Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(03): 338-340
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751290
Ethics Corner

Suspending Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate Orders for Image-Guided Procedures

Eric Cyphers
1   Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Sara Silberstein
2   Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
,
Eric J. Keller
3   Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Interventional radiologists (IRs) often care for critically ill patients, providing both treatment and palliation. For example, a recent study found that patients died within 30 days of 9% of inpatient image-guided procedures and within 6 months of 7% of outpatient image-guided procedures.[1] It is also not uncommon for these patients to have do not resuscitate and/or do not intubate (DNR/DNI) orders or other advance directives expressing patients' wishes to refuse resuscitation and/or intubation in the event of a cardiac arrest or the loss of a protected airway.[2] When asked to perform a procedure for these patients, IRs can face a few different ethical dilemmas: the patient may want to keep the DNR/DNI order in place for their procedure, the documented code status may conflict with patient or family preferences, or respecting such preferences in the face of a code can be disturbing for the IR and/or members of their team. This article considers each of these issues with suggestions of how to best navigate them.



Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA