendon lesions at day 3 with the hand therapists. At this stage, he was
also changed to a thermoplastic dorsal Duran splint.
Follow-up at 13 weeks showed that the patient was able to achieve flexion to the midpalmer
crease and range of motion of the MCPJ of 0 of 100, proximal interphalangeal joint
(PIPJ) of −8 of 98, and distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) of −6 of 40. The contralateral
finger had range of motion of MCPJ grip strength that was 58% of the contralateral
side. The patient returned to low manual stress work after completing 8 weeks of rehabilitation
and to high-level sports training after completion of week 12. There were no limitations
in activities of daily living. Clinical and imaging outcomes can be seen in [Fig. 3].
Fig. 3 (A–D) Clinical outcome after completion of 12 months of follow-up. (E, F) X-ray outcome at completion of 12 months of follow-up.
Discussion
Closed rupture of both digital flexor tendons is a rare occurrence, with the described
mechanism of injury varying greatly in the literature. We report a case of a closed
FDP and FDS tendon avulsion injury following forced hyperextension against a flexed
finger (“classic” jersey finger). This patient presented early and was appropriately
clinically assessed. An exploration and repair was undertaken on the second day after
the injury, within 48 hours of the event.
We conducted a review of cases reported in peer-reviewed literature, identifying 20
cases in total, as can be seen in [Table 1]. Of these cases, 14 reported ruptures of both FDP and FDS tendons from their insertions
and six reported ruptures in the midsubstance of the tendons. Where demographic information
was included, the median age of the described cases was 27.5 years old (mean: 28.8
years), and all patients were male. The ring finger was most commonly affected. Overall,
six different mechanisms were encountered including six other patients presenting
with the mechanism of a typical jersey finger.
Table 1
Published reports of closed injuries of both FDS and FDP tendons
|
Author
|
Age (y)
|
Sex
|
Mechanism
|
Involved finger
|
Site rupture
|
Technique
|
Time to surgery
|
Follow-up
|
Outcome
|
|
Our case
|
27
|
M
|
Jersey finger
|
Ring finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
FDP: suture anchor
FDS: suture anchor
|
2 days
|
12 months
|
E/F–MCP + 10/90
PIP: 0/112
DIP: 16/64
Grip strength: 72% of contralateral side (dominant side)
Tip to distal palmar crease = 0 cm
|
|
Boyes et al[3]
|
Multiple (5 cases, ages not given)
|
Multiple (5 cases, sex not given)
|
Hyperextension × 4
Jersey finger × 1
|
Multiple (5 cases, finger not given)
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions in all 5 cases
|
Not described
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Cheung and Chow[4]
|
24
|
M
|
Jersey finger
|
Ring finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
Both tendons sutured to periosteal flap. FDP reinforced w/ pull-out suture
|
4 days
|
3.5 months
|
Full ROM MCP and PIP, DIP 0–4 degrees
|
|
Cañadas Moreno et al[5]
|
16
|
M
|
Blast
|
Index finger and middle finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
FDP: pull-out suture
FDS: anchor suture
|
0 days
|
4 months
|
DIP flexion: 30 degrees × 2 digits
|
|
Toussaint et al[6]
|
23
|
M
|
Blast
|
Ring finger and little finger
|
FDP: dilacerated in zone 1 + volar plate pull-out, FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
FDP: pull-out suture
FDS: resected
|
1 day
|
7 months
|
D4: DIP flexion 15; PIP flexion: 10
D5: DIP 40
PIP flexion: 10
|
|
Backe and Posner[7]
|
23
|
M
|
Traction hyperextension
|
Ring finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
Palmaris longus tendon graft
|
4 weeks
|
NM
|
Complete extension and active flexion within 1.5 cm of midpalmar crease
DIP stiffness
|
|
Lanzetta and Conolly[8]
|
28
|
M
|
Traction hyperextension
|
Ring finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
Two stage repair: excision both tendons, left palmaris tendon graft 9 weeks post first
surgery
|
3 days
|
4 months
|
Full extension and flexion recovered
|
|
Johnson and Colville[9]
|
35
|
M
|
Traction hyperextension
|
Ring finger
|
FDP: zone 2
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
FDP: intraosseous repair
FDS: resected
|
4 weeks
|
5 months
|
E/F–MCP: 0/82
PIP: 4/102
DIP: 10/20
Tip to distal palmar crease = 0 cm
|
|
Jordan et al[10]
|
20
|
M
|
Jersey finger
|
Middle finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both at insertions
|
FDP: pull-out suture
FDS: resected
|
14 days
|
4 months
|
Full movement of PIP and arc of 20–70 at DIPJ
|
|
Soro et al[11]
|
30
|
M
|
Jersey finger
|
Little finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 3
FDP at insertion
FDS midsubstance
|
FDP: pull-out suture
FDS: tendon graft
|
0 days
|
6 months
|
E/F–MCP: 0/95
PIP: 10/85
DIP: 10/22
Tip to distal palmar crease = 0 cm
|
|
Boyes et al[3]
|
37
|
M
|
Jersey finger
|
Middle finger
|
FDP: zone 3
FDS: zone 3
Both midsubstance at lumbrical origin
|
Not described
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Boyes et al[3]
|
42
|
M
|
Hyperextension
|
Little finger
|
FDP: zone 3
FDS: zone 3
Both midsubstance at lumbrical origin
|
Not described
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Oğün et al[12]
|
21
|
M
|
Jersey finger
|
Ring finger
|
FDP: zone 1
FDS: zone 2
Both midsubstance
|
FDP: pull-out suture
FDS: resected
|
0 days
|
19 months
|
TAM = 230 degrees
PIP and DIP stiffness
|
|
Naohito et al[13]
|
49
|
M
|
Direct shock
|
Little finger
|
FDP: zone 2
FDS: zone 2
Both midsubstance
|
FDP: end-to-end suture, FDS: resected
|
20 days
|
4 months
|
E/F–MCP: 30/0/80
PIP 0/40/85
DIP: 0/5/60
|
|
Matthews and Walton[14]
|
28
|
M
|
Repeated microtrauma
|
Middle finger
|
FDP: zone 2,
FDS: zone 2
Both midsubstance
|
2 stage repair: silicone rod, reoperation at 10 weeks, PL graft
|
14 days
|
3.5 months
|
Good result: normal flexion
DIP and PIP stiffness
|
Abbreviations: DIP, distal interphalangeal; DIPJ, DIP joint; E/F, extension/flexion;
FDP, flexor digitorum profundus; FDS, flexor digitorum superficialis; M, male; MCP,
metacarpophalangeal joint; N/A, not available; NM, not mentioned;
PIP, proximal interphalangeal; ROM, range of motion; TAM, total active motion.
One other author used ultrasound as an adjunct to diagnosis. In our case, while ultrasound
did not give us a definitive diagnosis, it did allow us to define our preoperative
surgical strategy. The use of ultrasound has been studied in the context of single
flexor tendon injuries; however, its utility for multiple closed tendon injuries has
yet to be established.[11]
[18]
[19]
FDP avulsion injuries were classically described by Leddy and Packer[2] and included three subtypes as follows—I: a tendinous avulsion with disruption of
the vinculum and retraction into the palm; II: a tendinous avulsion which retracts
to the PIPJ with intact vinculum; and III: a bony avulsion injury with retraction
to the A4 pulley. This classification has since been modified to include type IV[20]; a combination of a bony avulsion and tendon avulsion with secondary tendon retraction
into the finger or palm and a distal phalanx fracture incarcerated at the A4 pulley.
A further addition to the classification described a type V,[21] an intra-articular bony avulsion associated with an extra-articular fracture. We
propose that this injury, FDP avulsion, accompanied by avulsion of the FDS tendon,
having been seen a similar number of times in the literature to the type-V injury,
warrants inclusion as a separate entity in the Leddy and Packer classification as
a “type VI” injury.[2]
[20]
[21]
[22] It has been suggested that the pathological mechanism for this might be due to a
trapping of the FDP tendon at the decussation of the FDS tendon at the level of Camper's
chiasm, with continued extension force against the contracted FDS/FDP tendons, resulting
in FDS rupture from its insertion.[10] Awareness of a type-VI Leddy and Packer injury would encourage clinicians to consider
this diagnosis early in patient care and plan for operative intervention appropriately.
It would also enable rehabilitation specialists to derive plans to manage this type
of injury as a distinct entity from a closed single-tendon avulsion.
Our case is unusual as both tendons had been avulsed from their insertion sites with
no associated bony injury. The decision on whether to repair both tendons is controversial.
Some experts advocate for FDS repair to provide independent PIPJ flexion and increase
power grip; however, it theoretically increases the risk of tendon adhesion which
may reduce the total range of motion and increase the possibility of requiring secondary
tenolysis. The only evidence for this is a trial of tendon injury in zone 2C, with
a small number of patients.[23] We decided to repair the FDS in our case, as the injury was at the FDS insertion
(zone 2A), the flexor sheath and pulley system was intact proximal to the FDS insertion,
and our patient competed in high-level sport where grip strength is important. His
compliance with rehabilitation was also likely to be high, thus mitigating the likelihood
of adhesion formation through inactivity during rehabilitation. We debated intraoperatively
whether one slip of the FDS tendon would be sufficient, given the preference of some
surgeons for this method but due to the nature of this specific injury, we felt it
was reasonable to restore anatomic and kinematic normality by repairing both slips.[24]
[25]
Half of the other authors in our review decided to resect the FDS, but in cases where
the FDS was ruptured from its insertion site, it was fixed with a transosseous suture.
Both of these cases were associated with avulsion fractures. Our case saw a pure tendinous
rupture from the insertion into the middle phalanx. We repaired the FDS slips using
two suture anchors. We also repaired the FDP tendon using suture anchors, a technique
adopted by only one other author. Other described techniques included the use of a
pull-out suture, end-to-end suture (where appropriate), or resection and subsequent
tendon grafting. Suture anchors seem to confer increased strength[26] and allow for quicker return to work[27] in comparison to pull-out suture techniques for zone-I FDP avulsions.
Conclusion
This unusual presentation is not one that many clinicians frequently encounter. We
believe that if presented with a similar case of pure tendinous avulsion injuries
of both FDS and FDP tendons, suture anchor repair of both tendons can provide an excellent
outcome, and we would recommend this technique. We suggest that this combination of
closed avulsions of FDP and FDS tendons from their insertions should be added to the
Leddy and Packer classification as a “type-VI” injury, due to its distinction from
a simple FDP avulsion injury and the complexities in its management.
